With the ongoing discussions about Bruce Waltke's video at the BioLogos website and his subsequent resignation from RTS, as well as
the long comment thread here at Evangel about events in Genesis, I thought I would post some thoughts about the relationship between science and religion that....
First, I think it's highly amusing that a post stating, in effect, «the debate is over» has produced
the longest comments thread in JQ's history.
Not exact matches
Long history with Sabio and this
comment was in direct response to another
thread.
As Julie herself has suggested in a few
comments on this
thread, it's the sob storyline of «the suffering spouse» whose wife has become mentally ill, and the marriage has
long since declined, but she is still grasping to keep it alive or alternatively to take revenge, and et cetera, et cetera.
It didn't take me
long to realize that Gary and I were on the same side — but sometimes things get lost in
comments and
threads.
I didn't
comment in the other
thread so it wasn't that it go too
long for me, the focus just drifted.
I wonder how
long it'll be before the
comment threads devolve into arguments about Hitler's religion (or lack thereof).
NP, I've read your blog for quite a
long time now and I've got ta say that there is no other blog that I read that consisently has
comment threads like the one above.
So my friend Carl Scott sent me an email asking if he could contribute a reflection on the Porcher - Pomo debate that is a bit
long for a normal
comment on the
thread below.
Don't really want to get involved in a discussion about the site in the recruiting
thread, but I would think / hope that the above
comment would really strike a chord with
long - time readers of the site.
Someone
commented on Dr. Amy's other Ina
thread that what Ina was writing about is A-OK as
long as the mother consents.
In the end, this one status update sparked a 22 -
comment -
long discussion
thread involving six people (including me), none of whom except the two other Rice alumni were connected in any way other than through having known me at some point.
Any concerns about breaching election rules (which is why the
thread referred to above is closed to
comments) will no
longer apply.
I did find a
long thread of
comments in support of LCR on the summit's Facebook page, as well as a few tweets like these:
The physics blogosphere carried
long threads of
comments attacking and defending the theory and then attacking the tone of the discussion.
Reading this
comment stream makes me so sad — filled with people who
long to use Peter's experience to cheat, to return to stuffing themselves with cake, to drinking... unless, like Peter you exercise an enormous amount (and while it's less than he used to, it's still way more than most people in this
thread do), you'll gain all your weight and health problems back.
the good thing was, you could name a movie / tv that virtually everyone else had
long forgotten about, and there the page would be, with a message board to use for it... meant you could read other
comments / questions by people, even if there were very few
threads on the show / person because of their obscurity..
Set forth below is the text of a
comment that I recently posted to the discussion
thread for another blog entry at this site: «Robert Shiller is the one who published peer - reviewed research in 1981 showing that valuations affect
long - term returns.
There was actually another
comment earlier in the
thread that pointed out that people seem to ignore valuation when looking at
long - term stock performance.
Josie, if you think there's any innocence about it, I suggest you read the
comment thread linked below until you can no
longer stomach it, note the patience and tolerance exercised by Schmidt et al. who did not allow stomach - turning content to deter from spending all spare and sleep time dealing with it, and then join the fray.
Trouble is the results are on an old
comment thread at Tamino's place, and the post is no
longer accessible, so I'm working from memory.
As a
long time reader I miss your energy and knowledge in the
comment -
threads.
The ideology — as defined above — is obvious, from the CRU e-mails, from some of the «pro-AGW» websites, from IPCC activities, and particularly from some of the
longer comments in recent
threads here.
IMHO the reason that this
thread has lasted so
long and received so many
comments is that Vaughan Pratt has posted a contentious document and then (a) studiously ignored all information that shows it to be a dud, and (b) continued to throw out irrelevant challenges.
I thought it was just a random
comment at the end of a
long thread nobody would pay any attention to.
It is a
LONG thread of
comments!
THANK YOU to everyone who heard Maria Pita and sent a letter off to their favorite politician or editor, or made
comment in the
long thread online at The Australian, highlighting the many inadequacies in the recent report by the Technical Advisory Forum into the homogenization of historical temperature data by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology.
On a side note: Courtney's announcement he made in https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/10/28/manns-hockey-stick-disappears-and-crus-briffa-helps-make-the-mwp-live-again-by-pointing-out-bias-in-ther-data/#comment-1127600 to not respond to my
comments in this
thread anymore, was true only for as
long.
In a
comment on a Facebook - book
thread, Miriam Robinson said she is no
longer using the terms climate change, global warming, or similar.
Joules would like you to know that he is no
longer participating in this
thread because his
comments were being purposely held up such his ability to rejoin and rebut was unfairly hampered.
What amazes (and sometimes even annoys) me about that
long - running
thread (heading towards 40,000
comments?)
The «Share» command in Safari makes it easy to email links to posts on WUWT to friends and relatives, but I know most don't have the time to spend studying
long, often intricate arguments, and references to people they never heard of, not to mention reading lengthy
Comments threads.
This is why these
threads end up 1000
comments long.
Given that it's next to impossible for me to engage in a direct exchange with someone here because of Judith's moderation of my
comments, I'll just link to a couple of previous
threads where I've been engaged in discussion about how Schneider's
comments play out in the climate wars: Besides, I wouldn't want to subject you to more «
long abstract musing,» right?
Peter, I have deleted you first new
comment (your fifth undeleted
comment on this
thread) because it is too
long, off topic and repeats material you have posted many places elsewhere on my blog.
I point to that
comment thread because it contains many
long comments with references to positive results bias and the deep cultural dysfunction of the scientific community.
I don't know when these last two
comments were made as I stopped monitoring this
thread a
long time ago.
On sundry
comment threads, I admit this, and tell minimalists / deniers: «My fiancée's Dad skippered the first n - sub under the cap in the fifties, and described to me what it was like to carefully crawl under it looking for that rarest spot to safely surface, in a
long - into - the - night reminiscence in the mid-seventies.
First, for those of you who might already use Slack and Hipchat, it's notable that Teams looks like it will include the ability to have
threaded comments, where you can reply inline in a conversation — a feature that Slack, for one, has said for a
long time now that it has been working on but has yet to include.
So before you quit, go into groups or
threads where you've left
comments or messages and delete the ones you no
longer want there.
For example, while you're reading through
comments, you'll notice with each indent in a
long thread, the line next to the
comment has a different color, making it easier to differentiate between the posts.