Sentences with phrase «long enough running»

jack will be back eventually but I think he's not had a long enough run in the first team for his absence to be a huge blow... and with rosicky and welbeck coming back, can't say am too worried.

Not exact matches

These Jack - of - all - trades shoes are light enough for speedwork, cushioned for long runs, and have a smooth ride that doesn't fade even as you pile on the miles.

A spokesman for the prosecutors in the city of Brunswick (Braunschweig) told Fortune that recent disclosures suggesting that chief executive Martin Winterkorn was aware of the long - running deception of U.S. regulators already in May 2014 — over a year before the company finally admitted it to the world — weren't enough by themselves to justify opening an investigation into the former boss.

Tim Cook has now run Apple for five years, long enough for this to be his company rather than Steve Jobs».

Anyone who wanted to run as a Republican was fine, as long as they said enough of the right things.

He recognized that to compete with Silicon Valley techies, many of whom have been coding for as long as he had been running around on football fields, eight weeks of learning was not enough.

«Often vineyard owners just don't have enough money to keep their operations running long enough,» observes Professor Stephen Mutkoski, a wine expert at Cornell University.

I've yet to take a flight long enough to completely drain the Mini, even with continual video playing, but the Note Pro was running low by the time we'd crossed the ocean.

Easing EPA restrictions — the industry is challenging EPA in court — would help over the long run, but not enough to offset the loss of market share to natural gas, he said.

Did the study run long enough?

Long before Trump even announced a run for office, the zeitgeist had an understanding that one day Donald Trump would convince enough of his fellow countrymen that he should be president.

be humble enough to know that a 1 is better than a 0 and sometimes optimizing for maximum valuation doesn't pay off in the long run.

Some provisions phase out, presumably to lower the long - run deficit effects for scoring purposes, but that's unlikely to be enough.

Now, the Consumer Staples giant is the largest company ever to face a proxy fight, signaling that size alone is no longer enough to keep activists away from poorly run companies.

In general, to make up for the $ 95 you'll have to spend at least $ 9,500 each year in the long run to earn enough points to pay it off in cash.

It's no longer enough for Congress to «do no harm» in the near term and ensure solvency of entitlement programs over the long run.

In the long run companies must create enough cash flow to pay expenses, invest in the future (capital expenditures), service their debt (if any), and return money to shareholders.

If you have enough capital to run a standard bitcoin exchange and trading company, then you should consider the option of leasing a facility for your office; when you lease, you will be able to work with long — term planning, structuring and expansion.

Really highlights that buying and holding can really pay off in the long run if you are lucky enough to choose the right companies up front.

We've been at this long enough to remember what the beer scene was like when the big guys ran everything.

If the stock market is down in the early years of your retirement and you have to sell stocks at a loss to get enough income for your basic expenses, you can really hurt your portfolio's value in both the short run and the long run.

«Discounts to asset value are not enough, in the long run you need earnings to be able to sustain and nurture the corporate values» Peter Cundill

When Matter Did Not Exist The radioactive elements in existence today have not yet been in existence long enough to have run their course, and disintegrated into lead.

Will the Willow Creek way generate enough intellectual grounding among followers to help them spot and avoid the problems in the long run that come with attention only to quick fixes?

«I had run wild long enough, was seeing so many lives go to hell, didn't want mine to go there, but couldn't figure a way out,» he tells me as we stand outside the Grady Cole Center.

You've been running long enough.

I was grateful in the long run that someone cared enough to witness in the first place.

But what you've done is use religion as a hook and if you use the hook for long enough it becomes part of the reality of the problem, and that's the huge danger in places where religious feeling runs high.»

One other person is always more than enough, when you believe that that person will listen to you until you run out of things to say, when you trust that that person will wait for as long as it takes for you to understand why you are the way you are, when you realize that that person will always impute the best of motives to your actions, however clumsy you feel inside.

It's the oldest, and longest running con in human history, and I'm not gullible enough to buy it.

I find that it «blooms» as it settles in the fridge overnight, becoming much more garlicky after a rest, so that even if it doesn't seem like enough at first, it likely will be in the long run.

But once I got home from my run and sat down long enough to sense how I was feeling, my temperature was already rising and I felt exhausted.

Thinking maybe I didn't freeze the batter long enough, I let it sit in the freezer for another 45 mins, did a test run again and the same results.

No matter how long I leave it in the fridge it never separates, and so I use my hand mixer and mix and mix and mix, but it never really gets solid enough, so ends up running down the sides of the cake.

If you let dried fruits and nuts run long enough in a food processor, eventually it will become a paste — the oil in the nuts will bind it together.

Today I was particularly hungry after a long run in the morning, so three samosas was definitely not enough to quash my cravings.

Am I just not running it long enough?

you can not run your business emotionally or football team with sentiments towards under performed layers... or move them or sell them and as customer I'm entitle to demand, I'm entitle to my opinion so many are and we have SUFFER LONG ENOUGH because what WE KNOW IS NEEDED TO IMPROVE OUR SQUAD HAS NOT BEEN DONE..

«He ran them ragged at White Hart Lane and I haven't seen anyone do that to Chelsea for a long, long time, and I think he's good enough to do it again.»

obviously I would prefer to have a much more suitable alternative in the defensive midfielder positions but if they focused more on defensive end and the occasional long - ball, this would allow Bellerin and Sead ample opportunities to bomb forward on their respective wings while still having enough cover to maintain their defensive shape... it would likewise allow for overlapping runs on both wings, thereby letting both Sanchez and Perez to cut inside and get shots away in and around the top of the box with their most dominant feet... if goals were needed I would sub Bellerin for OX and bring Ramsey in for Elneny then switch to a 3 -2-4-1 (more of a 3 -1-5-1 with Ramsey playing higher up the pitch) and I would only use Giroud as a sub when the game dictated it for tactical reasons... this would allow us to be a high energy team with incredible link - up play and a much more direct approach in the offensive end

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

Olden and Bane are too small to play small forward for long stretches and not good enough ball handlers to run point against pressure defense.

You want to talk about a cluster fuck, it's hard enough to move the ball on that defense, but giving up yards because of presnap penalties when the Panthers already couldn't get their running game going almost guaranteed they would end up facing yet another third - and - long every time it happened.

In the long run, I don't think that'll be enough.

The ball dribbled to the right and the surprised second baseman delayed fielding it long enough for the surprised third base coach to send the surprised runner on third home with the winning run.

I have always had a healthy respect for what Wenger has done for us over the years but this run of results is too much by a long chalk and its time that his competancy and the boards ambition was called into question by any of the fan groups strong enough to make a difference, theres around 200 million comming into the club next season with the new BT sports deal and I am almost certain that this wont be spent on the players we really need nor will it be used to lower season ticket prices, so where will this money go?

These reus articles are really boring and annoying, the lad is not coming to arsenal get over it, we have enough wide attacking options anyway, I will say though that he shouldn't go to Madrid though imo, he's class but I can't see him dislodging any of Madrids front three anytime soon, especially with him being injury prone, think it would be very bad for his career in the long run

We need to change some players, even if they are good players to make our game more dinamic, more complete.If Walcott will leave, definetly Sterling is the right choose to play with Sanchez.If Bayern will want Ozil, I think we should let him go.I think mutch people will be not agree with this, Ozil is a great player BUT is not a complete player, doesn't have enough speed and is seems sometimes like he is not involved in the game.I think a switch with Gotze can be benefic for our team, he run alot, is creative and make the defensive as well.We need a Striker to, but a good one, someone like Benzema or Cavani, someome who can get at least 20 goals per season.A new DM is what we need for balance the game, I think Vidal is the best in the world in this moment (is just my opinion), he working hard in defence and can win a game with a long shot.This is the way I see footbal.

He will not venture high up the pitch because his slow running back acceleration and poor long distance pace will let him down, he most often pass the ball long and too quickly, this is also a problem for arsenal in a sense that he does not come out with the ball and allow his players enough time to take up better position.

For long enough now epl has been accustomed to fast and direct wingers, wingers who only have to run to the flag and put in the cross, and sometimes try and score.