It doesn't have
any long wear claims, so you do have to reapply after eating, drinking or kissing.
Not exact matches
Reebok
claimed this product «reduces
wear and tear in key leg muscles by up to 20 % allowing you to train harder for
longer.
Looking back on Mourinho's career, the
longest stint he spent at one club was first time round at Chelsea, where he lasted just over three years after his initial success had started to
wear off, only
claiming the League Cup in his final full season before struggling at the beginning of the next.
I was dubious about the healing powers others
claim about copper but these sock feel great, don't smell after
long wears / working out and a great price.
Many backpacking companies in particular pride themselves on the number of bar tacks integrated into their products,
claiming that they will
wear harder and
longer than the competition.»
However, when I saw that the Clarins Everlasting Cushion Foundation
claimed to be
long wearing, I was intrigued.
I have bought a couple of eyeliners in the past that
claimed to be
long wear, and they have smudged, faded or left marks under my eye.
There are 6 shades and these blushes
claim to
wear up to 16 hours but I must say I did not
wear it for that
long, although it did stay on my cheeks for a
long while.
Key
Claims and Benefits:
Long -
wearing, eight hours crease - proof, water - resistant, features a creamy formula, ophthalmologist tested, dermatologist tested, for all skin types safe for contact lens wearers and non-acnegenic.
The MAC Pro Longwear foundation is indeed
long -
wearing as per its
claims.
MAC
claims that this Pro
Long -
wear foundation gives you up to 15 hours of
wear in any environmental condition.
Unlike most regular matte lipsticks, these don't
claim to be
long wearing.
I don't really
wear makeup for 24 hours
long so I couldn't comment on the 24 hr staying power
claim though this lasted me a good 5 - 6 hours without smudging or any prominent flaking.
These include: United States v. Resendiz - Ponce, which presents the question whether the omission of an element from a federal indictment can constitute harmless error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a
long distance carrier for alleged violations of the Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who
claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court
wearing buttons with the deceased's picture on them.