Sentences with phrase «longer accepts paper»

Well, that company no longer accepts paper resumes.

Cameron no longer accepts paper queries.

Garfield County School District No. 16 no longer accepts paper applications.

I am no longer accepting papers like that.

The ISBN agency has launched an online portal and according to their website they are no longer accepting paper application.

The ASPCA's Volunteer Program accepts online applications on a quarterly basis (sorry, we no longer accept paper applications).

Publishers of scientific journals no longer accept papers that challenge the claims made by the IPCC, no matter the paper's quality.»

Not exact matches

The Bank has also begun to accept both short - and long - term securities backed by residential mortgages — asset - backed commercial paper (ABCP) and residential mortgage - backed securities (RMBS) respectively — as collateral.

The broader issue of whether we should accept an average current account deficit of 4 3/4 per cent of GDP in the long run would require another paper as long as the one I am presenting today.

If Arsene really does love this club, then he must accept responsibility for this shambles, we have been papering over the cracks for far to long.

Steinman and his team's approach is «novel for a couple of reasons,» says Ben Booth, a climate scientist at the Met Office Hadley Centre in Exeter, U.K.. Although it's already widely accepted in the community that the Pacific Ocean plays a large role, this paper gives a much longer time context, he says, highlighting the role of both oceans over many decades.

But the editorial team of the Journal of Natural Pharmaceuticals, headed by Editor - in - Chief Ilkay Orhan, a professor of pharmacy at Eastern Mediterranean University in Gazimagosa, Cyprus, asked the fictional Cobange for only superficial changes to the paper — different reference formats and a longer abstract — before accepting it 51 days later.

Perhaps the key point made by Hayflick, both above and in a recent paper titled, «Biological aging is no longer an unsolved problem,» (and generally accepted among leading gerontology researchers) is that the body's repair and maintenance systems are the primary determinants of longevity.14 The question then becomes, «What causes these systems to lose their ability to outpace the damage of daily life?»

There is no longer any paper applications being used or accepted.

We no longer accept magazines, flyers, phonebooks, or recyclable papers for donation.

«We no longer require the original paper copy of certain documents, and are instead able to accept a digital version submitted online or via email.

I will try and be impartial, though, but I did write a paper with Mike (which came out in GRL in Aug 2003) and we currently have a long paper tentatively accepted by Reviews of Geophysics.

The French study contradicts a Japanese paper that used larger samples, longer trials and accepted experimental designs, yet received virtually no notice because it found no increase in cancer in rats fed on GM crops.

I'm not so sure, so this paper could merely be another attempt to have trees accepted as a good proxy for historical temperatures — how long will it take for Mann to spot the «fatal flaw» in this paper?

Then when reviewed and accepted there [«paper in press» should be enough] submit a short «Letter» to Nature or Science summarizing the main message and referring to the long paper for details.

While this faulty paper has never been retracted, it is now no longer quoted as evidence by the IPCC — nor accepted by the overwhelming majority of IPCC scientists: Most if not all warming of the early 20th century is due to natural, not human causes.

This paper also dismissed decades of life history table analyses that have long been accepted within the scientific community, stating that they were of «limited value» (p. 1059).

But would love to know how long it took «Team» Steig to get their paper accepted...

IIRC it took Steig et al about as long to get their paper accepted.

You have to consider the possibiity than Anthony and Steve could now stall for as long as they like, never release the data and many people would consider this published paper to be an accepted fact.