Sentences with phrase «longer than most investors»

Not exact matches

Long delayed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Title III was the most controversial provision of the JOBS Act because it allowed non-accredited investors — generally defined as individuals with less than $ 1 million in assets who earn less than $ 200,000 per year — to invest in private companies as shareholders.

Although he's no longer privy to management discussions, as one of Twitter's first, biggest and most involved investors, Sacca probably knows more about the company than anyone who's not a current executive or board member.

Today's suburban markets primarily favor long - term investors seeking steady returns rather than those wanting quick cashouts, most analysts say.

That's why, ultimately, I can't really blame Jana Partners for pushing for a break - up... Qualcomm's licenses by themselves would be a money gusher, at least for a few years, and while I think most investors are more long - term oriented than people think, I can absolutely understand the temptation — and associated price premium — associated with money in hand now.

Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: our ability to achieve our financial, strategic and operational plans or initiatives; our ability to predict and manage medical costs and price effectively and develop and maintain good relationships with physicians, hospitals and other health care providers; the impact of modifications to our operations and processes; our ability to identify potential strategic acquisitions or transactions and realize the expected benefits of such transactions, including with respect to the Merger; the substantial level of government regulation over our business and the potential effects of new laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations; the outcome of litigation, regulatory audits, investigations, actions and / or guaranty fund assessments; uncertainties surrounding participation in government - sponsored programs such as Medicare; the effectiveness and security of our information technology and other business systems; unfavorable industry, economic or political conditions, including foreign currency movements; acts of war, terrorism, natural disasters or pandemics; our ability to obtain shareholder or regulatory approvals required for the Merger or the requirement to accept conditions that could reduce the anticipated benefits of the Merger as a condition to obtaining regulatory approvals; a longer time than anticipated to consummate the proposed Merger; problems regarding the successful integration of the businesses of Express Scripts and Cigna; unexpected costs regarding the proposed Merger; diversion of management's attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities during the pendency of the Merger; potential litigation associated with the proposed Merger; the ability to retain key personnel; the availability of financing, including relating to the proposed Merger; effects on the businesses as a result of uncertainty surrounding the proposed Merger; as well as more specific risks and uncertainties discussed in our most recent report on Form 10 - K and subsequent reports on Forms 10 - Q and 8 - K available on the Investor Relations section of www.cigna.com as well as on Express Scripts» most recent report on Form 10 - K and subsequent reports on Forms 10 - Q and 8 - K available on the Investor Relations section of www.express-scripts.com.

Rather than its results, most investors focused on KKR's decision to pull the trigger on a long - considered move to convert from partnership to corporation status, trading double taxation for greater simplicity and willingness among investors to put their money into the private equity company's shares.

For most investors, longer - term interest rates are more important than the short - term federal funds rate.

We generally think that most investors will do better to stick to a long - term plan and not make such calls, which on balance will hurt more than they help.

For now it's best to assume, while it won't give you outstanding returns, you'll lose less than most other professional investors during the long run.

Looking at the short term volatility rather than the long time development of stock is according to Warren Buffet one of the most common mistakes among investors on all levels.

Most bond investors take a buy - and - hold strategy, partially because bonds are less liquid than stocks but also because the income characteristics of bonds are attractive over the long - term.

Years Ending value 20 $ 2,191 40 $ 4,801 60 $ 10,520 80 $ 23,050 100 $ 50,505 I believe that most investors with a really - long - term view will be willing to take on some additional risk in order to seek more growth than that.

One of the most interesting is his discussion about how retail investors can benefit from the Efficient Market Hypothesis (which he refers to as «illuminating but not true») but also then benefit from their own personal risk preferences / situations and the ability to take a longer view than a fund manager who has to justify their performance in quarterly / yearly reviews and investments that may be currently flavour of the month.

Research has shown that most passive investors tend to achieve higher returns in the long run than most active investors after considering taxes and fees.

I'm afraid the long term risk of a dividend cut is higher than most investors perceive.

We focus on long - term results, rather than on trying to manage short - term volatility, and can add the most value when investors» goals are aligned with that long - term time horizon.

Although often overlooked, the concept of hedging is most relevant over much shorter time frames than the decades - long horizons of most long - term investors.

The option of holding to maturity means you will have to wait longer than most can wait, and most institutional investors don't even have an average 10 - year holding period.

In fact, to put a fine point on it, we think most investors are more likely to hurt their long - term returns than help them by trying to time the market in any additional way.

For most investors, having a long - term approach based on clear investment goals is better than worrying too much about the shifts in the curve.

At the same time, we shared a concern that most U.S. investors are poorly positioned to capture these opportunities, as they tend to view international exposures as an in - and - out, «risk play» rather than a long - term strategy.

Until now, I've recommended slightly overweighting this portfolio to value stocks, which as most savvy investors know have a reliable long - term record of doing better than growth stocks.

We view this as a suitable level of transparency, particularly since most investors in actively managed ETFs are usually seeking longer - term holding periods than index strategies, which can be (and often are) used for trading purposes.

PEG ratios work for core and growth investors, but the PEG ratio hurdles needed for investment are lower than most investors think, so long as the expected rate of return (discount rate) is high.

This book has risk positions lasting longer than most books, and generally, I think that is right, unless markets have gone to such high levels that intelligent investors should lighten up.

We have found that most investors have quite exaggerated views about long term stock market returns, mainly believing they are much more erratic than they are.

In my case that primarily means buying out of favour stocks (the central theme of value investing) and holding them longer than most other investors, a process known as time - arbitrage.

Implied inflation fell by more than 250 basis points in the 2007 - 2009 period, as investors piled into the safest, most liquid Treasury bonds, and began to contemplate long - term deflation.

Having a longer time horizon than these speculators appears to be one of the most enduring edges an investor can possess.»

Obviously, most value investors have timeframes that are much longer than the average, but I still think a lot of the language and discussion points I hear are very focused on short - term data points, events, or catalysts that have lots to do with where the stock price might go in the next few months, but little to do with the long - term value of the business.

While this is less often than most investors believe, market declines and bear markets are a regular part of long term investing.

Rather than worrying about and betting on what the market might do in the future, most investor's time would be better spent looking for stocks and even sectors that are undervalued and have the potential for enormous long term price recovery.

Writing in Institutional Investor in January 1968, no less an industry guru than Charles D. Ellis, then an analyst at Donaldson, Lufkin, and Jenrette, concluded that «short - term investing may actually be safer than long - term investing sometimes, and the price action of the stocks may be more important than the «fundamentals» on which most research is based.»

There are various estimates around this but most credible estimates indicate that dividends generate more than half of an investor's long term return.

Only that the economy has been far worse, for far longer, than most investors may realize.

In that case you might argue that they should invest a small portion of the portfolio in safe investments and the rest can be a higher risk portfolio because the time horizon for most of the portfolio is that of the relatives who inherit the money which would normally be a lot longer than that of the original investor.

Given that most investors are likely to stick to a single wallet address rather than having multiple XRP wallet addresses, it makes a lot of sense to understand your long - term requirements first and then select the best wallet for your requirements.

This year's survey found that in addition to longer - term rentals, investors are most likely to attempt to and rent their properties for less than 30 days.