Chen, T., and W.B. Rossow, 2002: Determination of top - of - atmosphere
longwave radiation fluxes: A comparison between two approaches using ScaRaB data.
Calculation of solar irradiance i.e. shortwave radiation flux and the atmosphere's heat radiation i.e.
longwave radiation flux is important.
Not exact matches
ocean system is associated with an amplified increase in arctic surface air temperature, downward
longwave radiation, and net heat
flux.
The warming of the world ocean is associated with an increase in global surface air temperature, downward
longwave radiation, and therefore net heat
flux.
The general argument however is being discussed by rasmus in the context of planetary energy balance: the impact of additional CO2 is to reduce the outgoing
longwave radiation term and force the system to accumulate excess energy; the imbalance is currently on the order of 1.45 * (10 ^ 22) Joules / year over the globe, and the temperature must rise allowing the outgoing
radiation term to increase until it once again matches the absorbed incoming stellar
flux.
ocean system is associated with an amplified increase in arctic surface air temperature, downward
longwave radiation, and net heat
flux.
The Stephens et al paper is a very incremental change from previous estimates of the global energy balances — chiefly an improvement in latent heat
fluxes because of undercounts in the satellite precipitation products and an increase in downward
longwave radiation.
where is the vertically integrated energy
flux in the atmosphere, is the net radiative energy input to an atmospheric column (the difference between absorbed shortwave
radiation and emitted
longwave radiation), and is the oceanic energy uptake at the surface.
The other
fluxes (shortwave and
longwave radiation at both surface and top of atmosphere) show more «normal» cycles (though somewhat higher values).
where SW denotes net downward shortwave
radiation, LW net upward
longwave radiation, LH latent heat
flux, and SH sensible heat
flux I can find these products at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis.surfaceflux.html Regarding the latent and sensible
fluxes I don't have a problem (since there are only two in the NCEP list), but regarding the others I have several.
Trenberth's energy budget schematic appears to claim a quite assymmetrical atmospheric
radiation distribution; since he gives an outgoing
longwave flux of 235 W / m ^ 2 of which 40 W / m ^ 2 is actually a direct path from the surface; not an atmospheric
radiation.
On the 2000 meter depth graph over 2006 - 2014 of Poitou & Bréon, the yearly minima increased from 10 units to 16 units of 1022 J that is 0.41 W / m ²; but there is every year some oceanic heat storage during six months and a release of this heat the following six months: the maximum of the global outgoing
longwave radiation is in July, shifted by 6 months w.r.t. the solar
flux hat is maximum in January (1412 W / m ²) and minimum in July (1321 W / m ²).
As per my posts above, it is possible for DLR to increase more than evaporation, and so the warming from the DLR beats the cooling from evaporation, leading to a warming whereby the system is moving towards equilibrium by increasing temperature and hence increasing sensible heat
flux and emitted
longwave radiation.
[1] Total absorbed
radiation (TAR), the sum of SNR [shortwave net
radiation] and LDR [
longwave downward
radiation], represents the total radiative energy available to maintain the Earth's surface temperature and to sustain the turbulent (sensible and latent) heat
fluxes in the atmosphere.
Notice that the upward
longwave flux at TOA is 240 W / m ² — this balances the absorbed solar
radiation.
This «
flux» has come to be termed DLR (for «downwelling
longwave radiation»), or sometimes DLW — the «L - W» meaning «Long - Wave.»
If surface temperature is what we care about, and the surface forcing in the tropics is very small, and the tropical ocean surface temperature being more dominated by evaporation than
longwave flux, well isn't this more relevant to the problem at hand than the tropospheric
radiation balance?
We use the 9 climate variables of surface air temperature (SAT), sea level pressure (SLP), precipitation (rain), the top of atmosphere (TOA) shortwave (SW) and
longwave (LW) full - sky
radiation, clear - sky
radiation (CLR, radiative
flux where clouds do not exists), and cloud radiative forcing (CRF, radiative effect by clouds diagnosed from the difference between full - sky and clear - sky
radiation, Cess et al. 1990).