Sentences with phrase «look at a defense»

Defensive organization Looking at our defense structure so far this season has been terrible, we gave free kicks easily, conceded goals in silly scenarios, and defending set - pieces and dead ball situations very poorly.
«It used to be that before I looked at the defense, I looked at the offensive line to see if it was doing its job.
«When we look at the defense and we are trying to get different pieces here in place — I don't think you get better until you develop and get a mindset of how you are going to play,» Veach said.
Let him adopt on the pitch and looking at our defense kolasinac should start every game Monreal is out played in that position to concede four goals at anfield is a disgrace for such a great club like arsenal.
i blame Wenger for building the squad but he can do Notting with these player look at the defense in quality
From my couch im looking at the defense and we have senior Debuchy, Mertesacker, Koscieny, Gibbs.
Also those two are more defensive minded than Xhaka, look at our defense, and tell me this isn't sensible.
Then you look at defense.
Gab will be looking at the defense (Mustafi, Holding) and he will definitely want to give his best.
Let's take a closer look at this defense contractor to see what gives it such a wide moat and allows it to treat dividend growth investors so well.

Not exact matches

A look at how the Defense Alliance in St. Paul, one of 10 economic clusters in an SBA pilot program, is nurturing energy entrepreneurs.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Those first - line - of - defense indicators give you a solid look at what kind of candidates are using what kind of devices — for how long, and with what degree of success.
«We know they have been or are looking to hire criminal defense counsel,» Ackman said at the 13D Monitor Active Passive Investor Summit on Monday.
Defense contractors have traditionally looked at themselves as the innovation for the U.S. military, but looking to commercial technology start - ups has been an increasingly growing activity for them.
So we have to look at that from that perspective,» the commander of U.S. Strategic Command, or STRATCOM, Air Force Gen. John Hyten said during the Association of the United States Army's Air and Missile Defense conference Wednesday.
Just look at the Iron Dome, the defense system that picks off terrorist rockets before they can hit Israeli communities.
Now, take a look at what you have accused me of doing on behalf of God and compare that what you do in defense of your against God.
There is an answer to that question, but to find it one must first look at a question more fundamental to his thought: the tension between his defense of the exclusive (and entirely legitimate) claims of the Catholic Church and his recognition of the presence of grace outside her boundaries.
Compared to the top teams, Arsenal look soft in midfield and defense and toothless at striker.
Many here are looking for a «Beast» to break up play and convert defense to offense at the drop of a hat all the while striking fear into our opponents.
Misone looks at the men in the middle of the defense and who stacks up as a legitimate NFL prospect.
at this point i would say carvalho and the colombian kid and if latter is too much go for vargas... ozil will add quality but do nt have a starting XI that is top quality yet... on bright side chambers looks like quality sanchez with a bit of tweaking will trouble any defense kos is a top drawer centre back and wilshere is getting back to his best..
When Romo was at the helm he did the same thing, he could read the defense and audible the play that needed to be run, his mistakes were often times the same mistakes we saw Dez and other WRs get into (dropped balls, running with the ball loose (murray I am looking at you), and tipping the ball up in the air).
Look at what Kuechly did for the Panthers defense or what Lattimore did for New Orleans secondary.
If you look at FanGraphs» statistical rankings for the preseason, they're in the middle of the pack in projected WAR from their lineup, so you can't just ignore the defense.
Before we even look at signings we need to look at Wegner and Arsenal, there is something FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG with the team and the tacts we implement, when you tell your full backs to overlap you tell the opposite one to stay back, he along with the DM / CM provide cover for the defense yet BOTH full backs are going forward.
Lets take chelsea for example the team is set up to be defense minded so Matic always looks so good (he is good tho) i remember when Song was wit us a lot were complaining about his lack of discipline and how he was a bad DM buh suddenly he becomes a world beater at Westham.are we sure if we bring him back he will be d same?am not saying we do nt need a DM buh over streching d issue by saying getting a Dm will end all our defense problems is wot i cant agree wit a DM can not cover everythin it has to do with the whole team.dat is d secret of bousquet at barca.
Look at how the players have been changing over the years in our defense from squillaci and djorou to vermaelin koscielny mustafi etc but the problems still persist.
Some individuals looked poor at times, but the defense as a whole did and looked plenty good enough.
We are looking very thin carzola wont be back elneny is out until at least the end of February we need to bluster our midfield our attacking midfield yes we can shuffle around with elexis and ozil and iwobi but is it the long term answer no I do nt think so as the attacking midfield is the place where most injuries occur along the side of the defense so if any one else gets injured we will very short and in deep trouble maybe after all we should call upon fabergas if no one else is available on a personal preference I would prefer veratie
But if you take the full body of play where he played especially when Hicks went down (i, e, vs the Panthers)---- to me looked like the total package, complete 3 down all situation linebacker that was one of big reasons this was an elite defense when it was playing at an elite level.
Look at the 2nd Redskins game, where it was just Bradham (No Hicks, No Kendricks), the Eagles defense was a total mess at the intermediate level.
However, looking at what Sutton is inviting the other team to do and extrapolating from that what his real fear is and what the real weakness of this defense is combined with the performance against Oakland shows that this is most likely not bad luck on 50/50 balls, but a true weakness that was desperately trying to be hidden by scheming.
For instance, look at what happened to the defense when we had Gaither and the injured Bradley back there (and to a lesser extent Chaney) vs. when we got Ryans.
So then I looked at their «conventional» measure, and I found their defense is average as grits... Yet by S&P measures they are 9!
Saleh's defense is modeled after Seattle, look at the impact Earl Thomas has in that scheme.
But, looking back at previous teams with the likes of Campbell, Keown and Dixon you can't help but think our current defense isn't up to scratch.
But when you look at the entire defense, the Falcons have the defensive edge, especially being at home.
The whole defense looked bad and the fact that he missed all of training camp and a good part of the season probably did not help it at all.
Badji has more shots yes and has been the more dangerous player, which is why I said I'd start him, but its not outrageous to suggest that Hudson could look at a given matchup and decide that Mason and Boli were better suited to attack the defense we'll be facing.
The tag gives us flexibility but honestly I look at the situation and think we would have been better served by releasing him and getting top tier - ILB AND S - We then could draft — WR, RB AND QB or simply more defense.
You look at the impact of Earl Thomas in that defense and that makes the case for Minkah.
A trade down to get to players on offense would be late teens to 20s and they could look at Daniels, Wynn and Moore on O, Oliver and Evans on D. Seems more likely they go defense early and trust in Shanahan's strengths in identifying players that fit his system with the later picks.
Gordon looks like he has come a long way in terms of his mental approach, but he used to stop playing defense if he wasn't having a good game at the other end.
A new GK is an absolute need, look at Man u their defense is average, our defenders individually are better than them except bailly but that freak they have in goal is hiding it.
Can't remember the last time I looked at the Arsenal squad and thought to miself: «Damn, we have solid defense, balanced midfield and lethal forwards.»
That Colorado has done a great job making Nashville's defense look silly at times.
I can't imagine the beating they're going to be putting on Jimmy Clausen after they shut down Forte, and Chicago's defense is bad enough that the Lions offense can look like they did a couple years ago, at least for a week.
It may not look like it at times watching certain attempts by unnamed folks, but even for someone who is strictly offense, they have learned a lot about defense from the few aces who have slowed and contained them.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z