Sentences with phrase «look at the game objectively»

Looking at the games objectively you find that we could have had a better away form than the results say.

But overall, it's pretty easy to see why this game got 10's if you look at the game objectively.

Trying to look at the game objectively at this point in the adventure, I'd actually like to take a more positive stance.

Not exact matches

Other than that, we're on a equal playing field with the rest of our schedule - not saying we're going to win all those games, but the pessimism seems to be more being jaded as a Bucs fan rather than objectively looking at the teams on our schedule.

It's about looking at how the game flows objectively, and that requires statistics and looking at the performance dispassionately.

Things like objectively looking at what the game does well and poorly, whether it provides what it promises in the marketing as per the pub / dev, and whether or not the game actually works or not, if it provides enough content, or if the story is good and well presented where applicable are simply side notes to the authors opinion.

Let's look objectively at 2 opposing opinions on how games can potentially run better on the One X than the PC, due in large to it's hardware and optimisation: Reviewer Jimmy Thang: «In terms of pure image fidelity, it surprisingly looked better than our high - end gaming PC equipped with a GTX 1080 running the game maxed out, as it offered extra dynamic shadows» N4G Commenter MagicBeanz: «It can't» I think I'll trust the reviewer's opinion, who's actually played and compared it, to yours

But I've decided to have a closer look at Nintendo's system, and see what they were offering a lot more objectively than simply saying, «Oh, there's no voice chat, in - game messaging, or achievement system.

Also, I love your ability to look at games that aren't coming out for 6 months «objectively».

But let's forget about all of that for a moment, and attempt to look at this game as honestly and objectively as possible.

I fear that any attempt I make to objectively look at a NES game's merits on the new system would eventually be tainted by this one glaring issue and my review would degenerate into criticism of the Virtual Console service and not the game itself.

The review reads like this game is a 6/10, maybe a 7/10 if looking at it as objectively as possible and divorcing the fact that the reviewer had fun despite the obvious glaring faults.

The difference between these indie games and their predecessors is that the Independent developers objectively look at these classic games and know how to improve on them without destroying what made them so wonderful in their prime.