Sentences with phrase «look at the logic»

Look at the logic and reason — you don't believe in them because you see no evidence of them; equally you can not disprove them.

Look at your logic folks its wrong.

So yes... when you look at the logic of it all then it appears that if we were to get Schneiderlin then it would be to convert him into a holding CM... Why do that when there are already top quality specialist DMs out there?

Pic - a-Pix Color is an interesting twist on the genre and creates an entirely new way to look at the logic puzzles.

Let's look at the logic of claiming that what I've said implies that cAGW might have an «efficient indicator» as reflected in 3.5 years..

I don't know whether that constitutes «rejection», or whether some other term is more appropriate, but let's look at the logic.

I took a look at their logic and arguments.

Not exact matches

Meantime, will American judges look at the British decision and apply that same logic here — where there are close to half a million Uber drivers?

In The Org: The Underlying Logic of the Office, Ray Fisman and Tim Sullivan take a look at what works at work and why.

«Any time you look at any kind of real life piece of text or utterance that one human wrote or said to another human, it's filled with analogies, modal logic, belief, expectation, fear, nested modals, lots of variables and quantifiers,» Lenat said.

Because humans are renowned for their imperviousness to logic (just look at basically any political discussion, if you need proof).

With that logic, it's hard to look at a company such as Roku and not see the same writing on the wall.

Let's now take a look at a list of five essential leadership communication skills - or rules, or logic, or whatever we wish to call these — to live by.

On the surface, this seems to make sense, but look at it from a different angle and the logic breaks down.

Content strategy will need to look at how to build logic and algorithm into the equation.

I had in my heart and tongue the Name of Allah when ever I had fears, troubles or depression of any kind but from Jan 05 1995 when had lost my father and second brother in a car accident, it was the time I really felt am alone at age of 33 to face all the challenges my father has left upon me to run and manage among other partners therefore had been investigating the Quran as to understanding every word of it rather than to memorize it, have been did a lot of reciting verses of prayers begging God to look upon me and give me strength... am sure through such difficult times if I had no faith in God I would have perished and lost every thing long ago... Another thing my heart always gave me signs and my mind gave me logic of what to believe although have read many books abroad in my youth of many beliefs out of curiosity but could not belief in other than that God is one and Muhammed is his last prophet in all belief of the Quran he brought upon me / us in all that it says... Should mention at times had experienced dreams seeing signs and warnings long in advance of things going to happen A year or more before losing my father in a car accident I had seen him in my dream good bye wearing white cloth and going to board a tourist ship all crew dressed in white uniform rolling a red carpet on front of him and when was on the top of the stairs weaver smiling good bye... seen in another dream how or wealth will be stolen and what I will hold... so many things like that..

There are often a lot of simple reasons rules existed in the older works if you look at them with logic and consider the populace and area they were enacted at the time.

HALF - FORMED IMAGINATIONS When I zoom out and look at Church history, I see a focus on left - brain logic during the modern era.

However, they have looked at many truths (facts based on physical evidence) and non existent physical evidence of any God and have made a personal decision that the existence of any God is highly improbable and defies almost all logic.

Only a person without logic could look at God's creation, could look at themselves, could look at the design of male and female and then stand back and say that it was just a big accident of time and chance.

As Pope Francis says in his robust critique of modern - day political economy, «unbridled capitalism» often promotes a «logic of profit at any cost» and «exploitation without looking at the person».

We will look at this point in later posts, but for now, we need to slow down and consider several steps within the Calvinistic logic which occasionally go unmentioned.

I could logic it all away, I know I could, but these moments are too much of a gift for me to look at straight on.

Let us begin by looking at certain aspects of Hegel's dialectical logic and attempting to make some determinations as to its nature and genesis.

It is not enough to simply look at figures to gain an understanding of how a system functions and its intrinsic logic.

They look for purpose and arrive at a conclusion based on available facts, reason, logic and life experience.

Once we have established the possibility of talking about God we need to look at (A) how the rules of logic apply to this use of language, and (B) what kind of verification is appropriate.

If you carefully and thoughtfully work through the logic James» argument up to this point, and then look at the objection, you must include all of James 2:18 - 19 in the objection.

Now, because is Christmas, put your hand in your heart and look at your God above and ask yourself what is more logic?

I Merely the look of it, buttercup at the edge of the «Lawn Falls» where the water seeps, sweeps down to the seaside is enough to carry the viewer in awe over the edge of reason to a logic beyond the modest mundane: the rocks being pitted are jointed by torrents of balm - like uproar.

Because what happens, again and again and again, is people listen to that logic, look at both sides of the issue, and say «Well then I guess I'm not a real Christian.»

I think one of the things about Christianity is that it is not simply a faith that you understand at a spiritual faith level, but in fact can be also justified through logic... You look at how Jesus fulfilled perfectly, to the letter, every single prophecy that was made of the coming Messiah.

Faith is the world's worst way of making decisions, which is why it's the only one religions have to rely on, because if you used any of the more reliable methods (like looking at the evidence, or logic, or confidence in something based on its past track record), you'd laff your head off at such nonsense and even more so at the solemn, self - righteous credulity of its proponents.

Thus one is forced to look mainly at the internal logic of Christianity, the legacy of Reformation Protestantism, and theological debates of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to understand what has shaped the character of American religion.

This article is about science and logic vs. the atheists based on science, scientific observation, logic, the limitations of science, and looking at both the past and the future.

It gets right behind the syntax - based, logic - based ways of looking at language.»

You «might» want to take a look at your reasoning and logic, as «others» have also challenged you here and on other articles, from what I've seen.

Anyone looking at real science and following real rules of logic can only reach agnostic, not theist or atheist.

only top club on planet subject to this kind of logic... the ostrich needs to get his head out of the f ****** sand and start looking at what we need to be serious challengers this year... clocks tcking

So if you want success, look at the bigger picture and realise that the only thing that you can and should do is support the club and stop pacifying your sensitive emotions with conspiracy theories about the board not really trying to win, which is just plain stupid if you think about it with any kind of logic.

Nothing intrinsically special about 10 years in footballing terms — I, admittedly with no better logic, look at the decades in terms of the 80s, 90s, 00s etc and feel better about us and we still have another 5 years to complete our history for this decade!

I'm sorry, but at this point it just looks like you are grasping at any excuse to call out Holland even if it goes against your own logic.

I written why I thought the authors post has failed in logic, I may be wrong but I did say that a Right sided AM or a player who could play their for us would be more of a logical choice when looking at Wenger and the type of players he likes to buy.

Wenger activiting Vardy's release clause, just goes to show that he isn't looking to sign a top top strike, So wheres the logic in looking at WC striker's now, when Wenger's first choice was a mere gap filler for Welbeck?

We have more problems than solutions, you all here are frustated and led by emotions, look logicly, our manager has 8m salary to do his job, while we spend our priceless time here on this forum, logic says look at table, look at players, look at salarys, our players do nt deserve that much money, cuz if you are overpaid you are expected to do thing other cant, correct?

If the logo is that Arsenal can finish top spot an injury ridden Spurs should by the same logic he capable of finishing 4th and if you look at it this is exactly how Spurs staffree last season and only fell off in the title race after they collapsed at Stamford Bridge.

Yesterday even with welbeck I thought one position which would be looked at purely for numbers sake was c.bk, just logic tells u lose 4 defenders and buy 2 erm that does nt add up but hey its wenger, gibbs, monreal evensuper jack can play c.bk lol,

Keep doing what your doing by using logic and analyzing a player instead of just looking at stats.

Looking at Van Gaal's logic he is right, they are favourites and I have a feeling they will be more motivated than us.

The sale makes the Gunners look even more like a selling - club and one has to wonder at the logic of selling to an arch rival, certainly it's something Sir Alex Ferguson wouldn't do.