Sentences with phrase «look operating margins»

In addition, it's a good idea to look operating margins (operating earnings divided by sales).

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
A closer look at Market Basket's operations under Arthur T. Demoulas suggests that its industry - beating 7.2 percent operating margins in 2012, cited by the Boston Business Journal, derive from six secrets: long - term employee relationships, low overhead, bulk purchasing, low prices, no debt and treating employees and customers like family.
This press release contains forward - looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements related to our expectations regarding: GAAP net revenue, GAAP gross margins, GAAP operating expenses, GAAP operating loss, GAAP tax expense, GAAP EPS, non-GAAP revenue, non-GAAP gross margins, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP tax rate, non-GAAP EPS, share count and cash.
Examples of forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make regarding the Company's plans, assumptions, expectations, beliefs and objectives with respect to store openings and closings; product introductions; sales; sales growth; sales trends; store traffic; retail prices; gross margin; operating margin; expenses; interest and other expenses, net; effective income tax rate; net earnings and net earnings per share; share count; inventories; capital expenditures; cash flow; liquidity; currency translation; growth opportunities; litigation outcomes and recovery related thereto; the collectability of amounts due under financing arrangements with diamond mining and exploration companies; and certain ongoing or planned product, marketing, retail, manufacturing, information systems development, upgrades and replacement, and other operational and strategic initiatives.
Looking at operating profit margins from continuing operations, we expect margin expansion of approximately 20 to 40 basis points on a full year basis compared to fiscal 2012 results.
The Street consensus was looking for about 13.7 in terms of operating margin, and so maybe it over-earned by $ 0.05, if the consensus would have been right, without the extra inventory and sales of those supplies.
Here's a first look at Spotify's Q1 earnings, which are in line with the guidance it offered up earlier this spring: In its first - ever quarterly report since going public last month, the streaming music company reported revenue of 1.14 billion euros, operating losses of 41 million euros, 75 million paid subscribers and a gross margin of 24.9 percent.
A brief look at the operating margins of the lithium ion battery manufacturers tells you batteries are a terribly low margin business driven by volume.
Most people just look at a company's margins and judge the quality of the business model based on that, but the cash flow characteristics of the business can make one company a far more valuable company than another with the exact same operating margin.
I reckon an 11 P / E, together with a 0.5625 P / S ratio (reflecting a 6.2 % operating margin), look about right now for OGN — and we can supplement that with a flip to a positive debt adjustment.
The top line continues to look attractive — with net revenue growing 17 % in constant currency terms, but the operating profit margin contracted to 18.4 %, while adjusted diluted EPS growth slowed drastically to 5 % (also on a cc basis).
Operating free cashflow margins continue to outpace operating profit — at 28.2 %, a 3.25 Price / Sales ratio still looks fair, while a substantial positive debt adjustment is clearly appropriate in light of the balance sheet strength & the ringing success to date of their Australian acqOperating free cashflow margins continue to outpace operating profit — at 28.2 %, a 3.25 Price / Sales ratio still looks fair, while a substantial positive debt adjustment is clearly appropriate in light of the balance sheet strength & the ringing success to date of their Australian acqoperating profit — at 28.2 %, a 3.25 Price / Sales ratio still looks fair, while a substantial positive debt adjustment is clearly appropriate in light of the balance sheet strength & the ringing success to date of their Australian acquisition.
If you assume a 9.7 % operating margin deserved a 1.0 P / S multiple, plus net cash & investments, you're looking at a value of $ 1.67 per share — remarkably similar to the buyout price].
Looking at their IPO prospectus suggests Escher can earn 30 % + operating margins.
Kentz» operating margin (adjusting for average minority interest in the past year) remains around 6.3 %, so a 0.6 Price / Sales ratio still looks about right, together with a substantial debt adjustment to reflect their financial strength (they're interested in acquisitions).
With the current operating profit margin at 16.5 %, last year's 1.75 Price / Sales ratio still looks valid.
Presuming (still a big presumption) this trend in cash generation is maintained, we're now looking at a 10.2 % operating FCF margin on $ 321 million of revenue — all things considered, that now deserves a 0.875 P / S multiple, to which we can obviously add surplus cash.
Of course, it looked cheap all the way down... Despite recent struggles, it has an extraordinary 38 % operating profit margin (and GBP 20 mo of cash), providing wonderful support for the current share price.
When looking at companies, it is extremely important that you compare the company's profit margin to the industry in which it operates.
If you look back to last year's TGISVP, I put a 4.5 P / S multiple on Tullow Oil (reflecting operating margins), a 3.5 P / S on Trinity Biotech (reflecting industry M&A multiples), and 3.25 P / S on Paddy Power (again, reflecting operating margins).
Annualized revenues are about the same & the operating free cashflow margin's at 7.5 %, so my 0.67 Price / Sales multiple still looks about right.
Let's look to operating margins instead: Since the company enjoys generous operating cash flows & limited net capex, we'll focus on FY - 2013 operating free cash flow of EUR 35 million.
That looks pretty rich when its operating free cash flow margin's averaged just 6.8 % in the past two years, while free cash flow was negligible.
But ultimately, Donegal's value isn't found in its earnings, its diversification, or even its core Produce division (whose operating margin has declined from 10 % five years ago, to losses today)-- it's found in its intrinsic value (a EUR 9.46 Base Case NAV still looks reasonable on a Sum - of - the - Parts basis), and more importantly, it's in the potential to wind - down its entire portfolio & progressively cannibalise its outstanding shares (thereby transforming DCP into a multi-bagger investment).
Also, with fast improving sentiment & even some economic momentum, there's an opportunity to selectively look back & incorporate prior peak operating margins / earnings as a component of some valuations.
Looking back to the admission document, it looks like Escher averages» round a 31 % operating margin, as you'd expect from a true software company.
Some people may find it hard to get their head» round using this metric, so let's look at it from a different perspective: Assume Company X has 100 in revenue, and an 11 operating margin.
When you examine them, they never look that cheap — for example, operating margin may be at 10 %, the company is priced as if it's at 12 %, but of course that might ultimately look cheap if management doubles operating margin to 20 %.
A question for Lainie specifically on the online margin, it looks the guidance is for down 200 basis points year - over-year and I was hoping if you could just give us an update on what you think for the company the potential long - term operating margins are for you maybe sort of timeframe or some milestones that you are thinking about achieving that?
«If you look across all three tenants... we're seeing a 50 - plus percent new - to - file, a 60 percent share - of - wallet increase, and 25 to 45 percent operating margin on the business.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z