Sentences with phrase «looks at formations»

Her new video looks at formations of gender - based expectations and includes footage of her niece at different ages of adolescence.
Howard's The Beatles looks at the formation and early years and colossal success of the Fab Four.
Of course there are other factors, players who are simply not good enough, zero tactical nous displayed by the manager and a thin squad but for the purpose of this article I will look at the formation.
My 15 year old kid looked at the formation and player lineup and ask me, «what the heck is this?»
I think there's going to be multiple camera vantage points looking at the formation from outside the stadium so people can see that either on TV or on the jumbotron.»
The team started by looking at the formation of the very small particles — a process called aerosol nucleation — by mimicking atmospheric conditions inside an ultraclean steel «cloud chamber», which Kirkby says is the cleanest ever created.
The researchers were looking at the formation of amorphous solids in general, and they used an experimental model system for hard spheres.
I am working toward using the James Webb Space Telescope — the Hubble replacement that should be up by 2014 — to look at the formation of galaxies in much greater detail.
The lesson looks at formation of the earth and key facts about the 4 layers of the earth.
It then looks at the formation of numbers 11 - 19.

Not exact matches

«If we look historically at periods when conditions fell into the most negative return / risk profile we identify (as they are at present), we find that top formations often involve extended runs of severely negative conditions.
Once familiarized with the pin bar formation, it is apparent from looking at any price chart just how profitable this pattern can be.
I think investors should be looking at coins / tokens they have operational and development confidence in that have put in strong bottom or double - bottom formations here in 2018 that are below the first Fibonacci level (23.6 %) as traced from their December high to their Q1 low.
This is accomplished by looking for the formation of at least one «higher low» to form within the base.
Speaking at the EU parliament last month, Draghi described more specifically which contingencies the ECB would be looking at in order to calibrate its next policy response: «First, we will examine the strength of the pass - through of low imported inflation to domestic wage and price formation and to inflation expectations.
When we take a look at the one year chart for gold, we can see a completed cup and handle formation.
Macro Factors Dominating Gold Price As US Dollar Outweighs Physical Demand And Investor Flows With gold trading in a narrow range below $ 1,300 and remaining relatively weak, it is worth pausing at this juncture to look at the combination of factors that are affecting its price formation.
To understand its ethos, we will look at the milieu in which it arose and the debates at a consultation in Singapore (1975) that led to its formation.
We will soon be releasing a study at LifeWay Research that looks at over 2500 people and tracks their spiritual formation over time (longitudinally) to answer that very question.
Returning to the square dance analogy, it is possible to look more closely at the eternal objects of the calls as instantiated in these dance formations.
This chapter addresses the latter question by looking at the role played by religious pluralism and law in the formation of America's civil religion.
CLA was discovered by accident in 1978 by Michael W. Pariza at the University of Wisconsin while looking for mutagen formations in meat during cooking.
If you have a look at the evolution of formations within the EPL then you will find that Wenger has changed his formation pretty quick compared to other managers but not a flip flop manager.
Might end up looking like the Che formation at times, if Alexis played no10 it could look allot like C
Look at the heat maps for our 3 behind the front man in any given game and it is often difficult to tell what position they were «assigned» on the team / formation sheet.
We've started to look at the safety car restart procedures, different grid formations for the start - things like that can very easily translate from F2 to F1.»
Hopefully the Manager, coaching staff, and players, have looked at that, and we will not go gung - ho for the equaliser, but rather stick to our formation and play ourselves back in, aware of the counter attacks should we get caught too high up.
Looking at the strange 4 -3-2-1 formation the ex-Barca boss played, it's clear that there was no width in their attack and therefore the same kind of predictable, narrow, slow, passing football that Chelsea soaked up against Guardiola's side at the Nou Camp in 2012.
Hope you haven't forgotten that Wenger doesn't look at the opposition's players, formation or tactics.
Here is a look at 15 incredible Premier League legends who helped Chelsea achieve greatness since the formation of the League.
I think Aubameyang and Beloti are the Best option for now if we really want to spend big at least, since we changed into this formation 3.4.2.1, we look solid, Beloti may be more realistic than Aubameyang, if you noticed, a pacy striking force makes us press high on opponents, but if we give him up to 230 wages per week and buy him for 50 - 55 million pounds i think Aubameyang would come, but if not Beloti is the perfect other option.
In a slightly odd - looking 3 -1-4-2 formation, here's CaughtOffside's effort at getting the best players Mourinho has wortked with together in one lineup!
However, as we all know, Wenger always sticks to the same formation regardless of the opposition, and therefore Coquelin's future opportunities look very limited at Arsenal.
An innovator in pass - first offenses for years, BYU's experimented with tempo and new formations, something I looked at with jealousy when Ohio State's QB play wasn't very good.
You need to look at what's best for our team and that's been the 4 -2-3-1 formation.
Although not outstanding the South American has looked solid enough at right wing - back in this new look formation, which is probably because Valencia has previous experience playing in defence.
Let's look at what has unfolded this season: - NO tactical flexibility, playing against top teams or bottom ones we play the same 4 -2-3-1 formation.
Did nt like the 4141 formation at all in the past, but now looks the best way to accommodate some players and am delighted with how well we have played lately using it.
i was very impressed with coquelin but we could all see the way newcastle was fowling him im worried it only a matter of time before his injured so we need suffcient cover arteta is ok but if something happens to coquelin (i pray it doesn't) where his out for a couple of games arteta can not play a bunch of games for 90 mins all the time so im hoping arsene is looking at a DM has we speak also on theo, to be fair to him he actually did ok great movement but it brings me to think that giroud and walcott can play together in a 442 formation because giroud can provided the hold up play for walcott to make runs and walcott can make the runs to allow space for giroud if walcott has gioroud finishing and giroud walcott pace we properly would be with man city at the top of the league
When you are conscious of formation you easily know where to send your pass, when you look at your mates you know whom to pass the ball to.
If we put him up with Giroud or Welbeck or Sanchez up front we'll be looking at the 4 -4-2 he played at Leicester, which would mean shifting our formation, that's been standing still for the past 10 years.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Lets take a look at Wenger's recent (upto 1 - 2 years something) decisions regarding team formation and players in starting 11.
Arsene Wenger needs to take a look at his tactics and formation, much like Antonio Conte did after we beat Chelsea back in September, which led to their amazing string of wins which propelled them to the top of the table, and now look assured champions this term.
A complete rehaul of the squad could also mean looking at changing the system and formation we currently rely on, which may well change the dynamic of the role in which the Ox currently occupies in, although he has done well in a more advanced role this term also.
It may make more sense to consider the direction in which Wenger may go, and I would not be surprised to see Conte's Chelsea formation adopted, so we could look at our strongest XI in that system.
We have the quality in so many places but I don't know what exactly is missing at the moment we don't look as if we believe we can win it and there isn't a formation cure for that... it's a mental thing..
Arsenal have changed their formation from a classic 442 to more of a 4231 over the years, but our current three at the back system looks revolutionary for the Gunners.
Should we look at playing a similar formation to the league leaders?
Dalton not only had 50 college games and 1,317 college passes on his résumé when the NFL took a close look at him before the draft last spring; he also had several summers of throwing the ball in multiple formations, reading coverages and learning to trust his arm and his head.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z