Sentences with phrase «looks dangerous changes»

(2017), which looks dangerous changes in wheat production (both not rated).

Not exact matches

Perez gets brought on for the last 8 minutes, would've scored a goal, had it not been hand balled away by a hull defender, looked more dangerous and committed than Walcott did in 70 minutes, changed the complexion of the game and he wasn't fit to start that game????? You don't need to a physio to tell that, you just need a pair of eyes.

Hodgson may change his team's shape to allow him to play Liverpool wonderkid Raheem Sterling through the middle, where the teenager looks so dangerous.

In mitigation, they had had to chop and change personnel - the injured Georginio Wijnaldum was a particular loss; his replacement Emre Can looked off the pace - with goalkeeper Loris Karius then reacting sharply to shovel away Rashford's dangerous low, outswinging cross as Ibrahimovic waited to pounce.

«If you're wondering why so many politicians and news sources deny that dangerous human - caused climate change is real, and you want a relatively short and easy - to - read summary of the issue, look no further than The Madhouse Effect»

As the impacts of climate change become more pronounced in coming years, BECCS and other negative emissions technologies are looked to as a means of avoiding dangerous future climate scenarios by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

And, these «standards» are literally IMPOSSIBLE to attain.Attempting to look like these women, whose images have been drastically changed, is a futile, dangerous, and potentially fatal mission.

Dangerous hobbies and activities will also change how the insurer looks at your risk profile.

They stopped short of making changes to pit bulls, specifically, but the court attorney's office and animal control officials are looking for ways to better protect the public from dangerous dogs.

on a side note, i hope future games adopt sackboy's ability to change facial expressions during gameplay by using the dpad... its fun to get to a dangerous area, press left and look scared, get trough it and smile all in game..

McIntyre, so the story goes, is looking for answers from only the purest motives but uncovers a web of deceit designed to affirm foregone conclusions whether they're so or not — that humankind is creating dangerous climate change, the likes of which hasn't been seen for at least a thousand or two years.

If environmental groups and their backers want to see concrete progress on limiting the risk that humans will propel dangerous global warming, they may need more than just additional money and better organization, but also a hard look at core strategies and a philosophy that has long cast climate change as primarily a conventional pollution problem, not a technology problem.

People look at the same graph and some see dangerous global warming, while others see climate change as always has taken place.

«All countries are going to need to increase their ambition a decade after that because, when we look at keeping the world safe from dangerous climate change, you know, we realise we've got about half of the agreed reductions we need.»

The authors look closely at the claim of a «scientific consensus» that most of the climate change that occurred in the past 50 years was due to human activity and that future climate change will be dangerous.

What, as we look forward from Kyoto, do we know Only that the question is no longer if we can avoid dangerous climate change (time's up on that account) but rather if we can avoid catastrophic climate change.

It assumes that atmospheric levels of CO2 equivalents can not rise above 450 parts per million if we are to avoid «dangerous» climate change of more than 2 ºC and then looks at the mitigation that policy - makers would need to pursue to achieve that.

What would accelerating, dangerous and unequivocal temperature change look like?

We're looking at a future of seas climbing up our shores; devastating floods, droughts, and storms becoming more frequent facts of life; seasons changing beyond recognition; and dangerous consequences for our health we're only beginning to understand.

ok, I am confused here as I thought the high levels of saturated fat being good for you had become an accepted notion a year or so back and we were all to avoid even looking at sugar as that was now thought to be as dangerous as climate change.

The Global Calculator uses data reviewed by international experts to look at scenarios for meeting the 2C target, which scientists say is needed to avoid dangerous climate change.

Now consider how this looks to people on the outside of it who just want to know if dangerous climate change is real or hype?

Forward - looking businesses are harnessing climate action as a driver of innovation, competitiveness, risk management and growth, while delivering the emissions reductions needed to avoid dangerous climate change.

Regarding long term outcomes, I tend to agree with flxible that even short term outcomes don't look good but it seems to me that Wasdell is at least showing that if the international community wants to avoid 2C (because of some arbitrary idea of where dangerous climate change will kick in, agreed on years ago) then it can't do it without removing atmospheric greenhouse gases and so any notion that some emissions reduction agreement can do the trick are delusions.

In 2005 the UK Government hosted the Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change conference to take an in - depth look at the scientific issues associated with climate cChange conference to take an in - depth look at the scientific issues associated with climate changechange.