Sentences with phrase «looks less mean»

Though it looks less mean than the interceptor version, this vehicle isn't just a Fusion plug - in with a special badge.

Not exact matches

These changes mean you'll have to grow a lot more with a lot less and make it look twice as good.

While a hungry child is less likely to be able to focus, most of the research looks at kids who are part of school breakfast programs, which means the majority of those kids come from underprivileged backgrounds and may not be getting enough to eat in general.

It's not as high - end as a Yeti cooler, and it's not meant to be — Eddie Bauer gets the job done for less than $ 50 and looks pretty good doing it.

Millennials, in particular — who are less likely to be married, less likely to belong to organized religion, and less likely to join outside organizations than previous generations — increasingly look to employers to give their lives purpose, meaning, and a moral anchor.

Collaboration may look less productive by traditional measures — which may mean we have to discover new ways of proving the business value of collaborative environments.

Small caps (Russell 2000) and to a lesser extent Nikkei and EM equities in stocks all have below - average vol and correlations today to S&P 500; makes index hedges cheaper, although the lower level of realized volatility means consensus is looking for an even better entry point to buy equity vol.»

«And that means you're going to get even less investment, because they are looking at future tax rates.»

As I've noted before, for an investor looking to capture all the market's long - term returns with substantially less downside risk, it would actually have been enough, historically, to simply step out of the market on a price / peak multiple of 19 and then wait for a 30 % plunge before repurchasing stocks, even if that meant staying out of the market for years in the interim.

«Right now when you look at [open source blockchain startups such as] Ethereum — these are LGPL [Lesser General Public License] based licences, which means that if you are to use it and use derivative works you have to give it back to the owner.

Lehman treated the transactions as sales rather than as debt, which meant the firm looked as if it had less debt than it actually did.

If we are creating a culture in which we get noticed because of our flirting or our looks, it means that others are not getting noticed because they are deemed less «fun» or good - looking.

I mean, you weren't spinning to make things look less clear than they are, were you Seth?

Unity comes, when one does not look at the text, with the idea that it means «x», and only «x», with zero possibility that any other meaning is possible, much less probable.

God could had it been both ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

God could had creation either ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

In any case, thoughtful people in these churches where the language of survival has been less urgent — and such thoughtful people are legion — are asking questions of meaning which show that they too are «bothered» and have to look at «what's ahead.»

He looked at me as if I was completely barmy, it would be expensive and would mean the crops being less productive.

In addition to organic, you'd ideally look for coffee that's mycotoxin free (a toxin produced by mold) and / or shade grown (meaning they need less chemicals to grow the coffee).

I mean really, the channel seems to be less and less about good food, and more and more about over-the-top personalities (I'm looking at you Guy Fieri).

Your photos look gorgeous and even though there are less nothing is lost... if you know what I mean.

Today, many consumers are also looking for products that show environmental responsibility through reduced or improved packaging, which means less packaging waste and spoiled foods in our landfills.

This will change the flavor and look of the product but could also make it less bioavailable — meaning that your body will have greater difficulty in using the nutrients that the supplement should be providing.

That means a team with less salary cap space might actually be better at managing contracts but because of lesser a lesser cap they will look to be overspending.

This could mean staying at the club and accepting lesser game time or looking for new pastures.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

They could be looking at a lot less money, which means a much lower cap.

The four - man defense with Koscielny in it is continuing to look a tighter, meaner and more less breached side.

Bendtner or Chamakh would still have been considered average even if they scored 25goals because they had average talent.For all the potential Bendtner had he never maximised it so as long asit wasn't developed he's still average.I mean it's possoble for an average player to score 25 goals when given the chances and possible for a world class striker to score less than that.Quality is a talent which may be linked to stats but does not necessarily show on stats.Take Ox for example, if you looked at his stats you might think he's average but he's not.Look at Lukaku, he's scored many goals for Everton yetmany people here think he's not gpod enough for Arsenal because they look at the quality and talent andnot just the goals.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

I would much rather look like an asshole who prematurely talked about death penalties if it meant MSU wasn't doing the things it looks like they're doing because that would mean fewer victims and less trauma.

If you look at the playmaker's stats and heat map in the Daily Mail it is clear that playing in the middle did not mean he had less work to do either.

When there was a bounty of starters on the free agent market — Johnny Cueto, David Price, Zack Greinke, Jeff Samardzija — it looked like the Tigers nabbed the best mix of risk vs. reward, paying less for Zimmermann than the Giants paid for Cueto, which meant paying half the price of a... Price.

I do not want to see Wenger stay around and make our quality players look worse and eventually consistently playing at a lower level of form means they become thought of as lesser players, actions speaking.

Not that that necessarily means anything in the world of Formula 1, but seeing the Spaniard back in red looks less than likely after comments like that.

Despite their miraculous campaign so far, I still feel like City and sadly — Spurs look like the biggest title threat so far, and I'm hopeful that the Mahrez - Vardy party will continue for two more rounds, because our own inconsistency means we must hope that others will also drop points against the lesser sides.

Lesser campaigns from that trio, plus Greinke looking more like his problematic 2016 self than his 2017 one, means suddenly the lineup is really going to notice the absence of J.D. Martinez, because the runs it can score are not enough often enough — especially in a division that not only features the Dodgers and Rockies, but also the revitalized Giants.

look man i understand that you say ozil in the middle means no protection or less than adequate but ozil will be CAM and he is close to scoring a tap - in rather than giving shield to arteta who is an unreliable source and does not deserve the captaincy, wenger only gave it to him cause he gave the players some papering over the cracks statements after the Liverpool, chelsea and man city match and the player does not even have a cap for the national team Wenger may have seen this as a player who can play in and out with no internationals regardless of his qualities on the pitch and the main reason why he sold vermaelen who would have done decent job at CDM and then all that fluid style that arsene thinks he can play dictate «arrogance»!

If you look around you, the fact that the Premier League is so demanding means the young boys are very quickly under pressure, and that's why you maybe see less of them appear.

This could end up meaning the game is a little less exciting than some people hope, as the Blues look to pick their moments, unless there's an early goal really open things up.

It might make you believe that it's made of 100 % soybean foam, but if you look at the label, the foam is 73 % polyurethane, meaning the composition is likely less than 25 % soy foam.

Your hair may also change texture and you may lose less hair meaning that your hair looks thicker and shinier than normal.

Some parents always seek to be original and look for strange or less known names, but with deep and beautiful meanings.

Once I finally stopped listening to the well - meaning experts and looking at the clock and I let her feed whenever she wanted, we were both happier and she was much less colicky.

I think that honestly, now that I look back on it, the priority needs to be the toddler because they're taking in so much and as long as the baby, the new born is nursed and happy, I really recommend baby wearing for this because the, you know, the baby is going to be happy and content in there and just giving that attention to your toddler because you'll notice less tantrums, less fits, a happier toddler means a happier house.

I mean we look around the room where you are and everyone is breastfeeding and so we forget those that in the State of California by the time you are three and four months out of delivery, very, you know, less than half of the population is actually breastfeeding.

But many people will be deciding how to cast their vote on the basis of what sort of a country we are - and if you look through all the chaos that the polls throw up, this ultimately means whether the country will be more or less fair in the EU.

Looking backwards it means that over this period looser fiscal policy would almost certainly have been offset by tighter, or less loose, monetary policy.

Look for Skelos to back pedal on everything to which he committed if it means a dime less for LI schools in his member's districts.

But after the Clegg surge, those potential gains from the Lib Dems look far less likely, meaning that the Conservatives probably need to make 120 gains from Labour and fight the Lib Dems to a draw, thereby still securing enough seats for an overall majority.