Sentences with phrase «lose other points»

Obtain the minimum points to win by 1 vote on each state (51 %), then lose every other point with 0 votes (0 %).

Not exact matches

Amid the toughest stretch of the Cavs» season in which the team has lost five of their last six games, blame has reportedly been passed around the locker room, with players pointing fingers at each other, the coaching staff, Cavs ownership, and most recently, Kevin Love.

In the other 8 cases, the incumbent party lost, including at least 3 of the biggest political turning points in US history (1860, 1932, 1980).

Topol pointed out that currently there's a ton of «information blocking» going on by health providers that don't» want to share data with others for fear of losing their patients (i.e. business).

At a time when analysts are concerned that Verizon (vz) may be losing its advantage of having the highest quality wireless network, the carrier is looking to «differentiate from competition» in other ways, McAdam said, pointing to the Internet video offers from the other carriers.

And that's how, over time, you can lose a few percentage points of fat even if you don't change your exercise routine and don't change what you eat; keep all the other variables consistent and intermittent fasting will cause you to lose fat.

Lululemon and other stalwarts of the «athleisure» craze will lose market share as people who actually exercise realize there's no point in working out in expensive clothes.

Points expiration / losing points: Your points don't expire as long as your account remains open, however, you will immediately lose all your points if your account status changes, or your account is closed for program misuse, fraudulent activities, failure to pay, bankruptcy, or other reasons described in the terms of the Rewards Program AgrePoints expiration / losing points: Your points don't expire as long as your account remains open, however, you will immediately lose all your points if your account status changes, or your account is closed for program misuse, fraudulent activities, failure to pay, bankruptcy, or other reasons described in the terms of the Rewards Program Agrepoints: Your points don't expire as long as your account remains open, however, you will immediately lose all your points if your account status changes, or your account is closed for program misuse, fraudulent activities, failure to pay, bankruptcy, or other reasons described in the terms of the Rewards Program Agrepoints don't expire as long as your account remains open, however, you will immediately lose all your points if your account status changes, or your account is closed for program misuse, fraudulent activities, failure to pay, bankruptcy, or other reasons described in the terms of the Rewards Program Agrepoints if your account status changes, or your account is closed for program misuse, fraudulent activities, failure to pay, bankruptcy, or other reasons described in the terms of the Rewards Program Agreement.

It keep us from losing touch with the whole point of this — to live the life we want, doing what we love, with other passionate people.

The price is steep for entry at this point, and one needs faith that most people are not interested in losing the money they've invested at this and other levels over the past 4 months.

The Dow Jones industrial average lost 368 points, or 1.8 percent to 20,611, as a broad array of other indexes all lost ground.»

And of course the whole point is not to share with others what isn't real or true for you, a point that is not lost on super pastor Rob as we return to the dilemma of living an honest faith when you become the latest pastor in demand.

He suggests two other points of view, and proposes that the chaplain be their advocate in the professional mix: a focus on meaning, arguing that the mentally ill have lost or have never found meaning in life (Tillich, Frankl); and a focus on morals, suggesting that a violation of moral obligation or social responsibility accounts for mental distress (Mowrer, Boisen).

The other turkeys know the end is coming one day but don't see the point in losing your head or...

The point of all this is that dominance is the one animal instinct the human race either inherited from its primate forebears and retained after losing all the other instincts, or acquired by imitating this animal behavior when the human race fell from a higher nature.

In other words, if we take such things as points of agreement, practice, feelings, etc., as the determining factors in what constitutes the true connection between you and your Wiccan friend, then the connection is lost.

The other side of this same point is that by ignoring the particular settings in which Scripture is read we risk losing the richness that varying perspectives may bring to our understanding of the truth of Scripture.

The sticking point in all of this is that when it comes to contested issues of moral value, one side wins and the other loses.

A point that the preacher is making may catch their attention, but while they are responding to it, he moves on so rapidly to other points that they lose the thread of his thought.

The other turkeys know the end is coming one day but don't see the point in losing your head or getting your feathers in a knot over it.

It's a classic moment in Lost history because it perfectly encapsulates John and Jack's characters, and because it points to a predicament to which we can all relate: Some of us really struggle to accept things on faith, while others seem to find it easy.

To put the point another way, if 9/11 drove to church for weeks on end millions of Americans who had not darkened that doorstep in years — as it did — imagine the even deeper impact on ordinary mothers and fathers of a sick child or the similarly powerful desire of a devoted spouse on the brink of losing the other.

They often point out that if the Moscow Patriarchate loses Ukraine, and especially if Ukraine goes back to Constantinople, its pretensions to power and influence among the other Orthodox churches will be severely compromised.

this is an old argument which delusional theists have lost already, so i don't intend to expound on it further other than to point out once more — you're wrong.

The Metropolitan pointed out that there was a need to find a new motivation for mission and evangelism other than «lostness» of the so called «lost».

Whiteheadians might encounter a dilemma at this point, wishing to affirm, on the one hand, God's «tender loving care that nothing be lost,» and wishing to uphold, on the other hand, the tendency of creaturely freedom to resist any kind of ultimate unanimity.

I have christian friends from other churchs and there women do these things and they do it because that is how they interpret the word.Its optional and not inforced by the church or by there husbands.They do it as an act of worship to the Lord.The point is how you interpret the word that was what i was getting at as we know the word is the inspired word of God to understand it we need the inspiration of the holy spirit otherwise the word is dead and brings no life.In the case of mother etta she was called to preach and God used her as an evengelist in her day her ministry grew she witnessed to thousands she healed the sick and saved the lost you can argue over a point but the proof is there that God uses women just as he uses men in ministry today.

A point I could never get Alexandria to understand with her exclusionist, only those truly in the Spirit agree with her and all others are lost, belief system.

That path required reform - through - retrieval, the recovery of an element of the tradition of which the Church had lost sight: namely, Pope Gelasius's distinction between, and affirmation of, «two authorities» in the world that should not be thought identical, or even too closely enmeshed with each other (a point underscored by Gregory VII in the Investitute Controversy).

The current game of «Capture the Flag» is a case in point, with one side arguing «my country right or wrong» and the other side arguing «America: change it or lose it.»

Baking by weight is definitely the way to go, and you and I and lost of other people up there (I need an arrow pointing upwards to those previous comments) know why.

It was the third time in four years that a Fisher team has lost by 30 - plus points, but whereas the other two came against Heisman winners and good teams — Oregon in 2014, Louisville in 2016 — this one came against... Boston College.

Chelsea can afford to lose points and will still be smiling because other teams esp Arsenal won't capitalise.

How would you like to go into a game knowing that you were supposed to lose by so much and score X amount of points to an X-plus amount by the other team — and then have it happen?»

Those are the games we should be expected to lose points.15 points to play for against the top 6 teams, at least get 9 points from 15 and beat all the other «small» teams.

But in the other eight games it analyzed it was 100 % correct (Spencerian won four and lost four, all as predicted) and was never more than three points off the final margin of victory.

They finished just 7 - 6, but they played really well in one particular loss (Oregon), lost two other games (to Boise State and California) by six or fewer points, and played at the 91st percentile or higher in six of seven wins.

We haven't seen the latter since 2013, when the Cardinal lost three games by a combined 13 points, won the other 11 games by a combined 199, and ranked fourth in S&P +.

but a t some point he lost it, and is not because of his stinginess to buy players, our core is good and has been for sometime now, his biggest problem was adaptation, change to the new EPL, his philosophy dating back 20 years does not work anymore and he knows it, because of this his biggest flaw all others came out to light, lack of rotation of his players favoring some over others, stubbornness that applies to his transfer policy buying for the future just as he had 20 more years ahead, players playing out of their natural positions, ARSENAL FLOPS who knows under other Managers they could have been great, for some reason they were signed in the first place, they must had some talent, best example is Campbell....

They complain when we drop out the top 4 but they want us to lose games that could potentially get us back in the top 4 providing other teams drop points.

And by a decimal point, the team that lost to two of the other great teams finished ahead of the pack in S&P +.

We will get a point vs manure and even if we lose we will win our other 2 games and get that 3rd spot.

In other words, these are years in which the losing team would've been favored by at least three points if the game had been played after bowl season:

The magical healing powers that you and many others seem to expect are largely out of her control at this point in time - it feels a little like meeting with a nutritionist for a week and being upset when you don't lose 20 pounds.

But I've yet to see anybody who's really, really confident either Alabama or Ohio State has hands - down earned the No. 4 spot... other than Big Ten commish Jim Delany, who likes the fact that Ohio State played a lot of Power 5 teams, or Nick Saban, who likes the fact that he didn't lose a game by 30 points, that is.

One way to look at the value of turnovers is to hone in on the value (in equivalent points) of the field position lost by one team and gained by the other.

Actually, when the Venezuela players held the East - West cards in the other room they were allowed to play at six hearts doubled, losing 300 points, so the winners gained 380 points, worth 9 IMPs.

Some naysayers could put forward the view that Arsenal lost two points in the draw at Stoke, but Petr Cech is the type of player whose glass is always half - full and he has persuaded the other Gunners that it is a point gained in our race for the title.

cause even the goal difference isnt such a problem, if we want to go top the would have to lose 2 games and if they lose 2 games the difference in gd would sink atleast to just 3 between us and then if we win the games it would sink to atleast 1 so if we score 2 goals more than them in the other 6 games of us we would be top, well as long as spurs give up 4 points and i strongly believe that they will lose points, cause they are beatable cause they wont play like leicester only on the break but would also want to dominate some games and against liverpool / southampton that will be dangerous

«Now it's not possible to win just our games [and that to be enough] so other teams need to lose points as well.