Sentences with phrase «lose out of benefits»

Not exact matches

Women, black and Latino employees also lose out on pay raises, bonuses, stock options, benefits and other wages because of the company's discriminatory practices, the lawsuit alleges.

If Cali pays out tons into federal coffers and Alabama receives that, then Cali loses real earnings regardless of what investment levels are unless it's infrastructure spending, in which case it's not a zero - sum game where everyone can benefit.

You might lose out on some of the government benefits, but those benefits are small and your accumulated assets within your RRSP should be quite substantial.

Thus, the rural and urban poor are much less likely to marry and stay married than their middle - and upper - class peers, therefore losing out on the social, economic, and moral benefits of marriage.

When Bertie and Don introduced this more defensive line up and Armstrong became more of right sided midfielder we lost our width and with that the benefit of Jon's long rang passing which was what had made him stick out.

Against Hull City he'd looked like a blockage in the hole denying the Armenian space to come inside, whereas in the City match, Rooney seemed keener to vacate the space as he roamed deeper, even if the former Borussia Dortmund attacker was too out - of - sorts to see the benefit, clumsily losing possession and failing to make any real impact on the game — not something the United skipper struggled to do.

I'm 22 years of age, and from the moment I found out I was pregnant (at 16 wks) I knew I wanted to breastfeed for the following reasons: easier once established, cheaper, lose pregnancy weight quicker, benefits for baby and benefits for myself and also my mother breastfed me and my 2 siblings.

Regardless of how wonderful it can turn out to be, breastfeeding is by no means easy, despite the many amazing benefits — health benefits for baby and mom, losing that baby weight without dieting, bonding, etc..

What a shame to have lost our partner's ideas and perspectives when ultimately we could benefit and celebrate the fact that we have someone who is as interested and committed to the raising of our children as we are — someone who is willing to go out on a limb and share a new perspective that could benefit the whole family.

I give these readers my best advice, of course, but lately I've been yearning to show them the bigger picture: how these problems came to be, who benefits from the status quo (even as our kids lose out), and what we — both as individuals and as a society — could be doing to make a real difference in the lives and health of all American children.

In response to the news item, Rush Limbaugh had a particularly offensive broadcast (although with El Rushbo, it's kinda hard to make such distinctions) in which he opined that «one of the benefits of school being out [is]... your kids losing weight because they're starving to death out there because there's no school meal being provided» He then suggested, among other things, that hungry kids should Dumpster - dive for food.

Your baby does not lose out on most of the nutrients and benefits of breast milk.

- A compulsory jobs guarantee — a paid job for every young person out of work for 12 months or more and over 25 unemployed for over two years — which they will be obliged to take or face losing benefits;

Those who do not complete a weekly timetable of tasks could find themselves losing out on benefits as a result.

Should they pull out of the placement after more than a week has elapsed, for whatever reason, they can lose their benefits.

«in fact Michelle Mitchell is just plain wrong in saying that all the elderly on housing benefit will lose out — 32 % of all those on housing benefit will not lose out...»

I wouldn't support, for example, the abolition of tax credits without making sure that no - one lost out (which, going about it by changing the tax system and raising universal benefits would be very, very expensive).

In order to understand which groups lose under the programmes and which are likely to be exempted from intrusive conditions and why, we might need to delve into domestic data more deeply and lay out the changes to material conditions of different groups and cuts in social benefits.

The government could make freedom of movement work better for everyone by sharing the benefits fairly and making sure nobody loses out.

Under his plans, people out of work for over three years or more will be forced to take on community work, visit job centres every day, undergo mandatory training and therapy sessions, or face losing their benefits.

As part of the Home Office crackdown, people have lost out on jobs, benefits and access to vital healthcare - with some even being forced into homelessness.

Labour has attacked the coalition for the «unfairness» of the cut, pointing out that two parents with a combined income of # 87,998 can still receive the benefit if neither earns over # 44,000 - while a single parent earning just over the limit will lose all their child benefit.

The major policy announcement on free school meals was the obvious move in this direction — as well as being a sop to middle class voters who lost out after cuts to child benefit — but Nick Clegg's speech is full of references to policies which help in day - to - day life: the pupil premium, flexible parental leave, free childcare, a cap on social care costs.

If the study determines some city workers would lose their jobs, the agency must then look at the benefits and costs of contracting out the work and submit that analysis to the city comptroller, who reviews city contracts.

That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Welfare Benefits Up - rating Bill because it fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000Benefits Up - rating Bill because it fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000 a year.

A significant number of people will lose their eligibility for housing benefit, council tax benefit and out - of - work benefits.»

Tory sources have played down the idea of this tax plan being used to compensate stay at home mothers who will lose their child benefit, but they have not ruled out the idea entirely.

5.25 pm: David Cameron has not ruled out using the tax system to partially compensate families who will lose out from the loss of child benefit.

11.06 am: Alan Duncan, the international development minister, told Sky that many parents who will lose out from the abolition of child benefit for higher - rate taxpayers do not really need the money.

What was particularly interesting, though, was the suggestion that stay - at - home mums who will lose out from the child benefit decision could be compensated by the introduction of transferable tax allowances.

In opposing the cuts Labour mustn't allow themselves to become too closely associated with the benefit recipients losing out from cuts, or the trade unions striking against them (hence, of course, Ed Miliband's focus on the «squeezed middle»)

They conclude that, while some species in some areas will benefit, 79 % of the species native to the region will lose out.

«In terms of practical nature conservation, these results signify that in the future it will no longer be sufficient to preserve small, isolated reserves — while these benefit specialized species with a simple genetic structure, the bulk of species that depend on an exchange between local populations will lose out in the medium to long term,» predicts Schmitt, and he adds in closing, «This will lead to a further decline of numerous insect species — with dramatic consequences for entire food webs and ecosystems.»

The few who stand to benefit from such policies can nonetheless lose out to other strong interests, as happened when a proposal to increase high - skill visas — at the expense of visas devoted to increasing cultural diversity — failed in Congress late in 2012.

When you change your eating and lifestyle habits for good and realize that being healthy truly is a way of life, you are rewarded with so many incredible benefits to your body — it becomes easier for you to lose weight, you're able to maintain a healthy weight without restricting food or resorting to liquids only or taking out major food groups (unless, of course, you have an allergy or intolerance), you feel increased and sustained energy throughout the day, your digestion becomes more regular, your mood is more elevated, you have control of your cravings rather than vice versa, and so, so much more.

I am vegan but want the benefits of the gelatin as my skin has lost much of its tightness and my joints are worn out!!

The Low - Fat Scrambled Egg Debacle Benefits of Krill Oil For Fat Metabolism How to Stay Motivated — Even When You Stop Losing Weight Swap Out These 3 Problems To Lose Fat Faster The 15 Rules to Greater Fat Loss Has Your Diet Failed You?

By the way, make sure you've tried out Shaun Hadsall's awesome 14 - day Stubborn - Fat Protocol here (it's FREE) if you want to get max benefits from a unique sprint style of training and lose that last bit of lower abdomen fat.

Now those eating plant - based diets have the unfair advantage of being so much slimmer, so they found omnivores who were as skinny as vegans to see if plant - based diets had a direct benefit, as opposed to indirectly pulling fat out of the muscles by helping people lose weight in general.

It will force you lose out on the benefit of sustained continued effort.

Because of the misinformation we have been given for years, we have lost out on the healthy benefits that coconut oil has given the people of the tropics for centuries.

Otherwise you'll miss out on the long term health benefits, and of course gain back all the weight you lost too.

These mechanics include things like stance - switching (high, mid, and low stances for each weapon offer different benefits and penalties), carefully managing your «Ki» (stamina) so that you don't run out in the middle of a battle and leave yourself wide open to a counter-attack, and mastering the use of the «Ki Pulse» technique (a well - timed button press which allows you to instantly recover lost Ki).

We do lose the benefit of their training and experience, but we avoid staffing important positions with people who have sub-par performance because they are burnt - out.

DB plans remain the norm in the public education sector, however, despite the fiscal problems and the weak economic rationale for mobile professionals like teachers, many of whom move out of state or out of the profession and lose much of their accumulated benefits.

Among them are deleterious effects on children of unregulated and often substandard childcare; [9] lost productivity for employers due to parents missing work to handle gaps in childcare or to care for a sick child; [10] lost wages and reduced retirement benefits for parents who have to drop out of the labor market to provide at - home care for their young children; [11] a substantial downward pressure on the wages of childcare workers with effects on the quality and stability of the childcare workforce; [12] and lost opportunities for further education, [13] college savings, and other investments that working parents could make in themselves and their children but can not afford because they are spending most or all of their disposable income on childcare.

They want teachers to be able to opt out of supporting political activities without losing their union membership, voting rights and benefits.

The vast majority are losing out in terms of retirement benefits, and all of them are losing out because their employers have to keep paying down pension debts.

At the point when RWA's behavior crosses over from the mere setting of standards for individual authors» benefit, into trying to force Harlequin to adopt a business model that pays all its authors a minimum advance of $ 1000, you cross from rule - of - reason antitrust territory (translation: plaintiff loses) into per - se illegality (translation: plaintiff wins), at which point all questions about market effect go out the window.

It's hard to see how the publisher is losing «real» sales on these titles, since the reader can't purchase them as ebooks, or, in the case of the out - of - print books, in any format that benefits the publisher and author at all.