Sentences with phrase «lose possession because»

Of course they do to win but they also lose possession because they don't get those calls.

Whenever we can pass it to him in the box, do it, risk losing possession because of it.

Just running and ignoring his team mates, runs into a dead ends ending up losing possession because the chance is gone.

If you lost your possessions because of a break - in or a fire, your insurance will allow you to recover their value.

Not exact matches

College students usually have little money saved in the event of an emergency, so losing their possessions in, for example, a fire would be especially devastating because they might not be able to replace their belongings.

Job lost all his possessions (health, family, other property), but it was all OK in the end, because he got his health back, and a fresh set of livestock and children.

Instead he plays Ramsay on the right and kept playing little passes all game long (75 % possession) i mean that is laughable because he came to this game not to lose, he did not come to win this game in the fear that he might lose it.

We controlled the possession, we created plenty of chances and we lost because we gave them two half opportunities and our «BRILLIANT» new keeper flopped harder then Hazard when he sees contact coming in the box.

I'm undecided on Xhaka because everything went through him, but his long passing radar was a bit off and he made two big mistakes for the goal, losing possession and then chasing the ball instead of getting back into position.

or how to attack without losing your shape should you turn the ball over Wenger teams have always been vulnerable to counter attacks they just won a lot because the attackers were SO good they dd not concede enough possession for many teams to get the chance to counter.

Also barcelona's style of play is built around possession with pass and movement, barca players do nt really take more than one touch before moving into a different position to receive the ball or draw the man and because they press intently after losing the ball it is not as vital that all players are correctly positioned.

Both Ozil and Welbeck played well in this match but Sanchez was very poor; the reason he was left on because he can still come up with that one moment and that's what we needed even if it was at the expense of him losing possession a couple of times.

Wenger is no tactical genius but we lost because Ramsey was very poor in possession, Cazorla wasn't really in the game, Welbeck didn't help Bellerin out enough (or effectively enough) and Bellerin was overrun by Rose.

When on the pitch, we knew he will make a difference... The defense feels secure, the attack as well feels free, and he actuallt start those attack... Xakha doesn't he just pass and run to get a pass, not going forward or making that pass that ma kes a difference or a goal... Useless, but great stats, like our 70 % possession and losing games, he is the leader of that no sense possession, passing, he does most of our passes, then runs to get it back to pass it, gets it back because he just passes and player is stock has to get it back to him... He will be a great journalist pulling stats..

The main reason he gets a lower rating is because he lost possession some times in midfield and could have paid for it had City had more players on the break.

Even a lost possession allows the attack more room because the defenders will be on the back foot next time which creates space.

This leads to many mispasses and Arsenal lost many better chances because they always rush when in possession.

Here's the TD that was called back, because RG3 lost possession and didn't regain it before crossing the goal line.

33 attempts at goal 75 % possession and lose comfortably it can only happen to arsenal it would be funny if not so tragic and I'm for one not buying the reason we lost is because of De Gea it's as much poor finishing as it is great goal keeping more aggression with the chances and you score I don't care who's in goal just smash it doesn't have to look pretty and I don't have to say very much about the defending it's schoolboy stuff all this talk about koscielny (bosscielny) never got that isn't physical enough to be an Adams or Campbell gets muscled off the ball far too often he's a good player don't get me wrong but he ain't world class and definitely isn't a leader I'd replace that whole back line and drop xhaka and ramsey for new signings yeah ramsey set up a nice goal but that kid can not hit water if he fell out of a boat his shooting is awful always sky's them very frustrating player.

We didn't win the ball back in the midfield and we lost it too many times there because of misplaced passes and we were too cautious going forward and sat back and rely only on counter-attacks which ended with losing possession.

Well i also love sanchez and i'm not sure but i think that you meant losing possession and not position, because one cant really fault giroud for 3 in 4 losing positions..

They are easily run over and they are bound to easily lose possession on the wings because they hold on to the ball and pass round excessively, without much directness.

If you say that you lose possession then what that is also illogical because your premise is that the additional midfielder can do enough to justify not having the additional defender — which no midfielder, including Ozil, can justify given this season's performances.

Song for me was brilliant yesterday, when all around him were panicking and losing possession he stayed focused on his own game, at one stage making a great forward run and cleverly winning a corner off the defender, thats what we need, when the chips are down a guy who WANTS to make something happen and shows the drive and initiative to succeed because we were heading toward another inept performance at home when we needed to show up and win... Im really liking what Im seeing from him this season, hes a leader.....

In a robust exchange with former deputy prime minister Nick Clegg, the ex-Ukip leader also suggested Britain had lost the second world war because the nation had been «bankrupted» and «our big imperial possessions started to disappear.»

Also I don't lose my entire collection if someone were to steal one of my books, nor can someone remove it from my possession without my permission just because they lose the rights to the material.

College students usually have little money saved in the event of an emergency, so losing their possessions in, for example, a fire would be especially devastating because they might not be able to replace their belongings.

A solider serving out of the country may not be able to attend or have competent representation at an arbitrary hearing and because of that, lose possession of a car or other asset.

This isn't abused however because if you die again before you get your possessions back you lose them for good.

Providing this is done, the landlord loses little by granting fixed - term assured shorthold tenancies in preference to periodic assured tenancies, because to all intents and purposes the same grounds for possession will be available before the fixed - term expires.

As a matter of fact, it's when a person loses their possessions that they find they are everything because their hard earned money goes into buying their material possessions.

Most people of every age would have trouble replacing their possessions if they were lost, but seniors are particularly vulnerable to loss, because they have accumulated so much over time and because they are generally living on a pension or other fixed income and monthly expenses are already difficult enough to meet as it is.

But without Gadsden Renters Insurance you will not be able to enjoy life to its fullest because of the worry that a fire, natural disaster, or theft might cause you to lose your possessions.

Though you will not have to pay for the repairs yourself because it is the building that is damaged, you did lose almost all of the possessions that you own in the world.