Sentences with phrase «losing his seat next»

And assuming Republicans lose seats next year — with swing - district moderates the first to fall — the conservatives will have even more leverage over GOP leadership in the coming Congress.

And speaking about Lord Ashcroft polling suggesting his party would lose seats next year, Mr Pickles said: «This is not a prediction, it is a snap shot.»

Not exact matches

Trump said Wednesday that it was «important» to vote on the tax bill next week, but not only because the GOP lost a seat in Alabama.

there's a whole laundry list of minor changes that could save billions but no one wants to talk about them because they will lose their seat during the next election.

The manager doesn't have faith in him, Alexis, Ozil, and God knows how many other of our top players will be leaving next summer, the manager has completely lost the plot, and the dressing room, the owner doesn't care, the fans are in turmoil, plenty of empty seats at the Emirates, no CL football, maybe no European football at all next season, we don't pay the top wages... why stay?

According to Safe Kids Worldwide, every time you move your child up to the next type of seat, you lose some protection, so be sure your child's ready for a booster seat.

If you know that your baby only has ten minutes in the bouncy seat before they lose it, grab your partner for a quick get - it - on sesh and feel excited and turned on for the next one.

If you're a safety - conquers - all kind of parent, remember this simple rule: Don't graduate your kid to the next type of safety seat until you absolutely have to, because «every time you transition, you're going to lose a little bit of protection,» Hoffman, the Oregon pediatrician and car seat specialist, says.

The likelihood is the Lib Dems will lose many seats next year.

One Labour MP said that he wanted a higher salary in case he lost his seat in the next general election.

He tells the Daily Politics that the Lib Dems are currently on course to lose between ten to twenty seats at the next general election and are likely to only get a «tiny» bounce from the conference.

Running in an off - year local race allows lawmakers to potentially receive a salary bump and still have a seat to return to next year should they lose.

The other thought is that Flanagan could face a rebellion within the conference, and if they lose that Skelos seat to Democrat Todd Kaminsky next month his days as leader could be numbered.

Some may argue that Labour can afford to lose some support in its heartlands so long as it does well where it needs to win seats at the next general election.

Both coalition parties have a clear incentive to stay in power for the full term, as it's the only hope they have of not losing seats at the next election.

They suggest that Democrats are more likely to lose Senate seats next year than to gain them — and that while there's a plausible path to a Democratic majority, it's a fairly unlikely one.

«David Cameron threw the kitchen sink at this seat and lost, but the truth is this by - election... sends pretty strong messages to the mainstream parties next May.

If the Liberal Democrats lose the seat it suggests that they will seriously struggle at the next general election (as those who don't understand the drawbacks of Universal National Swing are already fond of predicting).

The Murdoch press empire decided to rain on the Scottish Labour leadership parade on Saturday by releasing a YouGov poll in The Sun and The Times showing the party is 20 points behind the SNP in voting intentions for next Westminster's election — an outcome that could see it lose the vast bulk of its Commons seats.

«Any business that had done that would be looking very hard now at both its strategy and its management to see how we get some of that back - because otherwise we're going to lose a large number of seats at the next election.»

But in those seats where it came second in the by - election (as UKIP has done in Eastleigh), it went on to lose almost half its vote share at the next general election.

Democrats lost the county executive seat in a 2009 election that presaged big congressional and legislative losses the next year.

It was mentally insane to keep her as leader that after she lost 63 seats and even more so now as she not only had minimal gains this time but she's probably going to lose seats again next time because you won't have African American and Latino voters coming out to vote in such large numbers which was Obama true assets, racial identity politics (not criticizing it, just saying he did it well).

New York is due to lose two congressional seats next year during the coming round of redistricting.

It's clear that New York will lose two House seats in the next round of redistricting — most likely one upstate and one downstate, as is the tradition, although if the push for a nonpartisan commission is successful (seems doubtful at this point), that could change.

This likely means New York will lose at least one seat in the House of Representatives in the next round of re-apportionment, where the state currently has 27 members.

If the Liberal Democrats lost only 10 or 11 seats at the next election they'd probably be quite pleased... but remember, the Lib Dems also have around 10 English seats where Labour is the challenger and 11 seats in Scotland that could be vulnerable to either Labour or the SNP, so this is not the only battleground for them.

Given that Labour is unlikely to recover in 2020 the 59 parliamentary seats lost in Scotland in 2015, and the boundary review will probably cost Labour a further 20 seats, a new leader before 2020 seems a much worse bet than Blair in 1994 to be the next Labour prime minister.

The Scottish boundary commission don't report until next month, but for obvious reasons the Conservatives and Labour can only lose a maximum of one seat each there, meaning that on these boundaries the Conservatives would have had a majority of around 40 at the last election.

But while every new president can expect his party to lose congressional seats in the first midterm election after he takes office, Dawidziak said he doesn't expect a tsunami for Democrats, or for King or Zeldin to face «top - notch» opponents next year.

Since the man Queens party boss Congressman Joe Crowley picked for the seat, Assemblyman David Weprin, lost to Republican Bob Turner, Assemblyman Lancman has kept up a steady stream of criticism of the new congressman, potentially portending a run against him next year.

Louisiana isn't anywhere close to belonging on a list of swing states, yet Republican David Vitter is at risk of losing not only his gubernatorial race this month, but also his Senate seat next year.

If he doesn't lose that the GOP has to spend heavily to keep his seat and that his opponent bloodies him enough to make him easier next time around.

But the leading psephologist Professor John Curtice has predicted Labour could lose between 50 and 100 seats in next month's local elections.

Later on, Corbyn also hits out at the BBC for promoting the narrative that Labour needed to do better in May's local elections — when it lost fewer than 20 council seats — to show it was on track to win the next general election.

If she loses her seat at the next general election, when the constituents get the chance to send a message on whether they think she's let them down, this could be the defining final moment of her parliamentary career.

Not sure, if this is undetAnd, labour spent more than the Tories in 2005 75 % of labours spending in 1997 came from the private side, and recall 1979 when the closed shop meant everyone had to joina Union, that union had to give money to the labour party, we knew the next election would be the most vicious since 1992 ′ we win the campaign, lost the election that time, The Tory press isn't as strong as it was then, the tories haven't got lost of «extremist» stories about labour they had thrn to smear us now, They're a smaller party not just cos of Ukip, But labour has a lot of keen strong members, and it'll come doen to 70 or so marginal seats what happens, while not losing our working class votes in Newcastle, birmingham Luton Rotherham, Scotland, and if they're not abstaining, or voting Ukip, we have to ask why they're voting tory

Labour might lose their majority at the next election but it's going to be difficult for the Conservatives to gain a majority of their own unless they (we) can start winning a lot of the seats currently held by the Liberal Democrats.

Perhaps Mr Finkelstein could provide a sobering lecture at the conference fringe next week, after all, he does have personal experience of losing us a safe seat.

Any business that had done that would be looking very hard now at both its strategy and its management to see how we get some of that back because otherwise we are going to lose a large number of seats at the next election.»

This week, The fabian society released a report arguing that in the next general election it is possible that all current women Liberal Democrat MPs will lose their seats.

The next election many seat where the Tories lost to labour by 5000 votes will be the ones, that the Tories can put up, candidates who backed remain, Estelle Mcvey.

Mr Johnson admitted it would be a «a disappointment» if the Conservatives lose the seat, but insisted the party would «fight again» for the seat at next year's general election.

Buerkle is increasingly mentioned as a potential sacrificial lamb for the Republicans when it comes to eliminating one of the two House seats New York will lose in the next round of redistricting — particularly since GOP Rep. Bob Turner's surprise win in the NY - 9 special election.

«No senator wants to be the next Dede Scozzafava and lose their seat because of the issue of marriage,» McGuire said.

Losing a Democratic U.S. Senate seat from New York would be nothing short of a disaster for the Obama Administration in next fall's mid-term election.

This year, Bell, who lost his Assembly seat to a young buzz - saw named Maurice Hinchey 40 years ago next month, has been «running» as a write - in on the Libertarian ticket for Assembly against the Kevins.

In essence, as far as the Tories are going to be concerned, the Lib Dems have increased the chances of them losing their seats at the next election.

You realize, don't you, that the Republicans are actually going to LOSE seats in next year's mid-terms?

Dartford is now an ultra-marginal that could fall to the Conservatives even if Labour retain a majority, while Chorley is an increasingly safe Labour seat, so either could well lose their record next time round.