Sentences with phrase «losing that asset at»

Failure to list and exempt an asset in bankruptcy can, and usually does, result in losing that asset at a minimum and loss of your discharge and prosecution at a maximum.

Not exact matches

When the Bitcoin price peaked at $ 20,000 in December, the value of Mt. Gox's assets (by then including Bitcoin derivatives such as Bitcoin Cash) ballooned to $ 4.4 billion — nearly 10 times the amount Mt. Gox said it lost in the first place.

Japan suffered an asset price bubble at the end of the 1980s and experienced a period that is referred to as «the lost two decades».

By automating our inventory, the time we spend tracking assets has been cut in half, saving us $ 50,000 a year and at least $ 3,000 a month in lost revenue.

At close to half a billion dollars, it was well beyond the outer limits of what investors had ever paid for a publishing company of Wired's size — never mind one whose operations were on track to lose $ 11 million that year (not even counting a onetime $ 20.5 - million write - off to put the company's disparate assets under one corporate umbrella).

However, the overwhelming growth in exotic ETFs means investors risk losing themselves in arcane ETF details at the expense of ignoring the big asset allocation decision.

Toronto - Dominion Bank sees as many as 90,000 jobs lost by the end of the decade from the move and Eric Lascelles, chief economist at RBC Global Asset Management, says higher minimum wages across Canada could boost consumer prices by 0.5 percent over two years.

At the very least, you should check your asset allocation once a year or any time your financial circumstances change significantly — for instance, if you lose your job or get a big bonus.

The results add weight to warnings from analysts that fossil fuel assets are at risk of losing their value and becoming «stranded» as the world transitions to cleaner energy sources.

Many factors could cause BlackBerry's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward - looking statements, including, without limitation: BlackBerry's ability to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services in a timely manner or at competitive prices, including risks related to new product introductions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to mitigate the impact of the anticipated decline in BlackBerry's infrastructure access fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering; intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within BlackBerry's industry; BlackBerry's reliance on carrier partners and distributors; risks associated with BlackBerry's foreign operations, including risks related to recent political and economic developments in Venezuela and the impact of foreign currency restrictions; risks relating to network disruptions and other business interruptions, including costs, potential liabilities, lost revenues and reputational damage associated with service interruptions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to implement and to realize the anticipated benefits of its CORE program; BlackBerry's ability to maintain or increase its cash balance; security risks; BlackBerry's ability to attract and retain key personnel; risks related to intellectual property rights; BlackBerry's ability to expand and manage BlackBerry ® World ™; risks related to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of confidential and personal information; BlackBerry's ability to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers of functional components for its products and risks relating to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties; BlackBerry's ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related to government regulations, including regulations relating to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability to continue to adapt to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third - party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third - party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities in BlackBerry's products; risks related to litigation, including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks as a result of actions of activist shareholders; government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry.

Many seem to be waiting for «the big kill,» the sucker who proverbally is born every minute, but whom a Russian only needs to meet once in a lifetime to dump his assets at an inflated price (something like the Rockefellers finally being able to dump their money - losing Rockefeller Center on the Japanese when the once - in - a-lifetime spike of New York real - estate prices occurred in 1988).

Putting up the business or personal assets as collateral can put you at risk of losing them in case you default.

If disaster strikes at your company, your assets may be insured, but what about all that lost business?

In their July 2017 paper entitled «Breadth Momentum and Vigilant Asset Allocation (VAA): Winning More by Losing Less», Wouter Keller and Jan Keuning introduce VAA as a dual momentum asset class strategy aiming at returns above 10 % with drawdowns less than -20 % Asset Allocation (VAA): Winning More by Losing Less», Wouter Keller and Jan Keuning introduce VAA as a dual momentum asset class strategy aiming at returns above 10 % with drawdowns less than -20 % asset class strategy aiming at returns above 10 % with drawdowns less than -20 % deep.

With Raheem Sterling refusing to sign a new contract at Anfield, Liverpool could lose their prized asset to Manchester City, Real Madrid or Bayern Munich in what would be another major blow after Luis Suarez left for Barcelona last year.

Arsenal might have to resign themselves to losing Sanchez but they should make tremendous overtures to keep Chamberlain at the club for as longs as they can and as long as he continues to be a real, valuable asset

Shame I hear AW is geting divorced which means his still losing his best assets, I'm wondering if he will transfer a younger faster filter model for his late nights at Arsenal treasury counting the clubs money

this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger is not keen on losing his prized asset who is valued at around # 35m but with the circumstances, it would be smart if Wenger allows Ox to move on.

«I think that failure of vision puts them at a real risk of having stranded assets, of losing market share [to alternative energy sources] and even of becoming irrelevant.»

million year over year, or losing wealth at rate of about 6.5 percent for 10 years straight, is poor asset management.

Will intellectual property rights lose relevance altogether or will they become business's only valuable assets — for instance, selling the right to print products at home?

He has a son at home who's about to head to college and back in the 2007 - 2008 financial crisis, he and his wife nearly lost all their assets; so $ 100,000 dollars seems very tempting.

You may also lose a sense of visibility if your investments are in multiple places that you can't get back unless you do a little work to look at your overall holdings and asset allocation across all accounts.

And the only losing asset class in 2013 was Canadian bonds, at minus 1.19 %.

Actually, I'd been doing the same thing for quite some time and only after years of study, experience and losing money did I realize that I should really take a closer look at diversified asset allocation.

At the very least, you should check your asset allocation once a year or any time your financial circumstances change significantly — for instance, if you lose your job or get a big bonus.

Certainly at the start, when making the decision where to hold your assets, you never expect to lose money, or you would not invest in the first place.

Winning means keeping your clients happy by realizing low risk and great returns, slowly growing assets under management, while at the same time, not wasting / losing time and money trying to manage money.

What asset is easy to liquefy (even in case of severe local crisis) but immune to local hyperinflation and strong against global crises, plus doesn't lose value over time, or at least loses it slower than cash?

Instead of the maximization of shareholder value (the number one goal of a corporation according to Aswath Damodaron) we witnessed a good ol' boy board of directors sit back and allow an entrenched management team to either lose or steal millions of assets (at one million a year in salary on a 10MM company, its stealing or akin to stealing no matter what actually happened to the $ 8 per share of liquidation value you mentioned that the company had... just one year ago)... and it raises goosebumps wondering where the millions of dollars actually went... just as I am sure Bernie Madoff's investors are wondering where there money is...

Your home and your assets are not at stake, meaning you can pay off your debt without that constant fear of losing everything hanging over you.

However, in some difficult economic periods, such as the recession that began in 2007, all asset classes can lose value at the same time.

In certain cases, you could lose not only your investment property but your other assets may be at risk as well.

There are some worried folks over at the Bogleheads forum who fear that, if only one firm holds all of an investor's assets, and they go belly up, they would lose most if not all their life savings, a la Bernie Madoff.

Asset classes such as value stocks and real estate investment trusts were largely ignored by the financial press at the time, despite their historically low valuations, and many mutual funds in those categories lost assets.

In bankruptcy circles, a secondary lien becomes wholly unsecured when the secured asset loses its market value to at or below the primary loan value.

A solider serving out of the country may not be able to attend or have competent representation at an arbitrary hearing and because of that, lose possession of a car or other asset.

The analyst will avoid issues which have been losing their quick assets at a rapid rate and show no definite signs of ceasing to do so.»

Trouble is, if you fail to execute this strategy at just the right time, or if you buy bonds just when the bond market is retreating, you could easily end on the losing side of both asset classes, selling at a market low and buying back in at a market high.

Car and student loans are an essentially different financial proposition, because you know from the start that the asset will not retain its value (unless you are «investing in a vintage car» rather than «buying a means of personal transportation», a new car will lose most of its monetary value within say 5 years) or there is no tangible asset at all (e.g. taking out a student loan, paying for a vacation trip by credit card, etc).

At some point after 10 - 15 of investing in stocks only, I do plan to transfer a percentage of the portfolio to less risky assets of fixed income to reduce the risk of losing money due to stock market fluctuations when approaching her start date.

If you put up an asset as collateral, such as a car or house, you are at risk of losing that asset should you find yourself unable to make the consolidation loan payments.

Look at all the variables you used when you bought the stock — discounted cash flow, price - to - earnings, price - to - cash - flow, net asset value, price - to - book — and use that information to decide what the upside is if the stock rises and what you stand to lose if it drops.

The blessing of our industry's market - timing scandal — the good for our investors blown by that ill wind — is that it has focused the spotlight on that conflict, and on its even more scandalous manifestations: the level of fund costs, the building of assets of individual funds to levels at which they can no longer differentiate themselves, and the focus on selling funds that make money for managers while far too often losing money — and lots of it — for investors.

There's also a chance you'll lose some of your assets, but at least once you've made your final payment, all your eligible unsecured debts will be discharged and you can start fresh.

But interestingly enough, Kolimago doesn't worry at all about losing business to the other robo - advisers that are catering to investors with fewer assets by waiving fees or offering low minimum accounts.

Losing money in your portfolio at the same time you lose your job is even worse, and that correlation is what makes «risk assets» risky.

[2][3] In fiscal year 2009 ending in June, Cooper Union's managed assets (including investments in hedge funds) lost 14 %, and the value of its endowment in 2013 was lower than it was at the end of fiscal year 2008, even as the Standard & Poor's 500 - stock index hit new highs.

Oil Investors at Brink of Losing Trillions of Dollars in Assets.