Dear, This is very good information, However what is the major difference with the trailing stop loss or is there option of including a trailing
stop loss function?
In theory, accurate calculation of IMFP in a material is feasible provided that the energy
loss function of that material is fully known.
To overcome this problem, we described the optical energy
loss function in terms of a composite function resulting from combining many functions, and also used a new model function that accurately expresses the change in momentum.
The energy
loss function represents the level of interaction between the material and electromagnetic waves, and is expressed in terms of the change in the amount of energy lost from electrons and the change in momentum due to corresponding scattering events occurring in the material.
In particular,
the loss functions of the DICE model and the FUND model are arbitrarily chosen, and we have yet to see sufficient justification for these functions themselves.
Other potential changes, such as altering the end year to something less than the model's unrealistically distant projections of economic damages (which extend nearly 300 years into the future) as well as alterations to the model's
loss function, have the potential to change the model's results drastically.
From overseeing profit and
loss functions and directing payroll systems to spearheading staff development and implementing policies and processes designed to optimize efficiency and productivity, I excel at managing projects, collaborating with cross-functional teams, and exceeding corporate goals and objectives.
Through my experience, I have become adept at leading all aspects of risk management and streamlining operational processes, as well as driving warehousing, sales, and profit and
loss functions.
Successfully overseeing profit and
loss functions, marketing activities, budget forecasts, daily operations, trend analysis, and sales negotiations for industry - leading hotels and resorts.