Sentences with phrase «lost facts in the case»

Move and NAR are asking Judge Sean O'Donnell to enter a default judgment against Zillow, arguing a fair trial is harder to get because there are too many lost facts in the case.

Not exact matches

But somewhat lost in all of this business wheeling and dealing is the fact that the balance of power in medicine is shifting: Armed with their body's own endless stream of signals and a smartphone, many individuals are getting the information they need to take charge of their health and wellbeing — or, in the case of Theresa Beech, whose 13 - year - old son was lost to cancer two years ago, to help total strangers search for a long - elusive cure.
Despite the fact that at least five of the judges involved in the two appeal court judgements were originally appointed to lower courts by Brian Mulroney's Conservative government, Harper insisted: «It was the government that decided to put the judges on the bench, the government that decided not to appeal, the government that decided to lose the case and the government that decided not to come back to Parliament.
The fact that the US may lose comparative ground against China only makes the case more compelling in the long term.
But in our haste to use links as a means to an end, we can lose sight of the fact that the act of building links in many cases can carry benefits that have absolutely nothing to do with the Google - naut or any other search monster.
But for anyone interested in the facts of the case, the secularist narrative has lost its poster - boy.
In the present case, it is important that we do not lose sight of the fact that, in reality, there is no such thing as an electrical field that is separable from current sources, a medium, chemical gradients, heat, gravity, and so on ad infinituIn the present case, it is important that we do not lose sight of the fact that, in reality, there is no such thing as an electrical field that is separable from current sources, a medium, chemical gradients, heat, gravity, and so on ad infinituin reality, there is no such thing as an electrical field that is separable from current sources, a medium, chemical gradients, heat, gravity, and so on ad infinitum.
This fact will probably be lost on the preachers, however, because in most cases they also will have come from a dysfunctional family — one in which expression of emotions is discouraged or repressed, usually through compulsive substance abuse.
One, like the other, is obliged not to lose touch with the given facts; they follow empirical methods; their goal is to understand «situations» — personal situations in the case of the psychologist, historical situations in the case of the historian of religions.
Smart people also know that the fact that we lost against chelsea in both cases had nothing to do with Wenger's football wisdom.
Yet while the manager must take most of the blame the players themselves must be held accountable in the case of several matches that we have drawn or lost due to the fact that they were in GLORY MODE, all going forward to get a goal, i will have to ask then where is our team leaders, they were caught in the glory mode too.
much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..
In fact I don't think we would have lost if this was the case, as we were looking quite decent until the Costa incident.
But in any case a woman is not going to say, «go away kid I'm not interested in the fact that you're lost and you need help.»
Haters of truth and sentimentalists will call for Oshekomes head, byt will foolishly turn blind eyes to the fact that he have outlaid a child who depends on the father or relative being the invigilator to pass exams will always fail the exam on the day his father or relation is not in the exams hall, that is the case of the EFCC and the FGN, they relied on the judiciary to help them rubbish their opposition or faces they do not like, and have always lost cases because their candidates in the judiciary were not assigned their cases and that is the same head of EFCC Magu that the president keep nominating for confirmation, even when reports indicted him, this recent looses have to confirm to doubting Thomas that Magu is just the best because he can do the dirty work for the APC and Buhari, not because he is the best in corruption fight, I wish there is a listening and discerning government in place back there in Nigeria, they would have known that there is a vacuum as far as EFCC is concerned and use the time to shop for a head that will deliver, it also confirms the fact that the «So called fight against corruption» Is a BIG lie and propaganda, just a wipe to flog opposition into their line, shame on the clapping members and the O yes members who will never hear any criticisms concerning Buhari or anything he does good or bad, bitter or sweet dem go swallow like that shaaaaa.
Justice Benin in his concurring judgment was more explicit about the fact that the plaintiffs had lost their case.
So the Lib Dems might, in fact, lose most if the Woolas case significantly makes parties clean up their acts.
In a case in which no witness testified directly to knowledge of an illegal quid pro quo, how Judge Valerie E. Caproni tells jurors to interpret the evidence as it relates to the law could sway deliberations — a fact certainly not lost on the government or the defensIn a case in which no witness testified directly to knowledge of an illegal quid pro quo, how Judge Valerie E. Caproni tells jurors to interpret the evidence as it relates to the law could sway deliberations — a fact certainly not lost on the government or the defensin which no witness testified directly to knowledge of an illegal quid pro quo, how Judge Valerie E. Caproni tells jurors to interpret the evidence as it relates to the law could sway deliberations — a fact certainly not lost on the government or the defense.
Its a fact in case you didn't realize by now that eating small frequent meals, preferably 5 - 6 times a day is the best way to lose fat permanently.
The fact that this in not the case is why this quality is required not just in weight lose but in anything in life were progress is not easy, consistent or straightforward.
The film struggles to create a context in which the climactic murder seems inevitable, but the facts don't support a psychological case study — all indications are that du Pont more or less lost his mind in the weeks leading up to the murder, whereas most of Foxcatcher takes place almost a decade earlier — and screenwriters Dan Futterman (who also wrote Capote) and E. Max Frye (Something Wild — this is not) never manage to build a series of petty rivalries and resentments into tragedy.
One of the great beauties of director Sean Baker's (Tangerine) film is that he never loses sight of two things about these kids (and particularly Moonee): 1) they're not being raised right, between the poverty and the fact that, in Moonee's case, her mom encourages her worst impulses and is a terrible example, and 2) they're still just kids.
In some cases, lost records are also a result of bad luck and the fact that the preservation of lottery data is not a priority after the school admissions process is complete.
** I don't want to minimize the fact that in some cases, authors and publishers do lose money from piracy.
In fact, a company can have negative net income, losing money, every quarter and still be considered a growth stock as in the case of AmazoIn fact, a company can have negative net income, losing money, every quarter and still be considered a growth stock as in the case of Amazoin the case of Amazon.
Following some lengthy analysis of the facts and the previous decisions in the case, the district court «concludes that defendants are liable for breaching their fiduciary obligations and are liable beginning on August 16, 2001 — or for three funds the later date institutional share classes become available — for the actual loss in excessive fees paid and for the lost investment opportunity of this breach.»
In fact, the only risk I see is that something absolutely terrible happens (in which case my 6 months» emergency fund probably isn't sufficient anyway) or my credit limits are suddenly taken away from me the day that I lose my joIn fact, the only risk I see is that something absolutely terrible happens (in which case my 6 months» emergency fund probably isn't sufficient anyway) or my credit limits are suddenly taken away from me the day that I lose my join which case my 6 months» emergency fund probably isn't sufficient anyway) or my credit limits are suddenly taken away from me the day that I lose my job.
Not everyone loses their home or car, in fact in most cases they do not.
Well, thankfully, credit card rewards aren't a use - it - or - lose - it commodity; in fact, most credit card rewards won't expire at all, so long as your account remains open and in good standing (but check with your issuer just in case).
We pride ourselves in the fact that we have never lost a key before, but we all know that accidents happen and would like to prepare for the worst case scenario.
In fact, I barely pay attention to directions, train stops and street names when I'm on a tour, so I figured I'd be constantly lost during my free time in Dusseldorf — which surprisingly wasn't the casIn fact, I barely pay attention to directions, train stops and street names when I'm on a tour, so I figured I'd be constantly lost during my free time in Dusseldorf — which surprisingly wasn't the casin Dusseldorf — which surprisingly wasn't the case.
Well, thankfully, credit card rewards aren't a use - it - or - lose - it commodity; in fact, most credit card rewards won't expire at all, so long as your account remains open and in good standing (but check with your issuer just in case).
In fact, you will look at losing 2 - 3 times more money when buying crates with keys, even in the case of the Desperado crate, which only costs $ 0.04 on the Steam markeIn fact, you will look at losing 2 - 3 times more money when buying crates with keys, even in the case of the Desperado crate, which only costs $ 0.04 on the Steam markein the case of the Desperado crate, which only costs $ 0.04 on the Steam market.
5 Most men, despite lip - service to equality, are reluctant to give up this «natural» order of things in which their advantages are so great; for women, the case is further complicated by the fact that, as Mill astutely pointed out, unlike other oppressed groups or castes, men demand of her not only submission but unqualified affection as well; thus women are often weakened by the internalized demands of the male - dominated society itself, as well as by a plethora of material goods and comforts: the middle - class woman has a great deal more to lose than her chains.
Despite the fact that the world is fascinated by his production processes, Andreas Gursky prefers not to talk about how his artworks are made in case they «lose a bit their secret and mystery».
The next stages are easy to predict as well — the issues of «process» will be lost in the noise, the fake overreaction will dominate the wider conversation and become an alternative fact to be regurgitated in twitter threads and blog comments for years, the originators of the issue may or may not walk back the many mis - statements they and others made but will lose credibility in any case, mainstream scientists will just see it as hyper - partisan noise and ignore it, no papers will be redacted, no science will change, and the actual point (one presumes) of the «process» complaint (to encourage better archiving practices) gets set back because it's associated with such obvious nonsense.
This is usually how it goes: politician wannabe gets campaign contributions from private sector guy, gets into office, legislates in favor of private sector guy, private sector guy contributes more, politician guy takes vacation in Italy (or goes for a hike on the Appalachian trail)... gets re-elected, the word gets out that he «plays,» more private sector guys contribute to his campaign, voters are pleased to see the name of their representative in print, like the new wardrobe, the new hairstyle, believe all change is good and re-elect the politician again... politician feels the power, creates agency to watch over private sector guy, agency takes fact - finding trip to France... raises taxes on private sector guy, writes legislation that taxes private sector guy if his plant emits CO2 while producing widgets... voters are in awe and re-elect the politician... private sector guy whines, politician makes him ambassador to Taiwan, limits how much the new private guy taking his place can earn, and taxes all widgets so new private guy will make more environmentally friendly ones... voters swoon, pay more for widgets, lose job in widget factory, hate private guy, re-elect their pol... politician buries $ 5 billion aid to Taiwan in next appropriation bill...... kind of makes a case for term limits, doesn't it.
John Oliver has an interesting story about how Philip Morris threatened to sue Togo by appealing to a case against the Australian government they in fact lost:
In fact, Spence has never lost a criminal case and never lost a civil case since 1969.
Low - income families must fight these battles on their own because — despite the fact that civil cases can result in people going to jail, or losing their home, health care, custody of their children or sense of safety — there is no right to an attorney in civil legal proceedings as there is for criminal defendants.
If you take it upon yourself to represent your own case then you are likely to not receive the maximum amount of benefits that you qualify for, in fact, you may not even get compensated at all if you lose your case.
«While this court must take and does take the issue of abuse of a child very seriously,» the footnote said, «the fact that a trial judge tells parents that unless one of them «cops to an admission of what happened to the child» they are going to lose their child, flies in the face of not only the CPSL, but of the entire body of case law with regard to best interests of the child and family reunification.
If you have lost a family member in an accident, you need to speak with an attorney who can compassionately and objectively evaluate the facts of your case and help you decide whether to file a wrongful death claim.
In fact, many legal teams find themselves losing cases because they have had to rely on court reporters who are not up to the job.
Attorneys usually state that the adverse cases are «distinguishable» and then list the facts and holding of each case without explaining why the cases are distinguishable, losing the judge in the details.
Before I turn to the questions I want to say something about the basic facts of the case which have become entirely lost in the furore about «gags», superinjunctions and parliamentary privilege.
If cynics like to point to the fact that those in the legal community might simply be afraid to lose their monopoly on brokering settlements and, therefore, their jobs, we believe that this isn't the case, but rather that their reservations are linked to an unfounded fear that ODR might contribute to the erosion of the rule of law.
In terms of sheer scale the biggest player in this group continues to be Latham, despite the fact that it lost its crown as the UK's largest US firm two years ago to rival White & CasIn terms of sheer scale the biggest player in this group continues to be Latham, despite the fact that it lost its crown as the UK's largest US firm two years ago to rival White & Casin this group continues to be Latham, despite the fact that it lost its crown as the UK's largest US firm two years ago to rival White & Case.
Sadly, it is not uncommon for self - represented parties to lose a case merely because they did not understand the law or failed to present a coherent legal argument despite having very compelling facts in their favour.
On that issue, Nordheimer found «the concern over the submission about the chill on zealous advocacy loses much of its impact if the reality is that this zealous advocacy is being used to further arguments in cases where the facts would not, on an objectively reasonable basis, warrant the ultimate relief sought.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z