Sentences with phrase «lost less games»

Yes there have been some crazy defeats along the way, but the fact is that Wenger has lost less games than any other manager in Europe this year, so who could possibly come in and improve on that record?

Only ONE team lost less games than us last season, and we beat them twice!

After all only two teams have lost less games than us at this point of time, and they are Spuds and Leicester.....

They are the team that have lost less games than any other team so the Premier League rewards the consistency and on that front, they have been defensively very strong and very consistent.»

Arsenal also lose less games when Ozil plays.

Not exact matches

«There are fans who could care less whether we win or lose or even know what the score is at the end of the game,» says Fanning.

Once you are burning body fat for energy, you will lose weight, have more energy and feel less hungry — it's a game changer!

I lost one of my best friends to suicide less than two years ago and through a Professor my friend and I had at different times, another student game me a copy of the writing by Norman Vincent Peale.

As you are well aware of by now, Michigan lost to Kentucky on a ridiculous three - pointer made by Aaron Harrison with less than three seconds left in the game.

I'm pretty sure YES noted they have lost tons (25 games or something) by 5 points or less.

for more reason then one i think we probably lose this one it might help with the rest of the season less games = less injuries, and also i think some people are forgetting that Southampton are second in the league they wont be a push over and they will go with full squad to our youth.

The Middies not only lost two of those games but managed to blow two others against lesser opponents, including their season opener to an unheralded small - college team, the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.

Now, instead, you have people like me wondering if their September will end up more or less pathetic than that of say, the 2011 Red Sox, who went 7 - 20 in the season's final month and blew a nine - game lead over the Rays to lose the AL East and a wild card spot in the process.

Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting

You can lose to a team in a game but beat them in the table because they drop points against lesser teams.

We win huge upside we lose respectable say less than 7 - 9 points make it a game we gain cred.

In 2012 the Tigers lost three of their first four games by a touchdown or less, which «caused us to expect to lose whenever it was close,» says Ford.

In this exchange, the Patriots got one year of a game - breaking deep threat — in a season where leading WR Julian Edelman was lost to a torn ACL, no less — AND what Jimmy Johnson's draft pick trade chart lays out as the equivalent of an extra early fourth - round, all for the burden of rostering Cooks for a season.

The Grizzlies have two routes to explore now that Evans is on the roster past the trade deadline: They can try to convince him to re-sign for the $ 8.4 million mid-level exception or less with a team that has won just a third of its possible games to date, or they can buy him out and lose him for nothing.

The Rams lost three games by a touchdown or less, plus they had their tie at San Francisco.

the problem is the complacency that has gotten hold of Wenger's brain due to lack of pressure from the top has infected the whole club... Wenger knows his job is as safe and forth knoxx so LOSING IS AN OPTION in the scheme of things, there is always another game to make things right, always another season to try again and this, whether consciously or otherwise is a malaise that has infected the player» a pysche... I have said this so many times, Fergie won the league with a squad that less than half the quality our present squad possess and in a tougher more competitive seaaon

Arsenal may have shot themselves in the foot once again where the title race is concerned, going down to ten men against Chelsea after less than 20 minutes, and consequently losing the game 1 - 0 and dropping to third place in the Premier League.

To the doomsday predictors... Don't act like that result was anything less than what you were hoping for... Certain names only appear when we lose, to flog a player who has a bad game only to disappear when he plays well for the next 10!

How often in the last 10 - 12 years did we manage to lose less than 5 games?

We scored only 2 goals less than Chelsea, yet lost 4 more games.

I could equally have said Madrid lost to team X that cost less than them, in game Y in competition Z. No two games or series are comparable.

If u lose a game say little, if u win a game say even less.

These guys didn't lose 33 of 49 games because of injuries or because they had less talent that 2/3 of their opponents.

Arsenal were playing poorly for most of this season and the five or six games we played like champions were mostly against lesser teams, yet the wisdom was that we were drawing games we used to lose, that we have more depth in the squad than ever etc..

Did we lose the title race to Leicester because we were the inferior team or was it because we were more handicapped in the race by: long term injuries, mental and physical fatigue, had to play more games, got no rest or respite, and received less favours from the refs?

since the other finalists will be either Chelsea or the Spuds and they both look certain to qualify for the UCL and I can't see how playing less games will enhance our chances of winning the league, when Wenger has already used the lack of games excuse for losing against a??

So on average we have lost one more PL game a season than Chelsea and less than one more game than Man Utd.

We go into games expecting to lose and we more or less always do.

However, six out of ten spread bets are going with St. Louis to either win straight up or lose by less than two, especially after the listless Browns have failed to score more than 12 points in each of their last three games.

If i had to pick a manager it would be Simeone, although style is different, but each match is treated no less by his players, therefore to motivate his players to give the most of themselves for every game even if he loses i think this is one of the most important qualities of a manager

Walcot has over 100 goals for arsenal fc, i don't think there is any English wiger currently playing top flight football that has scored more goals, the change in formation might not have done him any good, buh for d fact that dude is our 2nd top scorer despite playing fewer games and considering that dude was our 2nd top scorer last season shows his importance to this club, since it's obvious he has lost d love of d fans who prefers a flamboyant buh less effective player I think he should go to where he will be more valued, i love theo, very cool headed and very hardworking, his records r there for all to c

Not much less though, especially after losing the two opening games in the Champions League saw Arsenal fans vent their fury at Arsene Wenger once more.

Stabilizing the program doesn't count for much when you constantly blow winnable games, whether that means giving up leads, failing to capitalize, or losing to teams with less raw talent.

I hope liverpool who will have less rest and play two conscecutive away games rip this team to shreds so that the harsh reality can creep into the deluded ones amd silent stan starts losing money

Short of a grumpy social media sphere wanting a close game, it lost nothing by Seattle's Cover 3 turning into a two - high safety lead pipe upside Peyton Manning in what was less than engaging football for hundreds of millions of casual viewers.

Only +3 goal difference separates the two clubs in the league, Burnley have lost two less games than us, and perform better against the top sides.

Campbell am afraid to say we lose balance and cohesion, the ball gets recycled less thus making in game confidence harder to build upon.

good game...... metersacker is a worry to me, too many back passes and most too slow and too short, inevitably giving less room for ooooooospina to clear well and earning us lost possessions!

for me I woukd have told Sanchez and Ox they were not playing u less they signed a new contract or window was closed... he chose to show them he wanta them but they both used it for their own purposes... As a result the whole pre season was lost as Wenger has played Lacazette and Kolasinac and what must they have thought not to be picked in such a big game... Wenger should then and always only pick players ready to work hard for the team... yesterday also showed we do nt need Ozil to play all the time... if he had come on 2nd half yesterday along with Sanchez the Chelsea players would be thinking WTF at our bench quality

Arsenal were already up against it this weekend, as the fifth round of games in the Premier League season sees the Gunners travel to Stamford Bridge to take on the reigning EPL champions less than three days after facing the Ge4rman club FC Cologne in a Europa League clash, so the last thing Arsene Wenger needed was to lose one of his key players.

The lower we finish this season, the less the club is worth to Kroenke, so though it seems unthinkable, I now hope to lose games and lose our best players without replacing them.

Yes, losing the top guys would impact the college game, and maybe coaches would make less, and the hype would be less, but the incentives to cheat would be less, too.

Pretty damn good teams lose OOC game by less than a touchdown.

To put it in context; Leicester lost less than 10 % of their 32 games and would need to lose 50 % of their remaining 6 games for us to have a chance.

The Trail Blazers lost the first two games of their first - round series to a supposed lesser opponent on their own home floor.