What began as a small, focused Enbridge campaign with northern First Nations grew into a political juggernaut that arguably contributed to the Harper government's 2015 defeat, after the pro-tanker Conservative party
lost more votes in B.C. than in the rest of the country combined.
But I would have to tell my candidate to stay at arm's length because if you, in fact, give reasonable responses to the questions you are likely to have posed, you will
lose more votes than you will gain.
Not exact matches
Late last week, nearing the Friday 10 a.m. shareholder
vote that was supposed to determine Dell's future — a
vote Michael Dell was widely predicted to
lose — the founder swooped in with minutes to go and put a new,
more lucrative offer on the table.
Obama
lost big with such rural white voters, but won
more votes from woman, minorities and others groups clustered in or near cities.
Perhaps
more than any other
voting group in America, black Americans know there is a great deal to
lose.
Since it launched the original offer, Gannett's stock price (GCI) has
lost more than 50 % of its value, as investors
voted with their feet on the chain's proposed merger.
(CP Rail
lost its
vote over a $ 19.9 - million pay package for CEO Hunter Harrison, which ISS claimed was 2.8 times
more than his peers while CP's share price and overall performance were lacklustre.)
If the GOP would quit trying to take away women's rights (as confirmed by the Supreme Court) and concentrate on FREEDOM for all, the party would gain
more votes from women than they would
lose from evangelicals who must have other concerns that are just as important as taking away a woman's right to chose.
What the Democrats would
lose is a
vote in Congress, nothing
more
Probably a slightly
more likely scenario with a political campus group than a religious one (as we can see by Democrats who
voted for Santorum in open primary states, because they thought he would be
more likely to
lose to Obama), but who knows?
The ELCA, meanwhile, has suffered a dramatic drop in membership,
losing more than a million members since its 2009
vote to approve same - sex marriage and ordain pastors in same - sex relationships.
Last September, NFL owners came within one
vote of killing the six - team Europe league, which has
lost more than $ 20 million a year.
On the contrary, if «your» candidate is
losing in the polls you may consider your
vote more important to omit and can even flirt with
voting for someone despite not supporting him / her completely (let's call it a protest
vote, see French presidential election in 2002, with a lot of people
voting for small groups on the 1st round).
Republicans would need a 32nd
vote to elect a majority leader should Amedore
lose, making the IDC's position all the
more important.
The prize for the most cash spent per
vote goes to
losing state Senate challenger Isaac Sasson — one of two candidates who unsuccessfully challenged incumbent Queens Democratic Sen. Toby Stavisky, each dropping
more than $ 100,000 of his own money on the race.
The centre - right parties
lost more than half of their
votes (about nine millions), even though Berlusconi managed a spectacular comeback by leading an unapologetic campaign.
And now brown and Mandy run back to new labour to try and get the middle class to
vote for it, new labour is nothing
more then a Thatcherite party, and she
lost and a Pray New labour is kicked out of power even if it means it never agains takes power
Second, the electoral college was set up to weed out «unacceptable» candidates not by dividing fringe voters in different states per se but by giving the electors the power to elect the candidate who
lost the popular
vote in the event that the
more popular candidate turned out to be unacceptable for whatever reason.
However, for every
vote he has gained in the suburbs, the Tory mayoral candidate appears to have
lost more in Inner London.
Even if all of the Republicans eligible to
vote had backed Kellie Greene she still would have
lost by
more than 5000
votes.
As an example, the last mayor of a nearby town foresaw the problems that «enforcing» changes to the town's main street (1 less car way, and
more parking space), would cause to his reputation, so he made public, electronic poll (with
voting stations on public spaces) on that district (and
lost).
A
more dramatic twist: Double the size of the House - every district now elects two seats: The final two opponents with the most
votes, and each one gets a
vote value based on their percentage of the voters, so they loser with 49 % of the
vote gets 0.49
votes in the house and the winner with 51 % of the
vote gets 0.512
votes in the house - this way the
losing side gets represented too.
The answer for the
losing parties is to work harder to win
more votes» From 2005 to 2010 the Lib Dems gained
votes nationally... and
lost seats.
The Tories secured the
votes of most former Ukip supporters, which prevented the party from
losing even
more seats, and helped it secure a handful of gains well away from the capital.
Gounardes Challenged Golden back in 2012 and garnered 42 % of the
vote to Golden's 57 %,
losing by slightly
more than 10,000
votes.
One of the key patterns in last year's general election results was a tendency for those who
voted Remain to swing
more to Labour than those who
voted Leave, while the Conservatives
lost ground amongst Remain voters while advancing amongst their Leave counterparts.
Three Republicans
voted «no,» one
more than McConnell could afford to
lose.
One
more or less inevitable consequence of this pattern is that Labour gained ground amongst those who
voted Yes in in the independence referendum in September 2014, while it
lost support amongst those who
voted No.
The United Monroe line is unusually potent for those purposes; Dan Castricone, who
lost a Republican primary to Brabenec and then ran on the United Monroe line in the 2014 Assembly race, won
more than 9,000
votes on that line alone.
Last year, despite winning
more votes the Conservatives
lost their parliamentary majority because the Labour
vote share went up by
more than did that for the Conservatives.
They were undone, however, by a collapse in the Liberal Democrat
vote which meant the party
lost more seats to Labour where Labour was the second - placed candidate than they gained directly from the Lib Dems where they were the challengers.
In The
Lost Majority, Lord Ashcroft draws on his unique research to explain why the thumping victory the Tories expected never happened: what real voters made of the campaign, why Britain refused Theresa May's appeal for a clear mandate to negotiate Brexit, where the party stands after
more than a decade of «modernisation» — and the Tories» mammoth task of building a winning coalition when 13 million
votes is not enough for victory.
America could
lose more than a million jobs if the Senate
votes to repeal the Affordable Care Act, according to a report from George Washington University's Milken Institute School of Public Health and the Commonwealth Fund.
More subtly, for a number of reasons (including to a greater or lesser extent, Brexit) Labour has generally been gaining
votes from the young and those in high social class jobs and areas which
voted remain in 2016, while
losing votes from older voters, those in lower social class occupations and those who
voted leave.
More likely results are a one seat gain for Democrats (e.g. Heller), a two seat gain for Republicans (e.g.
lose Heller but gain the seats of Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Jon Tester of Montana, and Joe Donnelly of Indiana; three Democrats known for the weakness of their 2012 Republican opponents), or a nine seat gain (e.g. every state
votes for Senator as it
voted for president in 2016).
If they signalled they wouldn't do so, two immediate points of interest come to mind: 1) If Labour were the largest party, or even in a whole UK majority, but the Tories were the largest rump UK party, the Liberal Democrats could
more easily claim a renewed coalition with the Conservatives was preferable to a centre - left alliance, since a government that would
lose its majority within a year would be unable to govern effectively; 2) A Labour or Labour - led government following a «yes»
vote would have an incentive to push back the date of independence as far as possible.
Here in the Hudson Valley and Catskills,
more than 65,000 people may
lose their health care because of last week's
vote.
Whilst those expecting to
lose were
more likely to regret their
vote, they were also in a minority.
The Democrats didn't flinch, for once, so Republicans couldn't
lose more than a
vote or two in the Senate, which they promptly did when the CBO produced a disastrous score for the bill.
Where it leads to
more Lib Dems
votes in Lib - Con marginals, the Tories evidently
lose.
Labour in opposition today faces a much
more confused situation, having
lost votes to UKIP and also the SNP.
But we forgot that the Tories remain the party with the largest number of
votes and strongest parliamentary representation in the country, and that the SNP
lost more seats to the Conservatives than to anyone.
There was little evidence of any equivalent relationship for Remain voters except that those who felt certain to
lose were a little
more likely to regret
voting to Remain.
Cuomo spent 35 Million plus to receive 1 Million few
votes than he did in 2010 and
lose more counties etc etc
The less you feel you have to
lose, the
more likely you are to
vote «Yes».
With
votes still to be tallied in a close race, Foley said he
more than likely
lost to incumbent Democratic Gov. Dannel Malloy in the general election, but would not concede the race until all the
votes were counted.
In 2015, though, Hawkins earned
more than 5,000
votes in a
losing race for city auditor and Cetera took 413
votes in the 2nd district.
As far as the national picture is concerned,
vote share matters
more than seats gained and
lost (Comments: 26)
«His deeply offensive attacks on Jewish people, bankers and political opponents are deliberate political calculations to attempt to gain
more votes in one area, than he thinks he will
lose in another.
Senior Conservatives privately admitted that the intervention of an outspoken Frenchmen is «
more likely to have won us
votes than
lost them».