Sentences with phrase «lost their child benefit»

«They are themselves in a two - year pay freeze, teachers and lecturers are facing redundancy, will lose child benefits and other benefits, are paying more VAT, their children stand to lose educational maintenance allowances and their children will also have to pay higher tuition fees to go to university.»

All of these things would appear to happen at once: * Start paying the new 40p rate on further earnings (reducing the value of the additional income) * Lose child benefit (the amount will differ according to the number of children, but could be # 2500 for 3 children), esp if there is no taper.

«I lose my child benefit,» Mr Osborne said, after being questioned by Ed Miliband's private secretary, Chuka Umunna.

Middle - earners face a «double whammy» as they are both pulled into the higher income bracket and subsequently lose their child benefits, Labour has claimed.

In 2013, two years before the election, top rate taxpayers will lose their child benefit and the first sick and disabled people will lose their employment support allowance under the time limit introduced 12 months earlier.

Chancellor George Osborne has announced that higher rate tax payers will lose child benefit from 2013.

«The Chancellor's policy on child benefit seems to be that a two - earner family on # 84,000 can keep all their child benefit, but a one - earner family on # 43,000 — whether that is a single parent, or where mum or dad stays at home to look after the kids — will lose all their child benefit, which is # 2,500 if the family has three kids.

But he wants it as a tax allowance to compensate higher earners who lost their child benefit.

Labour has attacked the coalition for the «unfairness» of the cut, pointing out that two parents with a combined income of # 87,998 can still receive the benefit if neither earns over # 44,000 - while a single parent earning just over the limit will lose all their child benefit.

Tory sources have played down the idea of this tax plan being used to compensate stay at home mothers who will lose their child benefit, but they have not ruled out the idea entirely.

Their parents may have just lost their child benefit for these very same children, but this is a generation that will now be asked to start their adult life already owing as much as # 40k.

Not exact matches

Even though alcoholism ranks as one of the country's three major health problems, along with cancer and heart disease; even though it accounts for approximately 98,000 deaths every year; even though it is the root cause of most pastoral - care crises (suicides, auto fatalities, child abuse, divorces, hospital admissions, accidental deaths and home violence); even though it costs the nation $ 120 billion annually in terms of lost work time, health and welfare benefits, property damage, medical expenses, insurance and lost wages; and even though its effects impair the educational process of every child in every classroom, still the church acts as though alcoholism does not exist.

If a person can no longer sponsor a child, that child doesn't «lose» the benefits of being a sponsored child (aside from the personal greetings and relationship with their sponsor).

Often, memories of the dead have spurred surviving parents on to good works that benefit humankind, all done as a legacy to the lost child.

What a shame to have lost our partner's ideas and perspectives when ultimately we could benefit and celebrate the fact that we have someone who is as interested and committed to the raising of our children as we are — someone who is willing to go out on a limb and share a new perspective that could benefit the whole family.

The implication is, if you can't have the self control to eat well, buy the formula advertised on the same page as this add (and put money in the pockets of the people who indirectly supported the add), because otherwise you're just feeding your baby hamburgers and donuts, and that is simply NOT true and hurtfully misleading and potentially damaging to mothers (emotionally and in lost long term positive health benefits to breastfeeding moms) and the short and long term health of their children.

Neuberger points to a study indicating that, for every additional 1 percent of school lunch applications audited nationwide, 30,000 eligible children will lose benefits.

It's worth noting that these complaints tend to come from parents at schools in which the free / reduced lunch population is low — most of these children are eating breakfast at home anyway, and the inconveniences and lost instructional time seem to outweigh any benefits of the program.

I give these readers my best advice, of course, but lately I've been yearning to show them the bigger picture: how these problems came to be, who benefits from the status quo (even as our kids lose out), and what we — both as individuals and as a society — could be doing to make a real difference in the lives and health of all American children.

Some children really do benefit from child - centred or autonomous style learning, perhaps more so when they have never been to school and never lose their questioning, eager enthusiasm.

The Snap - in - Place ™ System on the Slumber Sleeper ™ also has the additional benefit of allowing children to bring their favorite Slumber Silkie ™ or Slumber Swan ™ to bed with them and keep it within hands reach without fear of entanglement or losing it in the middle of the night after being tossed from the crib or bed.

All proceeds benefit Camp Kesem and our nationwide network of free summer camps ensuring the organization's ability support more of the 5 + million children who have a parent with cancer, or who have lost a parent to cancer.

He was reporting to the parliamentary committee on human rights a week after it emerged HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has lost two computer discs containing personal information of child benefit claimants.

Starting from today lone parents whose children are aged 12 or over will be forced to actively seek work for a minimum of 16 hours per week or risk losing 40 per cent of their benefit.

The freeze will hit the poorest third in society the hardest and cause working families with children lose as much as # 490 a year in child benefit and tax credits.

Conservative officials said a working couple with one child, with each parent earning # 13,000 a year, would lose # 44 a year in child benefit and # 310 a year in tax credits.

But there is nothing fair about Child Benefit changes that leave a single earner on # 45,000 losing thousands of pounds, while a family on # 80,000 gets to keep every penny.

Labour is distancing itself from a proposal by the party's policy review chief Jon Cruddas that benefit claimants could be forced to give their children the MMR vaccination - or face losing their payouts.

: «Confidential details of 15 million child benefit recipients are on a computer disc lost by HM Revenue and Customs, the BBC understands... Chancellor Alistair Darling is to give a Commons statement on «a major operational problem» at 1530 GMT.

Since the HM Revenue and Customs discs containing child benefit data went missing, it has also emerged that three million motorists» details have been lost in transit in Iowa in the US Midwest.

Mr Gray resigned when the news broke that HMRC had lost two computer discs with the confidential details of 25 million child benefit claimants in the post.

Both the chancellor and transport secretary apologised in the Commons after 25 million child benefit claimants and three million learner drivers had their identities lost by government blunders in the last two months of 2007.

Labour's shadow work and pensions secretary Rachel Reeves said millions of working families would lose money if the reports were true and urged Cameron to «come clean with the public about their plans to cut child benefit and child tax credits».

When the cut to child benefit for higher rate tax payers takes affect in 2013, it is clear many middle to high income earners will lose out.

And they may soon be joined by a Labour Party that wants wealthy pensioners to lose out on similar grounds, but that is opposed to the child benefit cuts.

«It can not be right that a two - earner family each earning # 42,000 would keep all their child benefit, but a single - earner family on # 43,000 would lose it all at a stroke.»

The major policy announcement on free school meals was the obvious move in this direction — as well as being a sop to middle class voters who lost out after cuts to child benefit — but Nick Clegg's speech is full of references to policies which help in day - to - day life: the pupil premium, flexible parental leave, free childcare, a cap on social care costs.

That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Welfare Benefits Up - rating Bill because it fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000Benefits Up - rating Bill because it fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000 a year.

This includes 3 million families who lose only from the freezes to child benefit, at an average of about # 75 per year.

So high rate taxpayers lose # 1billion of child benefit.

In light of the scandal of child benefit data being lost in 2007, the Government laid down minimum standards for data protection.

5.25 pm: David Cameron has not ruled out using the tax system to partially compensate families who will lose out from the loss of child benefit.

Move would partly compensate those losing out from decision to cut child benefit for higher earners

11.11 am: The Tories are not planning to revise their transferable tax allowance plans so that they would benefit the higher - rate taxpayers who will lose out from the child benefit cut, I've been told.

11.06 am: Alan Duncan, the international development minister, told Sky that many parents who will lose out from the abolition of child benefit for higher - rate taxpayers do not really need the money.

What was particularly interesting, though, was the suggestion that stay - at - home mums who will lose out from the child benefit decision could be compensated by the introduction of transferable tax allowances.

He also said the Tories wanted to introduce a transferable tax allowance to help stay at home mothers, but aides admit this policy would not help the higher rate taxpayers losing out from the child benefit cut.

Some of the changes include families with one parent earning more than # 50,000 losing part of their child benefit.

Require «able - bodied» Medicaid enrollees to pay child support and participate in child - paternity testing or face losing benefits.

Certainly if you continue, as I would recommend to use the single vaccine, you do not incur a greater risk of those diseases in the children, so that you do not lose the benefits of vaccination if you space them over time.