Not exact matches
Clearly my
bias is showing, and there's obviously a
lot more nuance to both partiest, the main issue though is that parties can be hijacked and have been on both sides which leaves the large majority of moderates voting for the
lesser of two evils and hoping that the candidate that they vote for will drop the pandering they did to the fringe and go moderate.
With religion being a
lot less prominent in the Nordic countries there is so much
less of it in politics and much
less chance of religiously
biased legislation being enacted.
Especially since USA is a
lot less worried about nukes in Iran compared to say KSA which you didn't even mention (I'll randomly guess because it doesn't fit your own
bias that this is all about Israel)
Ratings by impartial outsiders are
less biased, but teacher - rating forms still have a
lot of room for improvement.
Your whole line of commentary is a whole
lot of heavily
biased speculation on games that aren't even available for us to review much
less actually * PLAY *.
When these
biases are taken into account, the «unusual global warming» that everybody has become so worried about becomes a
lot less «unusual».