Sentences with phrase «lot of alarmist»

As you have personally experienced, vicious slander seems to be the default response to anyone raising a question at a lot of alarmist blogs and from people like Michael Mann.

But David Rose's article has clearly upset a lot of you alarmist types.....

As a quid - pro-quo I am not convinced by a lot of the alarmist projections either.

There is a lot of alarmist coverage of Hurricane Irene, but the storm may change its course, weaken over the cooler ocean waters off the middle of the east coast, and come ashore, if at all, as a weaker storm — still dangerous, but short of Stormageddon.

Not exact matches

* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change

What if the expertise of global warming alarmists is undeniable but the injury they seek to prevent can be compared to a trip and fall hazard faced by all of humanity caused by a difference of one - quarter inch in elevation between a parking lot and a sidewalk in front of a Mississippi Walmart?

When people say action on climate will destroy the economy, that's kind of an alarmist thing, without a lot of evidence.

In other words, this Tex86 proxy (which is being used very extensively in the warming alarmist literature now and is showing more warming in the past for example as a result of small changes in CO2), needs a lot more work in calibration and is probably mis - calibrated.

It doesn't take a lot of searching, even on this blog, to find alarmists going on about «cooking the planet», «several metres sea - level rise», «global crop failures», «kids dying from the heat», etc etc etc..

I always suspected Stefan and Murh weren't real people, just inventions of you or one of the other alarmist truebelievers, who you make spout a lot of drivel, as you try and discredit we sinners guilty of climate blasphemy.

When the world's real scientists, engineers and mathematicians focused their attention on the AGW alarmists arguments, they discovered dodgy math, unfounded and hyped claims, deleted data that disproves their theories, a biased and manipulated peer review process and a lot of propaganda thrown on top.

I have a lot of sympathy for that view as the alarmists have failed to answer a lot of pertinent questions about their hypothesis, or provided at the very least shaky and questionable workarounds to them in order to keep their wagon rolling.

David I think we are going to see a lot (in fact a lolwot) of this frothing at the mouth as the alarmists start to realise the CO2 thingy has been over egged.

Its pretty clear they want alarmist posts and that the site is leftish in orientation (you just have to look at the issues you can check off that interest you — lots of things like «societal entrepreneurship» but nothing on individual liberty or checks on government power).

I do know a lot of people who are Alarmist Skeptics.

-- There is a lot of money to be made in the «green» industry — Alarmist claims brings more funding (supports many careers) and... — A lot of youth votes are to be won by politicians.

But if this study is correct — something we can't be certain of, given that a lot of it seems rather too dependent on calculations based on models rather than rigorously measured data — then surely the alarmists should be celebrating rather than panicking.

I'd take them a lot more seriously if they'd back off the same kinds of talk they criticize the «alarmists» over.

«You can save yourselves a lot of time, and generally be correct, by simply assuming that EVERY SCARY PREDICTION the global warming alarmists express is FALSE.»

So I think we've seen a tiny bit of warming in the last 20 years but if you believe the alarmists we should have seen a lot.

I'm sure a lot of people from the alarmist camp will be outraged at my use of incompetence as a description, but what else adequately describes the dogged defense of patent nonsense.

He explained a lot on his way out the door about what motivates the global warming alarmists, admitting in his resignation letter that global warming isn't science — it's religion: «For me the protection of Planet Earth, the survival of all species and sustainability of our ecosystems is more than a mission.

I'm sorry for being an alarmist but I'm sick and tired of seeing a lot of naive outlook on life from this blogger.

For me, though, I think alarmist scientists would do a lot more for their credibility by simply embracing integrity and transparency and by beginning the basic rudiments of a quality system.

That something like 90 % of academic scientists are liberals, hence alarmists, explains a lot here.