Sentences with phrase «lot of global problems»

It will fix a lot of global problems.

Not exact matches

Technology can solve a lot, and it buys us time to solve other problems, but it's one element of a global system.

On the whole Bitcoin and related technologies are starting to get a lot of attention from larger players who see these technological advancements as possible solutions to global problems.

A lot of non-profits are badly positioned to solve big scalable, global problems, while tech companies are.

Choudary said it was often not enough to nurture local competition because «the problem with platforms, a lot of platforms have global network effects, global domination, which is that they are uniformly visible across the world and having all users in one platform is much more useful than having a local platform.»

Isn't the problem that the global position, due to modern travel, modern transport and modern communications, sovereign funds, multinationals, free trade agreements and a world trade organisation which is overpowering the capacity of a lot of countries to control their own sovereignty and destiny.

ELECTRONIC waste is a global problem — with an interesting corollary: there's an awful lot of computer power just sitting doing nothing in those dumps.

When LDL is driven too low, it's no wonder that a lot of patients develop memory problems or pre-Alzheimer's, or even total global amnesia, which is really losing one's memory.

A lot of students fail to get the high grades for their problem and solution essay writing because of they make use of some global topics, which it is impossible to find any solution to.

It's a good PR gimmick for the Guardian, and I mean that is a positive way: the story will get lots of ink and will be picked up by the international wire services like AP and Reuters, spreading the word far and wide, and the blogosphere will pick it up as well, and the news of the Guardian's picks will be useful in helping to make more and more people aware of the very real problems of climate change and global warming.

As discussed above, each of the groups making gridded products goes to a lot of trouble to eliminate problems (such as UHI) or jumps in the records, so the global means you see are not simple means of all data (this NCDC page explains some of the issues in their analysis).

Secondly, while there are indeed lots of other unsustainable human impacts on ecosystems and the Earth's biosphere generally, the rapidly escalating effects of anthropogenic global warming threaten to overwhelm all of those other problems in the very near future, with devastating impacts not only for human civilization and the human species, but for all life on Earth, for a long, long time.

There's been a lot of talk lately about the food crisis, and particularly linking it to growing crops for biofuels (a highly inefficient process which seems to drive prices up, particularly in US policy), but Frances More Lappe argued in her books several years ago that there is, in fact, enough food on the planet to feed us all, but localized political troubles (grain rotting in Haitian ports), increasing desertification, food waste, and problems with global supply chains are better explanations for why so many go hungry.

One of the unavoidable realities attending global warming — a reality that makes it the perfect problem — is that there is plenty of remaining uncertainty, even as the basics have grown ever firmer (my litany: more CO2 = warmer world = less ice = rising seas and lots of climate shifts).

Global warming initially got a lot of publicity from a minor drought at the end of the 80's I believe (minor compared to the dust bowl years), since then there hasn't been much unusual drought wise in the US (ie the droughts that have happened have been even less serious than the end of 80's situtation, let alone by comparison with the dust bowl years), but this hasn't exactly caused any problems.

The problem is there are a lot of people who don't want global warming to be true.

That effortless segue of Dr Stewart's («The problem is there are a lot of people who don't want global warming to be true.

And so long as that's the case, a lot of conservatives are likely to remain skeptical that global warming is an urgent problem in need of solving.

«Scary stuff, but there's just one problem for Obama: comments a couple years ago made by his wife Michelle suggest that being in a crowded circus with lots of dust and particles in the air triggered their daughter's asthma, not global warming.

Nonetheless, both of these potential problems are in keeping with the main point of this essay, which is that the science is not «settled» and there is actually quite a lot of debate over man - made global warming theory within the scientific community.

It would be interesting to hear how your readers view his positions and the need to establish the future state of the global climate before embarking on a lots of tactical solutions to a percieved problem.

He said that from an economic point of view, it would be more rational to spend lots of money on today's other big problems, and only make small and limited changes in policies relating to global warming, such as a slight increase in gasoline or carbon taxes.

We continually cut trees, throwing garbage any where we want, chemical waste from different industries are thrown in the bodies of water, smoke coming from cars, factories and even at home are not properly handled, there's still a lot of problems that we can address to each and every one but if we will not move or take any action in response to this issue our planet would die little by little, as we see earth today is now showing to us the damage we had made such as earth quake, landslide, acid rain, global warming and a lot more.

The problem with global warming is that will take a lot of effort to reverse and in reality, time is running out on the return on investment and cost / benefit ratios.

Instead of reevaluating the way in which every one of us lives our lives (in terms of material consumption, housing patterns, transportation patterns, dietary norms) to build societies which are radically lower in carbon emissions than they are currently, just spend a lot on money trying to tinker with global ecosystems to correct for global problems which were caused by us in the first place.

Tony, this an awful lot to ask of a skeptic in order to get them to the point of «global problem».

Oh and there's also global warming and ISIS and a lot of other problems that we need to fix.