Sentences with phrase «lot of human error»

I also believe there is a lot of human error, various types of mistakes, and non inspired content.

Not exact matches

A lot of times, human error will cause an injury.

Also, there are a lot of machine - reading issues where many votes are not counted at all that should have been («undercounts») where examination of the ballot can show clear intent, or, if there was a machine tabulation error, that machine tabulation error would not affect a human being.

Peter Forster, a geneticist at the University of Cambridge, says mistakes happen a lot — between 60 percent and 70 percent of published studies of sequences of human mitochondrial DNA contain significant errors.

Using more than one systems for reporting will just mean lots of duplicate data entry, as well as a higher risk of human error and the chance people, will be working from different versions of the same document.

Not only will this save you lots of time when you need to produce your reports, but it will also cut down the chance of human error playing a part in your data as everything will be compiled automatically.

There is a lot of measurement error and there is some «human system bias» dependent on eyesight, tiredness, etcetera, but «subjectivity» is the wrong word.

Measuring the distance apart and speed of 2 satellites in space orbiting the earth to the width of a human hair with no margin for error [damn those drift recalculations], and taking into account unknown factors with respect to the true values for water depth, water weight at different salt concentrations, ice depth magma flows, volcanic activity etc [ie making a lot of guesses], plus taking human motivation on board [like CO2 increase must melt ice surely] can give you an accurate measurement of the volume ice in Antarctica.

Whether it's an adjustment of the orbit of a satellite, a mis - calibration of a sensor, an unrecorded shift in station location, a corruption of the data logger or a human error, these problems often only get fixed after a lot of work.

This would also save lots of time and fuel, as well as lives if these systems can be made significantly less error - prone than humans (and once that's been clearly shown, more people will trust their cars to drive themselves in more types of environments).

Well, as human error fades from the transportation system, a lot of really great benefits will result.

to replace a lot of the trivial roles in the payroll department, and it eliminates the human error in all the processes.

Software is already created to replace a lot of the trivial roles in the payroll department, and it eliminates the human error in all the processes.