Sentences with phrase «lot of points because»

«Waterbourne got a whole lot of points because they were so much less than any of the other bidders.»

Wenger must be watching a different Arsenal to the rest of us we've dropped a lot of points because we aren't good enough fact!

Not exact matches

Blodget: And how do you look at brand versus direct response because a lot of people will say that digital is fantastic from a direct response point of view - tough to build brand.

Because of the way frequent flyer programs work, you can usually get a lot more value from a lot fewer miles than credit card points.

The point is that at near zero interest rates, the U.S. has a lot of buffer on this front, so if there is a reduction in the economy, it will be because of a substantial disconnect between supply and demand.

Interestingly, Wills points out that Air Start has never tried to maximize its return on these deals; he admits the company leaves «a lot on the table» because the point of differentiation is service quality.

As was pointed out on the panel, a lot of that cash is being held overseas because of the tax laws in the U.S.; it's taxed 30 %.

«The stakes are high for us, too, because we are trying to attract a lot of users at this point,» Mauskopf says.

High Point makes no attempt whatsoever to be a one - stop service provider — because that would require lots of people.

«I think all new technologies have an element of being a little bit scary, and I think it's easier to see the downsides than the upsides because the upsides require a lot more imagination, but in every point in the past, new technology has had many more upsides than downsides,» he said.

«But Ryan's employers are having him there because he's been cleared and you have to remember, Ryan has relationships with a lot of people personally,» he said, pointing to Oscars host Jimmy Kimmel's recent announcement that he will let Seacrest interview him: «Listen, you know, we should at the very least afford people the opportunity for truth, what the facts of the story are before hanging them out to dry,» Kimmel told Variety.

If you stayed the course during that time, things worked out pretty well, because you bought at the low point of the stock market, and you contributed more and can you imagine that tax lot that you invested in, in March 2009, where that is right now.

As for ProShares, «you could argue from a business point of view that was a good decision because they're now going to get a lot of the [Credit Suisse] XIV refugees.»

My point was to refute your argument that just because lots of people believe something, that makes it true.

My point of the distinction on hell was made because earlier someone had brought up a literal hell — that is, when people die, their bodies actually are sent to some place where there's lots of fire and burning and weeping.

Well, this person must have been asleep or only ten years old at the time because I'm old and I remember quite a lot of noise at the time.At one point it looked like JFK might not make it, but to the delight of most voters..

Great theory can hide a lot of dysfunction, because they can always point to the ideals.

It's a point a lot of people got because that's what a savior is — and it's a point I have made here before, so you were....

At this point it's not so much anyone believing, because a lot of them won't, but simply saying God is right, while they rally against him.

Evil happens in the world because evil happens, atheists don't blame god for it, but just point out that if your god exists and we're wrong, then he has a lot of explaining to do.

Writing about Humanae Vitae just a month after Pope Paul VI issued it, at which point lots of Catholics, including a goodly number of Jesuits, had popped a cork, the then - superior general asked his fellow Jesuits to assume an attitude of «obedience which is at once loving, firm, open, and truly creative» and «to do everything possible to penetrate, and to help others penetrate, into the thought which may not have been his own previously» - precisely because they were Jesuits, and this is what Jesuits do.

Thought I'd point that out, because a lot of people tend to take things too literally.

I have spent a lot of time laboring this very obvious point, because although it is obvious it is important.

got a lot of sensitive people here, likely doing as much wrong as they can, and feeling subconscious guilt because someone's pointing it out..

I agree with you Tim, the premise of the article leads one to believe that because LDS has a big accredited university with deep theological minds and some leader of a big Christian seminary, again a deep theological mind, head knowledge not heart knowledge, that Mormonism should be recognized as a stream of Christianity.How Mormons differ is how they relate to Christ and the Holy Spirit.Only people who have encountered Jesus and thus a changed life, can be called an evangelical.Mormnism is man made religion.The Holy Spirit always points people to Jesus, not another man - Joseph Smith.Great moral people, who do lots of good and build beautiful tabernacles, but then again the Pharisees did too.

I feel a lot of empathy with Brand's position and his questions, because I came from a similar philosophical and cultural starting point before I became a Christian.

As society becomes more and more accepting of gay people, there will be a lot less talk of «reparative therapy» because what's the point?

As a christian apologist, Chad, has 2000 years of «facts and testimony» to draw on to defend the delusion, not to the degree of proof or evidence; only to the point that a whole lot of people bought into the scam, therefore the scam is true based on the bible, why, because a 2000 year old book, that very same bible says so, which completes the circle.

I got the idea for the sauce from Lindsay's new cookbook — her almond sauce though (for 2 servings) calls for 1/2 a cup of sesame oil (I need to ask her if that is right, because that's a lot of oil and sesame oil can be very overpowering) which would have meant the sauce in her dish would be 17 points per serving, without the food included.

I must have had a really stupid look on my face, because she pointed at the other lunchmeat packages: «See, you've got your honey ham, your smoked ham, lots of different kinds of ham.

I have a question since you know WW points and I do not... if I added a layer of quinoa in the bottom of the dish to «bulk up» the recipe (because I never know what other dishes will be showing up and would rather have a starch included) and absorb some of the delicious chicken liquid, would it add a whole lot of extra WW points or just a few?

They have lots of points — maybe because of the high sodium content.

At one point I felt like I wasn't a great food photographer because I didn't have a lot of the dark, moodier shots.

I found it very inaccurate because MFP assumes lots of things about ingredients and I also understand that they round up every time so you could easily get 4 more carb points per serving.

I support Wenger but not because I am a «fanboy» but because I believe in his values, I disagree with a lot he has done, and maybe he should leave the club to pave way for fresh ideas, but the point I was trying to make is that we can still turn this season into something we can be proud of, if we don't then come June I expect that we will (respectively) call for change and it will be our duty to make the board listen, but June is still a half a season away.

«I can understand that [people think the negativity will return] but overall I believe there were a lot of positives in the game as well because we created many chances, we had great domination and unfortunately we dropped three points.»

It was because we had a lot of clean sheets early last season that we could get a lot of points and still make 4th despite the disasters that came later.

Arsenal have had lots of talented youngsters coming through the Hale End Academy, and the whole point of staying with us is because Arsene wenger had a big reputation for blooding youngsters in the first team, usually via playing in the League Cup.

«The Gunners do already have a lot of options up front though, even if Joel Campbell and Lukas Podolski are sold this summer»... I was wondering if the author of the article could point out those options... Because, apart from Giroud and may be Walcott, I can not remember who they are (those options)...!!

«He has won us a lot of points when he has come on because he has scored lots of times.

If recent rumour's are true (a big if because there is a lot of mischief making in the press) then this points to a crisis at the club.

Failure shouldn't necessarily be blamed on transfers.It's part of the reason but is not the only reasons.Other clubs which can't even buy like Arsenal have won very good trophies.Even at those times we were in debt we had a good team capable of winning the EPL or winng some of the smaller trophies.But we just went on trophyless.Now we are almost debt free and we are promised glory but honestly we don't even have the hope of glory.The only thing that can save us is renewal of the mind of the manager and board.That will bring a positive change.It's only insanity to keep doing the same thing and expect different results.We have a lot to prove out there to the world because the greatness of Arsenal has really gone down in the face of the world.They only see us as a team with good football that's all.The world doubts us and we have a point to prove.The values of a club is as important as winning trophies.If not Arsenal wouldn't have been this top club that people talk about everyday were it fpr only values or trophies.They go hand in hand.However, to the world trophies are very important and that fact can not be hidden.

Lots of in - state rivalries are said to have a dynamic in which the «Little Brother's» players feel an extra oomph because they did not get offers from the bigger programs and therefore play their best to prove a point, but Michigan - Michigan State seems to be the rivalry where this dynamic most plays out most frequently.

Anyway point is a lot of people will form their opinion of Moore because of these dummies.

largely because CWT is inheriting a team that has a lot of talent that finished with a winning record and a bowl win last year which is so unlike his previous 3 stops where he inherited absolute train - wrecks with losing records and had them improved and pointing north his very first year.

3 points, thanks alexis... so, where are those who wants alexis on the bench because of he lose too much the ball... those who wants a team with 11 elnenys, passing sidelines, 98 % of posession but losing 1 - 0 anyway... god helps us when alexis leave the club... there sre a lot of people who needs to leave the club... alexis is the last, arsene rhe first... and some morons were talking about iwobi or welbeck being better than alexis??

they do nt concede lots of goals because they have 70 per cent posession most games... as quality teams worked this out and focused on defending deep and counterattacking, their weak points were quickly recognised and that was pique....

Apart from that I can name more errors than good saves, and a lot of points missed because of awful goalkeeping.

«I think they should have more points than they have so far, because they had games where they lost in the last minute and dropped a lot of points in the last five minutes of games,» Cech said.

And I know lot of you want to blame the board, I'm simply going to point out Steve Bruce quit is position because the board intervened in his transfer affairs, whilst our «caring manager» claims his # 8 million pounds a year salary and the Arsenal fans gladly fund that through astronomical ticket prices, whilst we reminisce about that time «we won something» and celebrate the fact we finish fourth!