Sentences with phrase «lots of debate on»

There's lots of debate on how to value ASFI and its competitors, complicated by uncertainty regarding valuation of their purchased receivables.

There is a lot of debate on freewill, predestination, and etc..

There's obviously quite a lot of debate on here around Giroud.

I see a lot of debate on here about Matt's worth.

The recent Premier League transfer window has, as ever, sparked a lot of debate on social media from fans and pundits.

There is a lot of debate on the «perfect» amount of time to hold a stretch, and you can count to 30 if you like.

While there is a lot of debate on these topics, one thing all successful bodybuilders have in common is that they lift weights.

There has been a lot of debate on how infrared saunas help with weight loss recently.

I like learning new things that I find interesting, I like to do a lot of reading, I like to do a lot of debating on topics that interest me, I like people watching (even when they are acting absurd), I like listening to a variety of music (UNlike a lot of people, I genuinely do), and I like to...

There is a lot of debate on whether one kind of publishing is better or more respectable than another.

There is a lot of debate on how you should price your eBook and you shouldn't be afraid to experiment with different price points to see what works for you.

There's a lot of debate on the topic at the moment (best article I've seen lately is Early Retirement Now's «Ultimate Guide To Withdrawal Rates», which I encourage you to read).

There is a lot of debate on the topic.

Today I ask a question that generates a lot of debate on our Facebook page: what happens if you stop paying your debts?

There is a lot of debate on whether pet parents should buy packaged pet food for their dogs.

There is a lot of debate on whether or not aggression can be trained out of a dog.

With Carlos and Stella, it seemed that there was a lot of debate on who should be the «alpha» of the dog pack.

There's a lot of debate on whether or not the fees should be dropped.

[Response: There is a lot of debate on this issue, and definitive statements one way or the other are (at present) unsupportable.

But there is a lot of debate on the «mitigation» and «consequences» fronts, too.

There is a lot of debate on two points — operating expenses and lease options.

There has been a lot of debate on BP about this topic, so just do a search for more information.

Not exact matches

«In the financial industry, there's been a lot of debate, post — financial crisis, around different approaches to risk and gender difference,» says Brenda Trenowden, global head of funds at ANZ Banking Group in London and a member of the steering committee of the 30 % Club, which works to get more women on corporate boards.

Sure, at debates, like last night's great one in Milwaukee, candidates are always asked questions that begin with, «As president, will you...» but we all know that presidents alone can't really do anything but put their socks on or, in more recent years, play a lot of golf.

There's been a lot of debate in media industry circles about whether the media helped create the Donald Trump phenomenon by constantly writing about him and putting him on television in an attempt to drive traffic and ratings.

Plenty of internal angst and debate is taking place on how to get from here to there, what is needed, what should be done, and what a lot of people think.

I know a lot of friends who will debate to the end of the earth a few half percents of interest on funds but neglect that actually investing more money would probably be the first step.

Besides that, you might see a lot of heated debate on boards like these, but in real life, do you think that atheists seek out Christians in the street or in the stores or at the workplace and berate them?

It actually reminds me of a lot of the debate going on around the sexuality and gender issues.

Discussions and debates are more productive when all parties are well - informed on their positions, and it's hard to know a lot of information if the only thing you've read about a topic is the headline to an article you didn't look at.

Wow a lot of debate going on here.

I have a lot of faith in science, not in the unscientific assumption that atheists make that reality is purely mechanistic, but in the procedures of testing hypotheses, questioning assumptions, measuring results, replicating experiments, and in general debating and persuading based on actual evidence.

I see a lot on both sides of the DEBATE, that do not know how to have an argument all of the time.

The debate has become quite shrill and angry; a lot of finger - pointing going on.

Meanwhile the opposing side is made of largely a lot of seemingly logical «smart» often well educated people who are ironically no where nearly as «smart» as people out there generally think or realize so it literally becomes a debate of ignorant verses stupid on both sides which I do as a footnote occasionally find mildly entertaining.

I tend to keep a lot of push back from people on both sides on the debate.

Politicians in particular use these hot button issues to generate a lot of heat and light during speeches and debates, but when their cheering const - ituents go home and the bedroom lights go out, something entirely different must be going on.

The chairman of Christian Aid also appeared to blame the ongoing debate over Europe on a growing sense of nationalism in the UK, he said: «With the Scottish independence agitation and all the questions about a federal UK quite a lot of people feel we need to affirm now what we are, what we distinctively are as English even more than British and that imperceptibly I think strengthens some of this unease about that mysterious entity called Europe which is over there.»

Hey I will admit that they do a lot of good but I can understand both sides of that argument but come on Oslo, lets stick with the school debate... no use running now

Less than artful Democrats can accomplish a lot in the absence of any genuine conservative leadership and one myth being advertised by Democrats I actually wish was true is the existence of focused and organized opposition on the part of conservatives who demand, if nothing else, a transparent national debate.

I believe that the three days has a relevance on which there are lots of debates and understanding... i feel that and understand that Jesus died as a son of man (human), and rose up as a Son of God (God Himself).

The gang also calls Science Mike for a very creepy update about a newly found object in our galaxy, discusses Netflix spying on its customers, debates the merits of Christmas traditions and a lot more!

I've read a lot of the more controversial postings recently (such as the recent ones on Hell and Homosexuality as well as some older ones about the definition of the gospel) where it seems that the debates in the comment section always fail (at least for me) to help those who are trying to learn.

Jesus the Son of Marry (Peace and blessings be up on him) is known today to the Christian world as it is being described by John, Paul, Luke and others... whatever the way these human imagined him became the faith... record shows that the first book of NT was written at least 60 - 80 years after Jesus the son of Marry was taken away from this earth... and these writers used their vision as a weapon to get it to the brain of mankind... also there are debates among the Christian scholars that no one knows who is the writer of some of the gospels... someone else wrote it and used the names what we see today... i.e. no one knows when and who and how the Hebrew chapters were written... despite of lots of controversy on this, Christian scholars uses them to teach others...

I'm not saying that there is no debate on the events and teachings of the Bible — just that even secular scholars regard a lot of the New Testament as historically accurate.

Understandably there is a lot of argument as to what Paul is actually referring to and there is a lot of debate between each religion on the topic.

As I thought about how to apply these teachings practically, a lot of strategies came to mind — putting the needs of others before my own, buying less and giving more, humbling myself when engaged in political or theological debates, embracing rather than complaining about those «one - way relationships,» praying for others more sincerely, saying «yes» a little more often, working on that ubiquitous sense of entitlement and pride that keeps me from going the extra mile.

Personally, I think there is a lot of unwarranted elation on one side of the «debate» and a lot of fear mongering on the other.

There is lots of debate in the commentaries and scholarly articles about whether it was really the apostles who doubted or someone else, and whether or not they really doubted, or it was just an inquisitive faith, or maybe they didn't really doubt Jesus, but they doubted that this person who appeared to them this time was really Jesus, and on and on it goes.

Hi Jun, it's of course debated a lot based on definitions of veganism but no as it comes from bees, honey for a lot of people isn't strictly vegan.