Sentences with phrase «love language as»

More often than not, you probably won't «speak» the same love language as your spouse.
Physical touch may seem like one of the more straightforward of Gary Chapman's five languages, but in a culture where touch can be misinterpreted on all kinds of levels, it is often the most misunderstood love language as well.
However, this book has made me more aware of what I think is my primary love language and my partner's love language as well.
My default love language as the giver is acts of service.
If you've been reading my posts lately you've probably noticed I've been featuring Love Languages and how we can learn about our own love language as well as how others like to be loved.
But then the more I thought about this particular son I realized that «acts of service» is his primary love language as well.
Chapman describes those five love languages as:
Children and parents alike will experience firsthand the power of the love languages as they cuddle up and spend precious time together reading this book over and over again.

Not exact matches

We're referring to them as workplace communication languages, simply because saying workplace love language seems little bit red flag - ish to HR.
But I was just amazed by how everyone, young and old wanted to be involved... and was so deeply enriched and touched by the experience and the laughter and the love I experienced from the people I met and how women would in particular open their hearts to me and tell me the stories of where they've come from, particularly because I have the language and was coming there as a woman and just how touched they were that I was there as a woman from England who's learned the language and who's an artist and running this project and come all the way to see them so they didn't feel forgotten I think that was pretty much what they felt... that their stories were being heard so they don't feel forgotten knowing the tents would be around the world.
Kohl was much more comfortable than Merkel with the language of German patriotism (the Prussian tradition loves to obsess over guilt, and sees the language of German patriotism as being «tainted»).
Nicole Calma loves Jesus, her friends and family and her life as a Ph.D. student studying language and music in the brain.
As love becomes merely a passion, as safety becomes merely a term for never being contradicted, as victimhood and oppression are turned into subjective categories rooted in emotional psychology, the very language by which we understand virtues, well - being, and concern becomes not a tool for care but a barrier preventing us from carinAs love becomes merely a passion, as safety becomes merely a term for never being contradicted, as victimhood and oppression are turned into subjective categories rooted in emotional psychology, the very language by which we understand virtues, well - being, and concern becomes not a tool for care but a barrier preventing us from carinas safety becomes merely a term for never being contradicted, as victimhood and oppression are turned into subjective categories rooted in emotional psychology, the very language by which we understand virtues, well - being, and concern becomes not a tool for care but a barrier preventing us from carinas victimhood and oppression are turned into subjective categories rooted in emotional psychology, the very language by which we understand virtues, well - being, and concern becomes not a tool for care but a barrier preventing us from caring.
We become ourselves, as infants, by learning to love and to speak, and we have language in particular as a gift from other people.
I want to ask you, as clearly as I can, to bear with patience all that is unresolved in your heart, and try to love the questions themselves, as if they were rooms yet to enter or books written in a foreign language.
I think unfortunately it is not as straightfoward as neglecting to fire someone or make them «step down» (got ta love that image - preserving language, eh?)
Most of us are familiar with the love languages concept for marriages by Dr. Chapman, but this book for children has been a huge help for the ways that I don't receive love in the same ways as my tinies.
His extraordinary gifts as poet — and these are the most salient aspects of what he has left behind — enable him to reach everyone who loves to watch or hear language do everything it can do.
But I think there is some risk that it might be misconstrued so as to obscure certain truths which I believe to be fundamental: that the Passion is the moment at which that complete oneness with the Father which is the unique and all - pervading characteristic of the life of Jesus is paradoxically manifested; that it is at that moment, above all, that Jesus discloses to us God himself in action; that the judgement passed on Jesus and the testing brought to bear upon him are a judgement and a testing exercised (of course, within the permissive will of God) by evil men, or, to use mythological language, by the devil; and that the judgement of God pronounced at Calvary is that which Christ's accepting love passes upon those men, and upon ourselves as sharers in their sinfulness, by showing up their sin in all its hatefulness.
In a time when tweets and status updates dominate the communication landscape, we must — as Christians — reclaim our interactions and demonstrate how we can love one another with our language.
As young couples «in love» know intuitively (but married couples often forget), appreciation is the language of love because it is the food for nurturing self - esteem.
It is distressingly banal to reduce Paul's language about sin and grace, about disobedience and love, to the level of cultural attitudes (toward, for example, «imperial ideology»), though such a reduction often passes itself off as theology in some seminary classrooms today.
As the Church, we're comfortable when it comes to talking about courtship, love languages, marriage and raising a family.
I would like to beg you, dear Sir, as well as I can, to have patience with everything unresolved in your heart and to try to love the questions themselves as if they were locked rooms or books written in a very foreign language.
Let's go on just for fun... it seems as if the following quote goes with your «food fight being friend sight seeing» [Well maybe you've realized I love naively «misusing» language including nonsensical neglect of grammar and punctuation rules].
It would be more in accord with the spirit of myth to regard man as just one element in an infinite universe — even the New Testament does so in clear and classical language; it says, not «God so loved mankind», but «God so loved the world».
Nevertheless it is a present fact; and even if we dislike the language that is popularly used, the truth is exactly as one popular song of the earlier part of this century put it: «It's love and love alone the world is seeking.»
«We have just religion enough to make us hate, but not enough to make us love another» wrote Jonathan Swift.4 He may be pressing his point, but it seems as if religious language is more specific articulating the role, place, needs, concerns of its own people and is if anything rather general when addressing the other as significant other.
Since mixes are my love language, I created a Monkey Town Mix for readers — a playlist meticulously selected to give you just the right ambiance as you work through the story.
As Ogden indicates, this can be expressed in nonmythological language: «Jesus» office as the Christ consists precisely in his being the bearer, through word and deed and tragic destiny, of the eternal word of God's love, which is the transcendent meaning of all created things and the final event before which man must decide his existence.&raquAs Ogden indicates, this can be expressed in nonmythological language: «Jesus» office as the Christ consists precisely in his being the bearer, through word and deed and tragic destiny, of the eternal word of God's love, which is the transcendent meaning of all created things and the final event before which man must decide his existence.&raquas the Christ consists precisely in his being the bearer, through word and deed and tragic destiny, of the eternal word of God's love, which is the transcendent meaning of all created things and the final event before which man must decide his existence.»
Here is the sheer miracle of it: a literature that long antedated our glorious gains in science and the immense scope of modern knowledge, which moves in the quiet atmosphere of the ancient countryside, with camels and flocks and roadside wells and the joyous shout of the peasant at vintage or in harvest — this literature, after all that has intervened, is still our great literature, published abroad as no other in the total of man's writing, translated into the world's great languages and many minor ones, and cherished and loved and studied so earnestly as to set it in a class apart.
The martial language of armor, breastplates, shields, and helmets disrupts the language of love as if to convey the fierceness of the temptation to fall back into the attitudes and habits associated with the old way of life (6:6 - 18).
@John And while you presumably can say «I love you» in every language and have it mean more or less the same, you DO N'T say «if you don't believe as I do, the loving god will subject you to eternal torment and, oh by the way, gays are an abomination and god doesn't want them to have the same rights that you and I enjoy» in every religion.
And yet, while Brown's most recent work, Love's Body (Random House, Inc., 1966), indicates he is familiar with Barfield's discussions on language as metaphor, Altizer does not seem to see the necessary connection between this concept and Saving the Appearances.
I could be wrong I do believe in a higher power and in love as the universal language (for lack of a better phrase of words, although it might be more universal today to say sex is the universal language) and in this post just now realized I have to change my 100 % enabler label to 99 % based on the higher power belief.
human language has not found the words to express the pleasure, the joy, the surprising awakening to another world, that god exists, that he lives and loves me, the missing part, the answer to all questions with one touch, to see life as it is and as it should be, and to do nothing to have entered into this dimension except to ask, to beg, to plead with all one's strength - merely to know him, if he is there.
Accordingly, he correctly points out that the language of intimacy in love as applied to God, the love between father and son, between husband and wife, are basic in Hebraic speech about the love of God for Israel (SFL 19f).
[W] e Hindus are bound together not only by the ties of love we bear to a common fatherland and by the common blood that courses through our veins and keeps our hearts throbbing and our affections warm, but also by the ties of common homage we pay to our great civilization — our Hindu culture, which could not be better rendered than by the word Sanskriti suggestive as it is of that language Sanskrit, which has been the chosen means of expression and preservation of that culture.
I feel like I tested «Love as a universal language» and «the body does not lie» and bless you is okay.
If we already presuppose, then, that the theistic religious language employed by the Christian witness in authorizing faith in God's love as our authentic self - understanding can be metaphysically justified, we can say — as I, in fact, have already been saying — that ultimate reality includes not only the self and others but also the encompassing whole of reality that theists refer to when they use the name «God.»
This position helps to uncover one aspect of the confusion in much popular language about love which treats it as a universal experience which is merely illustrated in particular cases.
’15 When he turns to religious language, Miles describes a believer as a person who accepts «the «theistic» parable — the parable of a loving father who has called us all to be like him and to become his children».
She was born in this country, speaks English as her first language, loves football, holds a British passport and was christened in a church.»
As a self - proclaimed persecuted minority, the sexual revolutionaries enjoy the greatest unchecked privilege of our time, that of identity victimhood, with a monopoly on the positive language of love and freedom.
Perhaps this is what Rilke meant when he wrote in «Letters to a Young Poet,» ``... Have patience with everything unresolved in your heart and to try to love the questions themselves as if they were locked rooms or books written in a very foreign language.
So I find myself second - guessing the «leaving evangelicalism» language, not because it's an inaccurate representation of what I'm experiencing, but because I don't want anyone to think for a moment that this means walking away from the many, many people who identify as evangelical whom I love and respect very much.
The mystic finds no language so well suited to express symbolically the relationship of his own soul to that of God as the language of love, and here he finds it superbly used.
You are most definitely talking my language here as I love all things shrimp and a bit of heat as well.
We had an amazing time as a family spending quality time together (quality time is totally my love language so this was especially wonderful for me!)
I have always loved to cook and bake and a year spent in Italy and France as part of my modern languages degree, tasting the world's finest patisserie, inspired me to enrol at Westminster Kingsway College, London, on the Professional Patisserie Scholarship.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z