Sentences with phrase «love life rule»

Not exact matches

[14:18] Rules of the game to succeed, but not for fulfillment [14:40] God loves diversity; same is true with people — different sources of fulfillment [14:55] Success without fulfillment is the ultimate failure [16:53] We all have something different as our inner desire, you need to find what fulfills you [17:05] A cautionary tale: Robin Williams, the loss of a national treasure [18:42] He lit everybody up, except himself [19:15] Most of us live a life where we succeed but we're not truly fulfilled [20:10] Richard: Tony, what is your method for happiness?

Live by your atheist rules and start explaining to your loved ones the lack of metaphysical or spiritual definition to your love.

Live life and just follow one simple rule: be good, kind, and loving to all you meet.

You can theorize all day long that we have other rules and laws... but for my moral guide in this life... Jesus principle of love will do just fine.

The rule of life for the Christian is to love God above all things and to love our neighbour as ourselves.

We encourage Christians in America to look to the persecuted church for an example of steadfast courage and radical love — and to reject the temptation to allow fear to rule our lives.

Justice is the «alien» or «left - hand» rule of God through temporal powers, while love is the «proper» or «right - hand» rule of God through the Church and the gospel she proclaims and lives.

while the writer has little knowledge of the bible, he is also greatly lacking what he should know to write such a article, the laws give to people of all walks of life is the commandments given by moses, religion does not have anything to do with goverments laws or rulings, he told us straight the one law that there is no forgiveness for is murder, rulers and goverments take it upon themselves to make the decision whether to go to war, or if a person should be put to death, as far as jesus and the apostles are concerned thier labours was a work of love and true humanitarian towards all peoples, races, religions, they never asked for anything for themselves, and they never took from one to give to another.

I know for a fact that despite all my talking and writing about love, there are many area of my life not ruled by love.

Any truth to be gleaned from the bible will be done by studying the prevailing themes like love, charity, and the golden rule and applying them to our God given consciences and living well.

Paul speaks of the new life in the freedom of love as being itself the «rule» (canon).

Yet, the verse begins, «Let us make man in our image, after our likeness...» Human rule of the animal creation and the natural world should mirror what I believe to be God's loving care for all life.

There is a skill and diplomacy to know how to put aside the cultural expectations and still live out Christ's love and generosity much like the father in the story of the prodigal son - both sons and the father knew the cultural rules, but when it came down to it, the father, who had much to lose, put aside those cultural burdens in order to love lavishly.

And being good meant trying to live in accord with the ethical teaching of scripture, whether that was understood as a narrow and highly specific code of righteousness, or more generally as following important principles such as the golden rule, loving your neighbor as yourself, and so forth.

This is another one of those rules that somebody must have dreamed up in a rage of vengeance: a schoolmaster named Ichabod, disappointed in love, glowering down on his young charges, and thinking, «Yes, I shall make their lives miserable!

It is this type of capricious handling of the Bible that helped me to realize that the institutional church that loves its Rules and Expectations must «burst apart», in order for mercy to finally be lived.

To rule out such praying would rule out large areas of life so vital to us that they must have a vital place in the concern of a loving God.

A personalistic philosophy of life does not offer us absolute knowledge;... we discover divine purpose in so far as our human purposes are ruled by the New Testament principles of logos and agape - reason and love.

@Roger Bolero «societies ruled by athiests have no concept of love or justice, just a will to power and disregard for human life and rights.»

In his new book, The New Rules for Love, Sex & Dating Stanley talks about why, in order to find the person we're going to spend the rest of our lives with, we should focus on being the person that our future spouse is looking for, as well.

What the New Testament does do is to portray the gracious message of an open access to that same God whose depth of accepting love is seen on a cross and whose presence in the life of that crucified one is designed to call forth from us the same awe, reverence, and obedience to those rules of life through which we find the fullness of life, the depth of love, and the meaning of our own humanity.

Neville i mentioned those people only because the discussion was talking about dominionism the combination of the church and state as a governing rule all those people were government leaders all of them suffered in there own way.Its was the suffering that prepared them for the roles that they were to play and there faith in God was what helped them get through.We are made stronger in our weakness no matter how important or unimportant we may appear to others.I guess it is easy to fall into the lie about political involvement that its hard to make change but some people have had a huge impact.Really it is God who deserves the praise he is the one that creats the opportunitys to make impact on the world as in our strength we can do nothing.In hebrews the great men and woman of faith there are those that seemed unimportant to the world and many suffered for there faith Our Lord knows everyone by name and every small act of faith we do he remembers because we do it out of our love for him that is what the christian walk is about living for Jesus and sharing that love with others.brentnz.

It's that living under law thing that kills us (the Spirit gives life but the letter kills), trying to live up to standards and rules, principles and guidelines, etc... The church these days has pretty much no idea what grace even is, and if you start talking about God's love, I mean his real love based only on Christ's merit, people call you a heretic.

Forty - eight percent of Lutherans «agree» or «probably agree» that «people can only be justified before God by loving others,» and 60 percent agree that «the main emphasis of the gospel is God's rules for right living.»

From them we glean what has previously been indicated as basic notes in the understanding of the kingdom: the timeless kingship, or kingly rule, of God; an ongoing and present kingdom to be entered and lived in by accepting God's sovereign rule in obedient response; and a final victory of God which is in God's hands, though he calls us to labor in faith and love for its coming.

When we love God and love others, we are living those laws (rules).

Yet there is no adequate substitute for the New Testament understanding of God as both Creator and Redeemer, ruling his world in both power and love, offering to mankind both judgment and mercy, and affording a ground of security and hope for both present and future, for this world and for an ongoing life after death.

Love your thoughts, but until ignorance is no longer bliss you can expect those who back their good thoughts and feelings with fantasy rather than the realities we are confronted wth every day to rule our lives.

If our theology causes us to bind heavy burdens on people's backs, while creating rules, restrictions, and regulations for how to live life with God and others, and we stifle people's joy, censor their love, and chide them for their grace, it is no wonder that people reject us and our theology, and maybe the God we claim to follow as well.

This Golden Rule is identical to John Galt's proclamation (paraphrased): I swear by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for another person, NOR EXPECT ANOTHER PERSON TO LIVE FORlive for another person, NOR EXPECT ANOTHER PERSON TO LIVE FORLIVE FOR ME.

We lack a belief that we can live by these rules without losing the love and care for one another that help us lead fully human lives.

Ironically, these two men are often caricatured as promoting a religion of wild emotional excess, when in fact they took pains to insist that a life of love and joy does not rule out reasoned reflection or active social involvement.

Those who were no people — slaves in Egypt — but who now have been made into a special people, embraced by love, they are to live out a new humanity that is not ruled by envy, jealousy, or hostility.

Even in gay loving relationships which by the way are a mere quarter of 1 percent of the US people are we giving in and changing the definition of marriage for all and allowing these who define marriage by their own rules and ways rather than saying you need to live up to this standard.

Are we afraid of bearing the responsibility of living a life loved, living a life connected to the vine, seeking him first rather than our rules or our expectations?

At that instant of time when I gave all up to him to do with me as he pleased, and was willing that God should rule over me at his pleasure, redeeming love broke into my soul with repeated scriptures, with such power that my whole soul seemed to be melted down with love; the burden of guilt and condemnation was gone, darkness was expelled, my heart humbled and filled with gratitude, and my whole soul, that was a few minutes ago groaning under mountains of death, and crying to an unknown God for help, was now filled with immortal love, soaring on the wings of faith, freed from the chains of death and darkness, and crying out, My Lord and my God; thou art my rock and my fortress, my shield and my high tower, my life, my joy, my present and my everlasting portion.

The kind of ethic promoted here by Paul is one which stresses liberation from the law — from those rules which prevent the maintenance of a loving community and for a freedom which accommodates differences between a people called to share in faith and life.

Schweitzer's radical demonstration of love in the form of unpretentious human service, under conditions which involve personal renunciation, corresponds directly to St. Francis's rule of love and humility as the authentic foundation of a way of life free from attachments of privilege and power.

While Jesus» name won't appear on the ballot this fall, I imagine that every time I care for the poor, attempt to live more simply, turn the other cheek, and love my enemies, I'm casting a vote for Jesus, who will one day return to rule His Kingdom in person.

When we actually love God and live according to His rules rather than our man - made ones, something happens that is amazing.

I love this rule, which has guided my life and thought for as long as I've known it, and I think of it as the central Protestant proposal to the Church catholic.

Living by the rule of Leviticus 19, we point to a God whose justice is ruled by love, who makes provision for the poor and will not allow the disabled to be disadvantaged.

You know, we who CHOOSE to believe in REALITY and who choose a morality based upon HUMAN love, compassion, mindful awareness, and LOGIC as opposed to a salvation - based transactional morality - exchange entered into with a petty, arrogant, childish, vengeful, MYTHOLOGICAL «Sky Father» in the hopes that, should we live a «good» life according to «His» contradictory, hypocritical, and inconsistent «rules» (or Commandments, or whatever you enjoy calling them) or else spend «Eternity» burning in everlasting torment in «Hell» you know, because «God» loves us so much.

If you are being bullied or abused in the name of religion, if you suffer the heavy yoke of legalistic rules and authoritarian church leadership, Jesus is calling you out of that life and into a new one, where the fruit of the Spirit isn't coercion or fear, but rather love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self - control.

Love is simply this, that one no longer sits, like the spider, in the midst of its web, or like the King Ego upon his throne, demanding service, but that one instead of living for himself, lives for others, instead of ruling, serves.

They want both wentz and elliot, jerry falls in love with qbs and after his son over ruled him on jonny football who jerry cried about not getting; the possibility could be there for him to say go get him... last year was a disaster for the cowboys without romo and jerry does nt have alot of life left so who knows what that old coock will be willing to do if he thinks its the one piece from him getting a super bowl before he dies... although just a mock so who knows

I am sorry that i can not follow Bertrand intellectual rule, since everyone lives on their own beliefs attached to the facts and being an AFC reader and Arsenal supporter, i always love to be part of the emotions without any hatred, following the moral rule.

When labels are applied to anything as complex as all of the choices and love and anguish that go into being a parent, that role is immediately trivialized and for some frightening reason parenting is converting into following a set of rules (or «principles») rather than living in the moment, responding to your child and doing the best you can with what you've got.

Just imagine how nice life will be for you and your loved ones when you can wake up without food fears and rigid food rules?

Inspirational Coffee Breaks For Women by Julie Clark Not rated yet Inspirational Coffee Breaks for Women: 12 Ground Rules for Pouring Your Heart Into Life I just love Julie's coffee analogy, and...