okay, literally in
love with the pointed sleeve hems — so unique!
In
love with pointed - toe black pumps with studded detailing.
These Kendall & Kylie beauties were on for $ 150 off normal retail and I was too in
love with the pointed toe and cool almost wedge like heel to pass them up!
I am so in
love with pointed toe green pumps:
Elf printed black pullover is worn with black dusted jeans and mustard double - breasted hooded wool coat, in
love with these pointed - toe red pumps:
I am in
love with pointed - toe heels:
Not exact matches
Amid the toughest stretch of the Cavs» season in which the team has lost five of their last six games, blame has reportedly been passed around the locker room,
with players
pointing fingers at each other, the coaching staff, Cavs ownership, and most recently, Kevin
Love.
A video reviewer
with BaldBabyLife called it a great choice for the person «who
loves hiking» and
pointed out the «comfortable mesh straps» that help distribute the weight of the loaded backpack.
Realizing that, it's possible that Silicon Valley employees will forgo their
love of Bernie at some
point and get ready to do battle
with The Donald.
Consumers developed a
love - hate relationship
with a brand whose product they were addicted to but whose price
point could seem ludicrous.
Reality is over here (
points to opposite corner of the room) running around in circles, and you're too busy falling in
love with this fictitious notion of what you think your customer behavior is.
Asked if he fell in
love «at some
point»
with Herzer — who declined his offer of marriage in 2000, a few months after they began dating — Redstone answered «yes.»
That one comment seemingly ended the market's
love affair
with growth stocks, sending shares down 13
points in two weeks and another 6 % today.
But Xiaomi lacks relationships
with American carriers and the country's Apple -
loving customer base, so roiling trade tension
with China is bad news for a phone company whose mascot is a bunny wearing a hat
with a red, five -
pointed Communist star.
It keep us from losing touch
with the whole
point of this — to live the life we want, doing what we
love,
with other passionate people.
Even if the actual
points to take out of it are well hidden, it is inspirational stuff and shows
with the right amount of application, enthusiasm and dedication for the task (plus, I reckon, a hell of a lot of luck) you can make this investing thing we
love into a paying career.
If you're a human, then you probably like coffee, but Alaethea doesn't just like coffee... just
loves coffee, to the
point that she researches it, experiments
with different home - brewing mechanisms, and knows all the best coffee shops in all the best cities.
God isn't a child
with a magnifying glass
pointed at an ant farm, he's a genius teacher who
loves to see the moments of «eureka» when we finally understand a part of his work.
Even if one can't agree
with my perspective above... unless the homosexual is going to harm you or your
loved ones... what is the
point in rejection?
Ideally, our experiences
with our father should
point us to the heart of a greater Father who
loves us more than any earthly father ever could.
More to the
point, it was apparent that here was the lecturer's intellectual and even spiritual milieu; for all his sometimes
pointed critique, he was at home
with and indeed
loved these thinkers.
In fact I would
love to have a conversation
with an atheist just to understand their
point of view.
Sometimes we get so bogged down
with what we are suposed to do as a Christian and really it comes down to
loving our brother as Jesus
loved us and as you
pointed out in Matthew 28 to tell someone about it.
Caitlin Flanagan,
with her «I'm so put upon because I work and keep house, but marriage is better for the children» thinking, and Sandra Tsing Loh,
with her «Don't bother, you'll only get burned» bitterness, have (not surprisingly) missed the
point that unsterilized marriage is a great adventure, one that opens your horizons to
love beyond self - satisfaction.
This is the central
point of man that is different than animal as we were gifted
with capacity to worship God (worship is closely connected
with the emotive expressions of
love).
Again and again, Charles hammered home the
point that it is not necessary to oppose gay civil rights on Christian principle; but it is necessary to show
love and acceptance, because the church has the responsibility of welcoming and sharing the good news of Jesus Christ
with all people.
You can
point out the sin without being judgmental, you can
love the sinner but you can not agree
with societal changes in ordr to be popular
with culture... just to get people in church.
I do however attack the so called good god
with his
loving morality, as a way to
point out to believers that they are in fact looking up to an absolute tyrant.
They use the
love of a Christian trying to
point out sin and trying to
point to Jesus and eternal life
with God as being unlovely or judgemental.
She insists on an essentially theological view of the world as the only appropriate starting
point for effective radical politics — the only way to maintain a right understanding of what we are about and to avoid partisanship in our efforts to do justice,
love mercy and walk humbly
with God.
In the book, I make a brief but impassioned case for reading the text
with the prejudice of
love, a hermeneutic I believe was employed by Jesus, and, as many reviewers have
pointed out, a hermeneutic that Augustine also favored.
I once spoke
with a young woman who was raised in a very liberal mainline tradition who told me she left the church because, «I wasn't learning anything there about tolerance,
love, and good stewardship of the planet that I wasn't learning at my public high school, so what was the
point?»
If Jesus embodies God's dreams for the world, then citizens of the Kingdom start by imitating him — by eating
with the people he ate
with, by telling the sort of stories he told, by healing and forgiving, by serving and praying, by resisting the temptations of power and money and violence, by breaking down religious barriers, by
loving enemies, by showing humility and grace, by overturning some tables and dining at others, by being obedient to the
point of death.
what I appreciate about David's cartoons, is that he'll go on for awhile exposing the flaws in some of our churches, right up to the
point where I almost don't want to hear any more and then * KABOOM * he hits us
with the
love and grace of God.
When people aren't dealing
with planks in their own eyes, and are
pointing out the specks in the eyes of others, they aren't really learning to
love themselves because they don't make time to nurture and nourish themselves.
Otherwise, however, we must conclude at this
point that to speak of God as determining worldly events, as constantly or occasionally going «zap» into our normal processes, is consistent neither
with our common sense nor
with our Christian faith in a
loving God.
The
point here is that when Jesus returns to set right all wrongs, to heal all hurts, and to restore all that is crooked, He comes
with healing,
love, and righteousness, calling all people to Himself to be redeemed and renewed.
Some of the
points raised by the numbered critique are excellent, but true the tone becomes less useful and condescending
with some of the
points (and I
love that Hayward raises the
point that this is no doubt the way the author feels he has been treated).
Duffy makes a
point of reminding us that he is a «cradle» Catholic, raised in what many consider the narrow, provincial, and oppressive world of Irish Catholicism, where the phrase «God is
love» was «thumped into you
with a stick and the penny catechism.»
This is an important
point, for, while we have often taught what is wrong
with homosexuality, why it is a disorder and that «gay sex» is always morally wrong - we have been less effective at proposing the whole, positive vision of sex and
love, and also what paths to fulfilment are open to people who experience same - sex attraction.
It must be further
pointed out that De Rougemont takes the most elaborately dramatized and perverse examples of romanticism such as the Tristan legend
with its turgid morbidities, its pathos, and its obsession
with adultery, and treats this as the essence of romantic
love.
Not by chance, Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, General Secretary of the Synod of Bishops, underscored in an interview
with the Italian weekly magazine La Settimana that the strong
points of the last Synod of Bishops were the doctrinal framework, the Gospel of the Family, and the push for young people to receive an education about
love.
What especially struck me was that Richard, by then a controversial figure who had criticized the World Council of Churches and who had denounced the abortion right created by Roe v. Wade,
loved debate and encouraged thinkers
with diverse
points of view to gather together.
With that in mind, at some
point, you might need to say, «Hey Aunt Jane, you know how you really
love John MacArthur and Albert Mohler on the radio?
Therefore, the fetus does not merely tend toward its own maturation, but rather, in order to achieve maturation, in the fullest sense of the term, it has to have an «other,» in this case, the parents, as
point of convergence, as principle of unification and integration, as revealer to the child of what it is; and to the degree that the child learns to
love with the aid of his parents, to that degree he is differentiated and thus revealed to himself for what he is.
As she continues to read, we hear about Paul's incarceration and persecution, about how Jesus is «the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation,» about watching out for all those false teachings that circulated through the trade routes, about how we ought to stop judging each other over differences of opinion regarding religious festivals and food (I blush a little at this
point and resolved to make peace
with some rather opinionated friends before the next sacred meal), about how we should clothe ourselves
with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, and
love, about how we must forgive one another, about how the things that once separated Jew from Greek and slave from free are broken down at the foot of the cross, about how we should sing more hymns.
«In modern society we
love to
point out that Jesus ate
with tax collectors and prostitutes.
But we should not quarrel over
points where it would be possible
with moderation and
love and the help of a few principles to reach agreement or peaceably concede to each other the right to a different choice and decision.
Each
point in the statement must bleed
with love.
So, I guess I am wondering... as you obviously disagree
with Jeremy on this doctrinal
point, does that mean you get a pass on
loving him?