Sentences with phrase «low cu»

Genotypes of HTR1B SNP rs11568817 (χ2 (2, N = 133) = 11.63, p = 0.003) and HTR2A SNP rs6314 (χ2 (1, N = 133) = 7.88, p = 0.005) were found to differ significantly in frequency between the high and low CU groups.

Chi - square tests were conducted to compare frequencies of genotypes of all 15 SNPs between the high and low CU groups.

In a recent publication exploring developmental trajectories of CU traits, youth with persisting high CU traits had experienced more maternal harshness, low parental knowledge, and monitoring compared to the moderate or low CU youth groups [64].

More specifically, harshness increased significantly across groups from low to high CU traits, and youth with low CU traits reported higher parental warmth, but there were no differences between the warmth reported by high compared to moderated groups.

Since one interaction parameter CU × ODD achieved significant results (social cognition, p =.05), single effects were estimated and interpreted (for children with ODD = absent, ODD = present, low CU score - percentile 25 of the distribution - and high CU score - percentile 75): high CU raw scores were associated with high scores in social cognition difficulties at age 4, but only for children without ODD at age 3.

Genotypes of HTR1B rs11568817 were found to be significantly differently distributed in high versus low CU groups.

Considering that, relative to their low CU peers, conduct - problem children high on CU traits do not appear to be deficient in expressing emotional language with their caregivers [29], mothers» disregard for emotions might not be impairing their willingness to openly discuss feelings in the family.

According to a panel of child psychologists, their emotional displays were not judged to be less genuine than those shown by their low CU peers.

However, these previous results also report divergent findings, that range from attentional avoidance (see Hodsoll et al., 2014, who found that boys aged 8 — 16 with clinical levels of conduct problems and high levels of CU showed reduced attentional capture by angry faces) to attentional orientation toward angry faces (see Ezpeleta et al., 2017b, who showed that children with high but non-clinical levels of CU traits and ODD - related problems oriented their attention to angry faces to the same degree as children with low CU traits and low ODD - related problems, during an emotional version of the Go / No - Go task).

Although overall the sample showed improvement on representations of family dysfunction over time, analyses revealed that this effect was largely driven by the high CU traits group, while the low CU group remained relatively stable.

As affective relationship quality is especially important to behavioural change in children with high CU traits, an association between change in warmth in the pictures and child outcome would be moderated by levels of CU traits, such that more warmth would be more strongly related to positive outcomes in the child for children with high CU traits compared to those with low CU traits (hypothesis c).

Reduced emotional distance (i.e., increased warmth) within the family pictures was more strongly related to reduced conduct problems in high CU compared to low CU children, further adding support to the notion that parental warmth is of unique importance to the development of children with CU traits (hypothesis c).

Similarly, equivalence of the high and low CU groups was tested by performing analyses of variance on key variables (e.g., child adjustment, number of treatment sessions).

The analyses were conducted with the sample split into high and low CU groups.

Children with high levels of CU, however, demonstrated greater change in FDP dysfunction than a low CU group, resulting in similar levels at follow - up.

Participants were divided into two groups of high and low CU traits using the standard cut - off by Dadds et al. (2014), classifying children as high in CU traits if their score was 8 or greater.

This group also showed significantly more change on several aspects of family dysfunction (family pride, emotional distance, parental team, tension and anger), in comparison to the low CU group.

Inspecting the standardized regression coefficients revealed that the relationships were of opposite direction: for the high CU group, change in Emotional Distance was negatively related to the outcome (β = −.31), while it was a positive association for the low CU group (β =.24).

The standardized regression coefficients revealed that an improvement in family dysfunction scores was significantly related to outcome for the high CU traits group (β = −.42) but not the low CU group (β =.04).

When the Time × CU traits interaction effects were considered separately, significant differences were observed for the Family Pride, Emotional Distance, and Tension / Anger, scales (p <.05), suggesting that the high and low CU groups showed different responses across time on these scales.

CU traits also moderated the association between change in family warmth and conduct problem severity, with increased FDP warmth more strongly related to improved conduct problems in the high vs. the low CU group.

An inspection of the mean plots (see Fig. 2) indicated that the differences in scores over time for the low CU group was smaller than the differences in scores over time for the high CU group, suggesting that the high CU group demonstrated more change (i.e., improvement) on these scales with treatment.

Thus, more improvement in Emotional Distance was associated with less conduct problems after the intervention for the high CU group, and vice versa for the low CU group.

Not exact matches

After 2 hours of a low simmer I thought it was a little thick and had reduced to what I thought was not enough servings so I added another 1.5 cu of stock and.5 tbsp of masa.

The RDA in North America for Cu is.9 mg = 900mcg, quite low, and zinc 16 mg for men at my age.

Longer, lower, and wider than its predecessor, a 1.2 - inch wheelbase stretch results in 3.7 cu ft of extra space inside, 2 inches more legroom in the rear seat, and 2.6 cubic feet more trunk space.

There are 38.2 cubic - feet of cargo space behind the rear seats and that more than doubles to 80.3 cu - ft (same as the GLE400) when the rear seatbacks are lowered.

The trunk's wide opening and reasonably low bumper make it easy to pile in our gear, and we make the most of the 12 cu ft of space.

There is 122 cu ft of space in total and a low, flat floor that can accommodate a 40» x 48 `' pallet.

From what we can see in photos, it seems like the cargo floor has been lowered to bring the Juke's cargo capacity behind the seats up to Nissan's claimed 12.5 cu - ft of cargo space.

ft. (regular wheelbase and low roof) to over 487 cu.

Mercedes - Benz explains, «The Mercedes GLE lineup provides comfortable seating for five and also offers generous carrying capacity, with 38.2 cu - ft of cargo space behind the rear seats and 80.3 cu - ft with the rear seatbacks lowered.

: 95.5 x 92 Valvetrain: DOHC, silent chain, two - stage, four valves per cylinder Aspiration: Natural Mfg.'s hp @ rpm: 265 @ 5,600 Mfg.'s torque (lb - ft) @ rpm: 284 @ 4,000 Transmission: Five - speed Automatic Ratios -LRB-: 1) First 3.842 Second 2.353 Third 1.529 Fourth 1.000 Fifth 0.839 Rev 2.765 Transfer case: TX - 10 part - time two - speed Crawl ratio: 32:1 Low - range ratio: 2.625:1 Axle ratio: 3.133:1 Suspension (f / r): Independent, coilover shock / solid axle, leaf sprung Steering: Power - assisted rack - and - pinion Brakes (f / r): Vented disc / solid disc Wheels / Tires: 16x7 Aluminum / P265 / 75R16 BFG Rugged Trail T / A Wheelbase (in): 106.7 Length (in): 178.7 Width (in): 72.8 Height (in): 74.9 Curb weight (lb): 4,402 Ground clearance (in): 9.5 Approach (deg): 33.2 Departure (deg): 29.4 Max towing capacity (lb): 5,000 Interior cargo capacity (seats up / down cu.

in total - Door stowage areas (front and rear, upper and lower)-- 891 cu.

and lower (67.1 cu.

QUICK SPECS Vehicle / model: ’14 Jeep Cherokee Base price: $ 29,495 (Trailhawk) Engine (s): 2.4 - liter Tigershark I - 4, 3.2 - liter Pentastar V - 6 Rated hp / torque (lb - ft): 184/171 (2.4 - liter), 271/239 (3.2 - liter) Transmission: ZF 948TE 9 - spd Transfer case: N / A 4WD system (s): Full - time w / active on - demand clutch, selectable rear locker w / Active Drive Lock Low - range ratio: 2.92:1 Frame type: Steel uniframe Suspension, f / r: McPherson strut, long - travel coil springs, one - piece aluminum subframe, aluminum lower control arms, stabilizer bar / Four - link w / trailing arm, aluminum lateral links, isolated steel cradle, coil springs, stabilizer bar Axles, f / r: 10.4 - in, two - spd PTU / 9.7 - in two - spd RDM w / selectable electronic locker Axle ratio (s): 4.083:1 (2.4 - liter), 3.517:1 (3.2 - liter w / trailer tow) Max crawl ratio (s): 56:1 (2.4 - liter), 47.8:1 (3.2 - liter) Steering: Electric - power, rack - and - pinion Brakes, f / r: 13x1.1 - in vented disc, twin - piston floating caliper / 12.6 x0.47 - in solid disc, single - piston floating caliper disc Wheels (in): 17x7.5 Tires: P245 / 65R17 Firestone Destination A / T Wheelbase (in): 107 Length (in): 182 Height (in): 67.8 Base curb weight (lb): 4,106 Approach / departure angles (deg): 29.9 / 22.9 Minimum ground clearance (in): 8.7 Payload (lb): 1,000 Interior cargo volume (cu ft): 49.47 Max towing capacity (lb): 4,500 Fuel capacity (gal): 15.9 Fuel economy (mpg): TBD

Compared to any other vehicle in the subcompact class, the five - passenger Fit provides the lowest, flattest cargo floor and the most cargo volume of 57.3 cu - ft.

We sell trailer at the lowest possible prices and will meet or beat any price from a local or regional competitor.This 2019 Genesis Supreme Vortex 2815V has the following options: Living Room Slide out, Bedroom vanity slide out, 8 Cu Ft Fridge, Opposing rear power dinette, 32 inch Tv,

Cargo volume is generous for the segment, at 434 liters (15.3 cu - ft), but the low floor and wide lip makes loading heavier items a pain in the back — literally, that is.

The 258 cu in (4.2 L) I6 was redesigned and made 90 pounds (41 kg) lighter, as well as smoother, higher low - end torque, more economical, and requiring less maintenance.

, [39] and the standard 232 cu in (3.8 L) I6, with a single - barrel carburetor and optimized for low emissions (all vehicles at the time carried emissions - reducing devices, including exhaust gas recirculation); was relatively low - powered («The Pacer comes with either of two AMC inline six - cylinder engines, both producing 100 bhp, but the larger 258 - cu - in.

This is a big car, with a generous, 782 - litre boot capacity (27.6 cu ft, to lower window), and with enough storage spaces throughout the interior.

Shoot, the Sport is less than $ 22k to start, and it has 22 cu ft of trunk space with the seat up... the LX has even more space, with a lower level sound system.

The GT comes with a 361 hp (269 kW)[15] 6.0 L (364 cu in) Generation IV V8, [13] featuring a 6 - speed 6L80 automatic and Active Fuel Management, capable of reaching 60 mph (97 km / h) in 5.2 seconds, [16] with quarter - mile times as low as 13.4 seconds.

ft. with the 60:40 split rear seatbacks lowered, a gain of 1.4 cu.

Vehicle / model: 2008 Dodge Dakota TRX4 Base price: $ 30,390 Engine: 4.7 L SOHC 16 - valve SMPI V - 8 Max hp & torque (lb - ft): 302/329 Transmission (s): 5 - 45RFE five - speed automatic Transfer case (s): NV233HD (part time), NV244HD (full - time) Low range ratio: 2.72:1 Frame type: Ladder Suspension f / r: Independent, upper and lower A-arms, coil springs over gas - pressure shock absorbers, link - type stabilizer bar / Live axle, multileaf two - stage longitudinal springs, staggered gas - pressure shock absorbers Ring - and - pinion: 3.92:1 Max crawl ratio: 32:1 Steering: Power rack - and - pinion Brakes f / r: 12.3 x1.1 vented rotor, dual - piston sliding caliper / 11.6 x2.28 drum Wheels: 16x8 aluminum Tires: P265 / 70R16 OWL Rugged Trail Wheelbase (in): 131.3 Length (in): 218.5 Height (in): 68.7 Base curb weight (lb): 4,782 Approach / departure angles (deg): 21.9 / 22.6 Minimum ground clearance (in): 7.9 GVWR (lb): 6,010 Max cargo volume (cu.

As noted at the top, the Alltrack can just fit about anywhere a CUV can, but with a lower silhouette — yet with a competitive 30.4 cu ft of cargo space behind the second row seat that grows to 66.5 cu ft with the seat folded.

The profile not only looks long and low, but there's now more room inside for people and their stuff: 31.5 cu - ft of cargo space with the rear seats up, more than double what the last Regal sedan offered.

The boot offers 272 liters (to lower window; 9.6 cu ft) of cargo space, which should be enough for your daily shopping, but the regular Golf has 380 liters of cargo space in the boot, so that's something to think about.

Choosing CU student loans are one of the most practical ways to pay for college, simply because credit unions provide lower rates than private providers of student loans.