The broad top - of - the - heap journals have
very low acceptance rates and attempt to publish articles that make conclusions that shift the current paradigm in a field.
Though the Ivies are notoriously tough to get into — their regular - admission acceptance rates range from 5.2 % to 13.96 % — you might be surprised to learn that other schools have
even lower acceptance rates.
HR director Monika Fahlbusch boasts that Salesforce hired merely 4.5 percent of its more than 100,000 applicants last year —
a lower acceptance rate than Harvard's.
Chick - fil - A's impossibly low price tag helps make it accessible, even despite its irregular business model and
low acceptance rates, and it's part of what makes it so successful.
This Christian college in Missouri has
a lower acceptance rate than Cornell, the Ivy with the highest acceptance rate, and requires students to show financial need for admission.
This has
a lower acceptance rate (about 10 %) than any of their other nutty positions (on female clergy, gay marriage etc) and is frighteningly harmful.
They, too, have
low acceptance rates.
Your perception may be due to the journal's
low acceptance rate and / or the large number of people who would read the article.
However, it's inaccurate to say that it is «harder» to become a teacher than a doctor, because the only barrier that's described is
the low acceptance rate for applicants to university teaching programs.
Low achieving students need not apply — Harvard has
the lowest acceptance rate of any U.S. university.
Another reason for
the low acceptance rates may have to do with who AMS members actually are.
That's
a lower acceptance rate than some colleges!
A low acceptance rate at a school is indicative of quality; entrance becomes competitive as they are receiving applications from top students.