Sentences with phrase «low avoidant»

That is, fewer intrusive memories occurred after being primed with an attachment prime but only for participants with low avoidant attachment tendencies.

Participants with low avoidant attachment tendencies who received the attachment primes recalled fewer memories and reported fewer intrusions than those who received the non-attachment primes.

The median spit was 67/68 (low anxious range: 24 — 67; high anxious range: 68 — 107) for ECR - Anxious was 45/46 (low avoidant range: 24 — 45; high avoidant range: 46 — 92) was ECR - Avoidant.

Specifically, participants with low avoidant attachment reported fewer subsequent intrusive memories when an attachment prime was presented relative to a non-attachment prime (p <.05).

Not exact matches

Duration of breastfeeding was not related to the risk of insecure - avoidant or insecure - resistant versus secure attachment classification, but longer duration of breastfeeding predicted a lower risk of disorganized versus secure attachment classification (n = 151; odds ratio [OR] = 0.81, 95 % CI 0.66 to 0.99, p =.04).

They may adopt an «avoidant» style, characterized by low interdependency, self - disclosure and warmth.

Patients participating had low back pain for at least three months and high levels of psychological distress, avoided everyday activities and were known as «fear avoidant.»

People with avoidant personality disorder and dependent personality disorder had a lower likelihood of remission from generalised anxiety disorder (34 % and 14 % lower respectively).

People with avoidant personality disorder had a 41 % lower likelihood of remission from social phobia, but personality disorder did not predict panic disorder remission.

Other specialties are: Overeating, Body Image, Low Self - Esteem, Self - Defeating and / or Sabotaging, Adult Children of Emotionally Abusive and / or Critical Parents, Life Transition issues, Premarital Counseling, Perfectionism / Fear of Failure, Panic Attacks, Avoidant Personality Disorder, Dependent Personality Disorder, and Therapy with Adults and Their Parents and / or Sibling.

Indeed, a German study involving a small sample of grandparents found that individuals with an avoidant attachment had lower scores on both social integration and physical health than secure individuals (Wensauer and Grossmann 1995).

The previously mentioned findings of high rates of avoidance and low rates of security in older samples, if replicated in a larger, population - based study, warrant some concern, given the fact that avoidant attachment is associated with compulsive self - reliance under conditions where it is often not adaptive.

For people low in avoidant attachment (i.e., those with less of a need for emotional distance in relationships), their desire for sex was higher when their partners were more responsive, but for those who are highly avoidant (i.e., those who do express desires to be distant from partners) actually desired sex less as partner responsiveness increased.

Frequencies in low social risk community samples are typically ~ 55 % secure, ~ 15 % avoidant, ~ 10 % resistant and ~ 15 % disorganized.

Contrary to meta - analytic findings of the earlier literature that focused only on the effects of the amount of care provided without adequately controlling for selection effects, the NICHD Study found that a number of features of child care (the amount of child care, age of entry into care, and the quality and stability of child care) were unrelated to the security of infant — mother attachments or to an increased likelihood of avoidant attachments, except when mothers provided less sensitive parenting of their infant.11 For the children who received less sensitive maternal care, extended experience with child care, lower - quality child care, and more changes in child care arrangements were each associated with an increased likelihood of developing an insecure attachment with their mothers.

According to Amir Levine, avoidants tend to end their relationships more frequently, have higher rates of divorce, and score the lowest on every measure of closeness in contrast with the other attachment types.

However both subtypes of the avoidant style did not report higher levels of cognitive avoidance; the level of cognitive avoidance was even very low in the avoidant - cooperative attachment group though these differences have not been significant.

Seven studies on attachment security / disorganization and child maltreatment in families have been reported, and six studies on attachment in institution - reared children using the (modified) Strange Situation procedure to assess attachment.8 In order to examine the impact of child maltreatment on attachment we compare the studies» combined distribution of attachment patterns to the normative low - risk distribution of attachment (N = 2104, derived from the meta - analysis of Van IJzendoorn, Schuengel, & Bakermans - Kranenburg9): insecure - avoidant (A): 15 %, secure (B): 62 %, insecure - resistant (C): 9 %, and disorganized (D): 15 %.

Avoidant - dismissing individuals are characterised by high avoidance and low anxiety.

The avoidant attachment is characterized by low scores on all three subscales.

Persons who displayed more suspicious jealousy had greater insecurity, greater anxious attachment, greater avoidant attachment, greater chronic jealousy, and lower self - esteem.

Median splits were calculated to determine high and low scorers on the ECR anxious attachment and avoidant attachment scales, respectively.

In terms of high and low scorers on avoidant attachment, a 2 (Attachment Condition) x 2 (Anxious Attachment) x 2 (Memory Valence) ANOVA of recall responses indicated a significant main effect for Valence [F (1, 56) = 48.22, p =.04], and a significant Attachment Condition x Anxious Attachment interaction [F (1, 56) = 4.27, p =.000].

To determine the potential impact of being highly avoidant or anxious on the attachment scale (ECR) on the dependent variables, we conducted separate analyses of variance (ANOVA) that factored in high and low scores on the anxious attachment and avoidant attachment dimension, respectively.

The «avoidant part», now called his Ally, was very agreeable to Steve making the calls as long as he would lower the number to 20 contacts a day when he sat down to prospect.