Not exact matches
This is overcome by removing the surplus
electoral vote from the candidate receiving the
lowest portion of the popular
vote.
They also all have only one representative in the US house of representatives (meaning they have a very
low population), but 2 senate
votes and 3
votes in the
electoral college.
However while the
low earner Conservative
vote is now at 1992 levels, it is also true that Cameron's popularity lags behind John Major's at a similar moment in the
electoral cycle in 1992.
Gildernew's claim to the seat rested on a majority of four
votes in 2010 — one of the
lowest winning margins in post-war UK
electoral history.
As such, in elections where a large portion of electorate isn't terribly inspired by either candidates, and mostly
votes for «lesser of two evils» in current FPTP, the two major party candidates just might accrue enough down -
votes that a 3rd party candidate who isn't nearly as disliked will, on balance, win over both of them (or at the very least, acquire more than the abysmal 4 % combined popular
vote and 0
electoral vote like 2016 US presidential elections, despite 3rd party candidates combined likely being preferred by 40 % of electorate, as a
low bound).
These sorts of distortion can be caused by several factors, including tactical
voting (as perhaps in Birmingham),
electoral pacts (as perhaps in North East Lincolnshire), one party piling up
votes in safe seats but losing out in marginals (as in Leeds), or turnout being particularly
low in one party's safe seats (as in Sefton).
On the other hand, Kelly said, opinion polls in the states pummeled by Sandy — Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey — show the president so far ahead that
low turnout is unlikely to shift those states»
electoral votes to Republican challenger Mitt Romney.