Not exact matches
Critics of the program say that large companies abuse H - 1B visas, hiring foreign workers who command
lower salaries than Americans would
doing the same job.
«Applying for H - 1B visas takes so much time that I, as CEO, should be spending
doing other things,» she tells Inc. «It has absolutely hurt my business,» she adds, noting that her costs associated with hiring through the program have shot up some 24 percent, causing her to
lower some
salaries at her 65 - person business.
Good administrators and professional people can be driven out not solely because their
salaries are
lower than they can command elsewhere but also because they may be deprived of the challenge of teaching students and / or
doing some research.
The mid-level to upper - level guys get paid better than most other teams would pay, so whereas other teams have a handful of high - priced players and a lot of
low - priced guys (which results in a top - heavy
salary cap), Belichick
does an excellent job balancing his cap space out to the majority of the roster.
We haven't lost on Sanchez that's not a loss if we didn't sell him last summer for 60m, in fact using him for the past thre and a half years on his realy
low salary it's a saving of at least 20m we bought him for around 35m and part exchanged him with a player that's has a potential of being around 50m if he can perform like he use to for years before sighning for Mo,
total failure... Can you believe Wenger spent 32 millions on 2 average players (Chambers and Welbeck) and is penny pinching when is sbout real class players?What is in his mind?Pay a fortune in
salary for mediocre players live Walcott, Ramsey and Wilshere and have hesitations about increasing Sanchez wages... keeping on books failures like Sanogo... The truth is - I say it for years and years - until the «British core» disapears, we are not going to be succesful.The
low quality of British players is dragging the team back.Last time Arsenal was a powerhouse NONE of the first 11 was British.Wanna see how the British quality looks like in a football team - look no further than national sides of England, Scotland, N Ireland, Wales, even Ireland (not British but same style)- all mediocre teams «able» to be defeated by any team coming to mind.And you are asking about Chambers?He is in the same mold like Wilshere,Walcott,Ox,Ramsey,Gibs,Jenkinson - mediocre overpriced and overpaid players.The world is full with hungry, ambitious and skilled players living in poverty and dreaming of moving to the top at any cost or sacrifice (
did you see the poor house - if you can call that house, looking more like an old tent - in which Alexis Sanchez grew up?Or Suarez?)
What I think Wenger is
doing going for a
lower salary and then selling Jack.
They don't have a lot of contract decisions coming up for their young players, and those
low salaries can subsidize a failure or two.
I think a lot of Arsenal fans feel the same as I
do about Wilsh; it's been fun, but it's time for him to go - or at least if he stays, let him stay at a realistic
salary number that reflects his contributions to the club thus far, and his probably permanently
lower ceiling than the last time he signed a contract.
According to a «confidential» report in Sunday's Sport, Griezmann will accept «a
low salary with high bonuses» so that Barca's wage bill «doesn't balloon».
Honestly, I don't care if a woman have a bigger
salary than mine, I don't care if a woman have a
lower salary than mine, what I'm looking for is a woman not an adulte body with a teenager mind!
When they
did the same thing to BOCES superintendent
salaries it only resulted in those positions being filled by interims (you know, double dippers) for years while they tried to find someone to take the job for that «
low» a
salary, compared to
salaries leading up to it.
«The commission would be required to propose a two - tiered legislative pay schedule that would set one
salary for elected officials who
do not earn any outside income and a
lower salary for those who
do.
His plan would require for the first time a two - tier legislative
salary structure — one amount for lawmakers who don't have outside income and a
lower amount for those who
do.
One idea the panel will develop is coming up with a «two - tiered legislative pay schedule that would set one
salary for elected officials who
do not earn any outside income and a
lower salary for those who
do,» the Cuomo administration said in a news release.
Unlike the 2016 bill, the measure
does not raise
salaries for
lower level legislative aides in district offices.
Cuomo has proposed a pay raise commission that would consider granting members of the Legislature and the executive branch raises, but only if the raises were tied to reforms that include caps on legislator outside income and higher
salaries for lawmakers who don't have other jobs and
lower ones for those who
do.
It would
do so in order to make science careers look as attractive as possible, enticing more young people in hopes of keeping
salaries low, Matloff suggests.
«Having a working spouse in graduate school or as a postdoc can be a tremendous advantage since you're no longer trying to make
do on the single,
low - level
salary,» says Rich, an engineer.
«My
salary is
lower, but I enjoy
doing applied research because there is a greater likelihood [than in pharma] that the products that I work on will make it to market.»
The report
does note that «postdoctoral
salaries are relatively
low» and that «graduate students are sometimes discouraged by a perceived mismatch between education and employment prospects in the academic sector.»
That makes sense, but
do we have to cut the humanities simply because their employment prospects are sparser and average
salaries are
lower than ours?
Many of the early - career scientists working in academe, for example, fail to distinguish between organizations that employ scientists in real jobs paying
salaries commensurate with their skills and programs that «train» more scientists at
low pay, adding to the supply of job - seekers while
doing nothing to create real jobs.
Or
do we choose the gig with the
lower salary and shorter workday?)
In the sense that I couldn't afford to
do a
low budget independent film whose financing was constantly falling apart and therefore we would all have to defer our
salaries and not get paid.
They also feel like what they
do really matters,» she says, «despite very difficult working conditions and very
low salaries.»
Teachers
do earn somewhat
lower salaries than their similarly educated peers, which is partly justified by their more expensive health and retirement benefits.
Teachers who received RIF notices were less likely to hold an advanced degree and their
salaries were approximately $ 15,000
lower than those of teachers who
did not receive layoff notices.
The response to the EdNext question is
lower because we simply asked whether the parent thinks teacher
salaries should increase or not, while AP, in its question stresses «for the work they
do,» a phrasing that is likely to fetch a sympathetic response.
Thus, even if school districts
did succeed in reducing the gap in access to effective teaching with their own personnel policies, they would inevitably have to reduce other services to pay for them, e.g., larger class sizes, or
lower base
salaries.
Researcher Marguerite Roza and others have produced considerable evidence that teachers in schools serving the most - disadvantaged students have
lower average
salaries... [and] there is also evidence that these schools tend to have more teachers with emergency credentials and without regular certification... The problem is that these readily measured attributes of teachers have virtually nothing to
do with teacher effectiveness.»
He criticized
low admissions standards; curriculums that «lack coherence and connections to the work that's actually
done in the field»; clinical programs devoted to mere shadowing of practitioners, whether they are successful or not; «watered - down» dissertations with little connection to practice; and a pervasive race among teachers to acquire credit for leadership courses, and thus boost their
salaries, without any interest in actually assuming positions of greater authority.
Further education reforms will be hampered by
low teacher quality as long as the
salaries of teachers
do not rise to a competitive level — the level that would attract many high - quality applicants.
Dedicated individuals and poor students who
did not anticipate
doing well in business still went into teaching, but
low salaries discouraged many bright and vigorous students.
Some of the countries with the highest efficiency ratings
do not pay the highest
salaries, nor
do they have the
lowest student - teacher ratios.
States will need to develop innovative ways to ensure that highly valued mid-career STEM teachers
do not face two barriers to the classroom:
lower salaries and
lower retirement savings.
Average district per - pupil spending
does not always capture staffing and funding inequities.14 Many districts
do not consider actual teacher
salaries when budgeting for and reporting each school's expenditures, and the highest - poverty schools are often staffed by less - experienced teachers who typically earn
lower salaries.15 Because educator
salaries are, by far, schools» largest budget item, schools serving the poorest children end up spending much less on what matters most for their students» learning.
McKinsey & Co.
did a study (PDF) last year comparing the U.S. to other countries and found that America's average current teacher
salaries — starting around $ 35,000 and topping out at an average of $ 65,000 — were set far too
low to attract and retain top talent.
While teachers pay only 5 percent of their
salaries into the PSRS — far
lower than the 14 percent paid by teachers in the statewide plan — they also pay Social Security payroll taxes, unlike peers in the state retirement system, who
do not participate in Social Security.
According to the account, the Republicans believe «the [Dept. of Education] is trying to reassert federal control by exceeding its authority with a rule that would require state and local spending in
low - income schools receiving Title I funds to be equal or greater than non-Title I schools... and force schools to include teacher
salaries when measuring spending between Title I and non-Title I schools...» At the same time, the story notes that «King is facing pressure from civil rights groups who want to ensure the new education law
does not deprive
low - income students of equal funding.»
Low teaching
salaries do not only affect teachers» disposable income.
I don't think a union supply agency is a bad idea as it already has good contacts so set up costs will be
lower and they will pay more — but they will still have to charge schools for their work (and 15 % of
salary for a permanent worker is about as
low as you can sustainably go).
: The worst student to teacher ratios in the country; near the worst per pupil funding in the US;
low starting
salary schedules that shortchange new teachers so the oldest teachers can be overpaid, though all
do the same work; LIFO policies so that younger teachers are always fired first no matter how good they are and no matter how poor senior teachers are; teacher layoffs expected at every recession, with waves of recessions expected indefinitely; bad funding in the absence of recessions and worse funding in recessions; constant loading with additional requirements and expectations; poor and worsening teacher morale; poor and worsening working conditions; ugly architecturally uninspired facilities and often trashy temporary classrooms; inadequate learning materials, resources and technology; inadequate administrative support with the worst student / administrator ratios in the county; inadequate librarian, psychologist, behavioral specialist, counselor, nurse support due to the worst ratios; inadequate student discipline structures; and much more...
But that doesn't mean that districts are spending equally in all schools: The neediest schools tend to employ teachers with less experience than more affluent schools, and less - experienced teachers earn
lower salaries.
Compression could be
done at the
lower steps at minimal cost given the current teacher distributions within the
salary schedules that I've seen in la county districts (clearly in other states things are sometimes
done differently).
Dawn:
Do you truly believe that you can build a professional teacher corps based on the principle that once you get a few years under your belt and start earning a middle - class
salary that you will be in immediate danger of being laid off because that will allow the hiring of more new and inexperienced teachers to
lower class size?
Do you truly believe that you can build a professional teacher corps based on the principle that once you get a few years under your belt and start earning a middle - class
salary that you will be in immediate danger of being laid off because that will allow the hiring of more new and inexperienced teachers to
lower class size?
They generally want to
do good work on behalf of children, but you
do have to get
salaries in the
lowest - spending states up to something that's at least reasonable to support a middle - class existence.
So Gary - You think its the right thing to
do... to furlough students and continue to increase class sizes so that we can pay old teachers more rather than higher more teachers (reduce class sizes) at a
lower salary schedule?
We find it seemingly impossible to find a magical combination of teachers who are qualified to teach for college credit, want to interact with still - maturing teenagers, and
do this for a
salary considerably
lower than larger districts around us.