«This group of technologies is essential for
low stabilization targets,» Edenhofer said.
Not exact matches
In analyzing the funds set aside to initiate new and improved programs, The Salt Lake Tribune reveals that, in addition to directly
targeted funding (to special needs and
low income students), states are also being individually provided with
stabilization funds.
Instead of raising emission
targets to meet the official UN 2 degree climate
target (that IPCC AR4 connects to the 450ppm
stabilization level — industrialized nations need to reduce their emissions by 25 - 40 % between 1990 en 2020) some Annex1 countries actually
lowered their (intended) reduction
targets for the crucial year of 2020.
Yet they still class it as «
low - carbon» and even refer to bioenergy with carbon - capture and storage (BECCS) as a credible means of removing carbon from the atmosphere which they deem essential to meeting
stabilization targets.
The IPCC has just issued a new summary for policy makers for a forthcoming special report on renewable energy that appears (indirectly and obliquely) to finally admit that we just do not have the technology necessary to achieve
low targets for the
stabilization of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (e.g., something like 450 ppm).