NCLB required that states test students in math and reading each year, that average student performance be publicized for every school, and that schools with persistently
low test scores face an escalating series of sanctions.
Not exact matches
A New York City proposal to diversify middle schools on Manhattan's Upper West Side, by setting aside seats for children with
low test scores, is
facing stiff resistance from parents worried their high - achieving children might lose access to the popular public schools.
In addition, teachers whose students»
test scores are consistently
low; those who have failed to secure their teaching certificates on time; those who haven't had a permanent position for six months or more; those who've
faced department probes leading to substantiated allegations of misconduct; and those granted an extension regarding tenure could also be dismissed.
Mayoral control is commonly proposed as a solution for failing school districts like Syracuse's, which
faces low graduation rates and
test scores.
A proposal to diversify middle schools on the Upper West Side, by setting aside seats for children with
low test scores, is
facing stiff resistance from some parents.
While
lower test scores largely result from more difficult
tests, they fly in the
face of Mayor Bloomberg's constant assertions that everything in our schools was getting better, thanks to his leadership.
Headlines R.I.P. David Carradine A-Team Casting: Bradley Cooper as
Face, Liam Neeson as Hannibal Stephen Sommers Fired After G.I. Joe Gets
Lowest Test Screening
Score Ever?
In the
face of these powerful forces, MI theory has served as a reminder to educators to focus on the strengths and weaknesses of the individual child and has also offered conceptual support for educators seeking to prevent individual students from being stigmatized by a
low score on one of these standardized
tests.
For example, teachers who
score low on the new
test - based teacher evaluation system will not
face any consequences for at least two years.
Teachers in
low - performing schools
faced substantial pressure to raise
test scores, and all teachers
faced the challenge of improving the achievement of their
lowest - performing students.
CPS
faces the challenges of high student poverty and dismal
test scores — though its selective - enrollment schools have posted some of the highest
test scores in Illinois — and the district believes it needs more money to help its
low - income population.
With teachers
facing accountability pressure tied to their students» achievement, they may even be reluctant to leave their classrooms, fearing that any time away from students will decrease time on task and
lower test scores.
Children from
low - income families begin kindergarten with less preparation for school than the children of the affluent, they attend schools which
face greater challenges with fewer resources, and they
score lower on standardized
tests.
She wrote that «since teachers
face pressure to improve
scores and since poverty - stricken students generally underperform on high - stakes
tests, schools serving
low - income students are more likely to implement a style of teaching based on drilling and memorization that leads to little learning.»
«As states
faced NCLB's 100 percent proficiency rate requirement, they just
lowered the bar for what
test score would indicate proficiency,» Fuller explained.
High school graduation rates are at an all - time high at over 80 percent (see Chapter 1: Student Achievement).7 8 9 Research on NCLB's accountability provisions has shown modest effects on school performance, particularly in schools seeking to avoid a first year of missing AYP or in schools
facing the severest penalties.10 Despite this progress, however, high school
test scores are flat, achievement gaps persist, and many
low - performing schools are not improving.