Sentences with phrase «low valuation metrics»

There are some stocks which may appear cheap because they are trading at a low valuation metrics such as PE, price to book value ratio, cash flow ratio etc..

These stocks are often characterized by recently falling stock prices, low valuation metrics and large cash holdings.

Not exact matches

I totally agree with you and with Buffett; nonetheless there's one question, that came to my mind regarding market valuations: Assuming bonds and interest rates go even lower as they are today, at which level (pe ratio or Shiller pe ratio — or whatever metric you'd like to take) would I call the market of today a bubble?

In fact, Celgene and Shire are the only large - cap biopharmas with lower valuations based on this particular metric right now.

One of the great anomalies of investing: The historical long - term outperformance of certain smart beta or factor - based strategies relative to the broader equity market (think choosing stocks based on their valuations, momentum, low volatility or quality metrics such as profitability).

It can place me in the «caricature» camp for value managers, because my valuation metrics are usually lower than most.

We acknowledge Pepsi is expensive on traditional valuation metrics and expect it will remain so, especially in a low yield environment.

In that sense all analysis of stock market based on historical metrics do nt make much sense since composition of stocks is entirely different in different era and as more capital efficient business model evolve and their time to market cycle shrinks stocks likely to command higher valuations and suddenly lower valuations during short period of time like already happening for many technology companies and as influence of technology on overall cost structure of companies increases (for example: robotics replace many of employees cost etc) valuation matrix of most companies likely to get affected dynamically in short duration of time than in the past.

We do not see equity valuation metrics falling back to historical means in an environment where earnings are staging a sustained recovery and long - term rates are low.

The value factor formed on B / P is likely to load on low profitability / junk companies, whereas the aggregate valuation metric may be better at identifying quality and thus may do a better job of predicting the subsequent return.

Thus, traders and investors using aggregate financial accounting numbers to derive superficial financial ratios (e.g. profit margin, return - on - equity) and valuation metrics (e.g. low price - to - earnings, low price - to - book) without understanding the underlying business model, the related - party transactions artificially inflating the aggregate financial numbers and the data generation process in the financial footnotes can be misled.

Deep Value is also a practical guide that reveals little - known valuation metrics that activist investors and other contrarians use to identify attractive, asymmetric investment opportunities with limited downside and enormous upside — undervaluation, large cash holdings, and low payout ratios.

(Note: For the reader's information and convenience, follow this link to a FAST Graphs ™ portfolio review of the complete list of the S&P 500 constituents and key fundamental metrics presented in order of highest total estimated return to lowest based on current valuation and estimates of future growth.

Finally, we examine valuation metrics used to identify the characteristics that typically attract activists — undervaluation, large cash holdings, and low payout ratios.

I totally agree with you and with Buffett; nonetheless there's one question, that came to my mind regarding market valuations: Assuming bonds and interest rates go even lower as they are today, at which level (pe ratio or Shiller pe ratio — or whatever metric you'd like to take) would I call the market of today a bubble?

If a share's genuinely «bad» — say, in terms of excessive debt, poor margins, low return on equity, erratic P&L record, etc. — then logically, those sub-par financial metrics will automatically get incorporated into your stock valuation anyway (in suitably quantitative fashion).

Long - term challenges in its core business segments along with value destroying management are two reasons for these metrics grinding lower but at a certain point, valuation can become rather compelling.

Again, it's uncertain whether investors will push valuation metrics down to the lowest points of their historical ranges.