So while we KNOW there are some freaky women (the bad kind, not the good kind) dating online and
it lowers the value of any women we meet there, the value for a man who is dating online is definitely viewed as far worse.
Not exact matches
A 2012 Credit Suisse Research Institute report evaluated the performance
of 2,360 companies globally over six years and found that companies with one or more
women on boards delivered higher average returns on equity,
lower leverage, better average growth and higher price / book
value multiples.
So besides feeling left out, some
women also realize that the concept
of God as male inevitably supports both the
lower status
of women and a society whose dominant
value is power instead
of love.
Probably not until the polity is more child - and
woman - friendly, not until men and
women are equally
valued — economically and otherwise — not until free or
low - cost quality childcare is universally available, will the ideal
of equality in marriage be other than radical.»
The investigation showed that the BMS
value of Norwegian
women was indeed significantly
lower than that
of Spanish
women, by an average
of 3.7 %.
Despite the study labeling the group that ate 6 %
of their total daily calorie consumption from protein, a «
low - protein» group, and the diet containing a lot fewer protein than the RDA (Recommended Daily Allowance), — averaging at 0.7 grams per kilo
of bodyweight (adults» RDA is 0.8 grams per kilogram
of bodyweight)-- the total
of daily protein consumption, averaging at 48 grams a day, was slightly less than CDC recommendation for men, which is just 55 grams
of protein a day and the
value for
women is even smaller, just 45 grams.
A modern conservative columnist, Kate O'Beirne, writing in the National Review, has questioned the
value of food stamps, school breakfasts and lunches, and the WIC programs (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for
Women, Infants, and Children): «With rates
of excess weight and obesity highest among
low - income households, budget officials should be asking themselves why tens
of billions
of dollars are being spent each year by federal nutrition programs aimed at boosting food consumption by the poor.»
Pay equity deals with the concept that occupations traditionally held by
women often have
lower wages than occupations traditionally held by men, even though the jobs are
of equal
value to a company.
To test whether a males» car affected
women's likelihood
of sharing their digits, the male confederates waited in one
of three cars (high, medium, or
low value) before getting out and approaching the
women.
The Negative profile (bottom panel) was characterized by high
values on two items indicating the perception
of poor treatment («spouse does not treat me well» and «I don't treat spouse well») and
low endorsements
of positive items (with the exception
of «I am willing to listen to spouse» reported by
women).
This cutoff point corresponds to 80th percentile scores for community samples and has a 95 % sensitivity for diagnosing major depressive disorder (MDD) among
low - income
women, although the specificity and positive predictive
value for MDD are
low (70 % and 0.28, respectively).29, 30 The cutoff point
of 16 has been used by many investigators assessing depressive symptoms in a variety
of cohorts, including pregnant
women.28 — 33 When studying depressive symptoms during pregnancy, some investigators chose to use a higher CES - D cutoff point (eg, the 90th percentile) to account for the possibility that symptoms
of normal pregnancy may overlap with symptoms
of depression.9, 18 There is no evidence that this approach is more accurate or preferable to using the cutoff point
of 16, and the use
of higher cutoff points increases specificity but decreases sensitivity for MDD.28 We used a consistent cutoff point
of 16 to define depressive symptoms before and after parturition.
Although the sensitivity
of the CES - D among
low - income
women is high, the positive predictive
value remains
low.30 Data obtained in our study were based on maternal reports, which may be subject to reporting bias; however, there is no reason to suspect differential reporting among the 3 symptom groups.