Not exact matches
Getting on for 14 years old and with 87,000 miles on the clock, it nevertheless seems like a remarkably honest, unmolested example, carrying a predictable ragbag of minor niggles that would be easy to put right: a dodgy sunroof seal that generates a gale of
wind -
noise at speed (alleviated by raising the tilt action of the sunroof an inch or so); an adjustable steering wheel that seems to be stuck in a rather
low - slung position (not a problem for me or, presumably, for Mark as it's his daily driver); and, perhaps unsurprisingly, a slightly tappety tickover.
The turbocharged 4.0 - liter V - 8 is muted
at low revs,
wind noise is minimal (almost nonexistent), and the transmission changes gears without a ripple.
There's hardly a whisper of that usual vacuum - cleaner whine
at low speed from the electric motor, while
wind noise at high speed is minimized by a slippery 0.24 Cd for the bodywork.
There's some road
noise and a rustle of
wind from the mirrors
at higher speeds, but the steering feels just right for high - speed stability and
low - speed effort, and there's a syrupy slickness to every control that makes being a chauffeur seem like quite an appealing change of career.
The R350's aerodynamic design results in
low levels of
wind noise at all speeds.
The engine is quite refined
at lower revs, but tyre
noise and
wind rustle from the large door mirrors are less impressive
at high speeds.
At highway speeds, the cabin is about as quiet as the coupe with the same
low levels of
wind noise.
Door gap seals
at the rear door edges join triple - sealed door openings and
lower door - edge seals in keeping
wind noise from entering the cabin.
You get engine
noise at low speed and tire
noise along with
wind noise at speeds higher than 45 mph.
There's very little
wind and road
noise, but the ride is quite firm
at low speeds.
At speed,
wind turbulence is minimal, and
noise is
low for an open convertible, even with the side windows down.
The ride and the grip are amazing and the
wind and road
noise is
low at speed.
Whatever the mode, road
noise is always well filtered and even
at 120 - plus mph,
wind noise remains very
low.
====== EXPERTS ARE SAYING: Road - and
wind -
noise levels are luxuriously
low, and the ride is never harsh, even with the suspension calibrations
at their sportiest..
Wind and road
noise is present
at highway speeds, but not intrusive; the latter no doubt generated from the HL - spec's
low - profile 17 - inch tyres.
On the highway,
wind noise stays within
low limits but
at times, rough patches of asphalt may force the suspension to react in a noisy manner.
Cruising
at 65 mph, the Escape Hybrid Limited exhibits a great deal of road and
wind noise, no doubt caused by the Escape's boxy shape, reduced sound insulation, and
low - rolling resistance tires.
To realize a quiet cabin environment that enables occupants to enjoy stress - free conversation while driving, particular effort was devoted to reducing
low - frequency road
noise heard when traveling on roads with coarse surfaces, as well as high - frequency
wind and tire
noise heard when traveling
at higher speeds.
The Camry is quieter overall but still presents plenty of
wind and powertrain
noise, and is worse than the Mazda when it comes to steering shock, rack rattle and even axle tramp
at low speeds.
At all times
noise levels are incredibly
low with little road, engine or
wind noise finding their way into the cabin under all but the most extreme, conditions.
NVH levels are quite good when the car is doing
low speeds but the engine gets very audible
at high speeds and there is a lot of
wind noise from the area near the A-pillar.
As the speed increases, ABC also
lowers the vehicle below the static ride height (maxing out
at about 0.5 inch
at about 80 mph) to reduce
wind resistance for better fuel economy and reduced
noise and
lower the center of gravity for better high - speed stability.
The
wind noise is
low even
at a speed of 140 - 160 km / h.
This industry has been well aware of the problems directly caused by
wind turbine noise since 1987, when Dr Neil Kelley's research [12] establishing direct causation of annoyance symptoms from infrasound and low frequency noise was presented at the American Wind Energy Association confere
wind turbine
noise since 1987, when Dr Neil Kelley's research [12] establishing direct causation of annoyance symptoms from infrasound and
low frequency
noise was presented
at the American
Wind Energy Association confere
Wind Energy Association conference.
Professor Hansen's team's research findings have now supported Dr Laurie's statement in 2011 about the distance of impact and are consistent with the residents» consistent reports for nearly four years of a
low frequency
noise problem from the
wind turbines
at Waterloo, which severely disrupts their sleep.
«Picton, Ontario, November 16, 2010 — High levels of
low frequency
noise (LFN) are produced and can be measured
at wind turbine developments according to Richard James INCE, acoustics specialist from Michigan.
«The
noise, especially for people
at all sensitive to infrasound and
low - frequency
noise, would make it unpleasant and even impossible to walk the dog, garden, camp, play, barbecue — anything one expects to enjoy doing on one's own property without hindrance,» said Eric Rosenbloom, president of National
Wind Watch, a Vermont - based group critical of the wind indus
Wind Watch, a Vermont - based group critical of the
wind indus
wind industry.
The consequences of exposure to impulsive infrasound and
low frequency
noise generated by
wind turbines were also clearly well known to the global
wind industry, because of the dramatic change in design which resulted, and because the results were presented
at the AWEA sponsored conference.
He went on to say «It found many people living near
wind turbines
at a
wind farm near Cape Bridgewater in Victoria are suffering health complaints caused by
low - frequency
noise generated by
wind turbines».
However,
at the moment, uncertainty about how factors such as
low wind speeds, high levels of turbulence,
noise, visual impact, and animal strikes influence the performance of micro
wind turbines make it hard to determine their true potential in this form.
In Australia, where the controversy is reaching new heights, a
wind industry executive has been singling out Dr Sarah Laurie in a bid to make the public forget the many other health professionals who alert the public to the dangerous effects of
wind turbines: «[T] he largest public relations issue for the industry
at the moment is the theory of an ex-doctor that infrasound or
low frequency
noise from
wind turbines is likely to make anyone within 10 km of a
wind turbine sick» (2).
Noise events that could be attributed to the wind farm were periodically audible at four locations, but at very low levels, which did not dominate the noise environment; however, no attributable events were found at the two remaining ho
Noise events that could be attributed to the
wind farm were periodically audible
at four locations, but
at very
low levels, which did not dominate the
noise environment; however, no attributable events were found at the two remaining ho
noise environment; however, no attributable events were found
at the two remaining houses.
People exposed to infrasound and
low - frequency
noise in a laboratory (
at much higher levels than those to which people living near
wind farms are exposed) experience few, if any, effects on body functioning.
«75... the Tribunals did not have before them expert evidence which seriously called into question the principle underpinning the EPA's renewable energy project regulatory regime — i.e. that
wind turbines which are set back 550m from a dwelling house and which do not generate
noise levels in excess of 40 dBA
at the
lowest specified
wind speed do not cause serious harm to human health based upon the current state of scientific knowledge.»