In that subgroup higher returns show up in
the low yielders.
In buying stocks I try to maintain a balance between high yielders (such as most REITS) and
low yielders with above average dividend growth rates (stock like SBUX, DAL).
As my horizon is 20 - 30 years I do not mind adding
some low yielders like $ DAL or $ ACN in there, as long as the dividend growth rate is substantial.
My current YOC is 3.97 % — meaning that I am not only on track for this goal but also that my portfolio has some more room for
low yielders with above average dividend growth rates.
Another theme was demand for
the lower yielders, especially the yen.
The stock is
a low yielder but has lots of growth.
Not exact matches
For now I aim to find a balance between
low and high
yielders with an average of 3.5 %.
Dividend growers also show tendencies to be more «all - weather» and we find currently sport relatively attractive valuations versus the highest
yielders that were bid up after years of
low rates and investor thirst for income.
In the
low - interest - rate, income - starved world of the past several years, those high
yielders drew a lot of interest — and assets — so much so that they are now quite expensive.
In the
low - interest - rate, income - starved world of the past several years, those high
yielders drew a lot of interest — and assets — so much so that they are now quite expensive.
And no, this is not because the highest excess returns come from the NEXT to highest dividend -
yielders so you would expect the NEXT to highest to have the
lowest volatility.
MFC seems like a good dividend
yielder if you purchased at some
low price.
The stock is a 3 %
yielder with extremely
low beta.