Sentences with phrase «lower average dividend yield»

The U.S. banks pay a lower average dividend yield of 2.2 %, whereas the Canadian banks pay an average yield of 3.7 %.

Not exact matches

An above - average dividend yield (the MSCI Canada Energy Index is yielding an annualized dividend of 3.6 % versus 2.9 % on the overall MSCI Canada index, according to Bloomberg data as of July 31, 2017) and lower price volatility could make energy a more attractive sector for income - seeking investors in a low yield world.

So no surprise that my weighted average dividend yield is lower in 2017 than 2016.

Low returns have followed characteristics that are more similar to today — a CAPE ratio in the mid-20's, where dividend yields, bond yields, and inflation were below average.

Medium Risk — Growth (M / GRW) Lower to average risk equities of companies with sound financials, consistent earnings growth, the potential for long - term price appreciation, a potential dividend yield, and / or share repurchase program.

Taking this key metric into account, I ran a screen for dividend payers in the energy and materials sector, trading on a major U.S. exchange with yields better than the 10 - year Treasury and an even more sustainable payout ratio of less than 25 % — lower than the S&P 500 average.

According to Brian, not only is the stock's forward P / E ratio of 15.0 much lower than its historical norm of 19.1, but its current dividend yield of 2 % is nearly double the company's 22 - year average yield of 1.2 %.

This lower stock price can also result in an above - average dividend yield.

The higher - yielding stocks paid an average total dividend over the 4 1/2 - year period of $ 5.72, while the lower - yielding stocks provided average total dividends of $ 3.43.

They are often characterized by low price - to - earnings or price - to - book ratios and sometimes by higher than average dividend yields.

While the average most - recent increase for all CCC companies was 9.8 %, many of those are stocks with much lower yields and much shorter streaks of dividend increases.

Most of our investments have characteristics that have been associated empirically with above - average investment rates of return over long measurement periods: a low stock price in relation to book value, a low price - to - earnings ratio, a low price - to - cash - flow ratio, an above - average dividend yield, a low price - to - sales ratio compared to other companies in the same industry, a significant pattern of purchases by insiders, a significant decline in share price.

My dividend investing portfolio's average yield is approximately 10 %, so EAD's 10.19 % dividend yield does nothing to raise or lower that average yield, and I'm fine with that.

With a little research you can find the current average dividend yield for stocks and from there, you can find stocks whose current yield is significantly higher (or lower).

The remaining stocks are then assigned a rank based on their yield (the higher the yield the higher the rank), payout ratio (the lower the payout ratio the higher the rank), 3 year dividend growth rate, and 5/10 year Dividend Acceleration / Deceleration (5 - year average increase divided by 10 - year average individend growth rate, and 5/10 year Dividend Acceleration / Deceleration (5 - year average increase divided by 10 - year average inDividend Acceleration / Deceleration (5 - year average increase divided by 10 - year average increase).

NNN's stock trades at 19.4 times estimated 2016 FFO per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8 %, which is significantly lower than its five - year average dividend yield of 4.9 %.

This is substantially lower than the average dividend yield for companies in the S&P 500 index (around 2.3 %).

These companies have increased their dividend for at least 15 years and have a lower than average price to earnings (PE) ratio, a higher operating margin, a low price to book, a reasonable dividend yield and payout ratio.

A little over a year ago, in June of 2015, I started a series of articles in which I highlight the stocks from the Dividend Champions list that have the highest and the lowest Percent Above Average Yield (PAAY) over the past year and over the past five years.

In Table 4, we see that, across regions, the baseline and constrained heuristic portfolios have substantially higher weighted - average market cap, lower price multiples, and higher dividend yields.

Value Investors thus select stocks with lower - than - average price - to - book or price - to - earnings ratios and / or high dividend yields.

A higher current yield compared to the stock's historical average suggests better valuation, because dividend yield is higher when price is lower, all else equal.

The following table shows the low end of the 5 and 10 year historical averages for dividend yield, P / E ratio, P / S ratio, and EBITDA per share as well as the FY 2015 estimate for each metric with the corresponding price targets.

Low returns have followed characteristics that are more similar to today — a CAPE ratio in the mid-20's, where dividend yields, bond yields, and inflation were below average.

This means dividends are low priority right now — the actual average sector yield's more like 0.7 %, if I count the majority of companies with a zero dividend.

Weiss» rule of thumb notes that stocks tend to be undervalued or overvalued when they are within the 10 % range of their historical levels of high or low dividend yield average.

Although each of these companies pays a dividend, due to the cyclical nature of this industry we encourage the reader to carefully review the dividend history Read more about 7 Large - cap Industrials with High Growth Rates, Low Valuations and Above - average Dividend Yields -dividend, due to the cyclical nature of this industry we encourage the reader to carefully review the dividend history Read more about 7 Large - cap Industrials with High Growth Rates, Low Valuations and Above - average Dividend Yields -dividend history Read more about 7 Large - cap Industrials with High Growth Rates, Low Valuations and Above - average Dividend Yields -Dividend Yields -LSB-...]

Read more about 7 Large - cap Industrials with High Growth Rates, Low Valuations and Above - average Dividend Yields

So typically, value investors select stocks with lower - than - average price - to - book or price - to - earnings ratios and / or high dividend yields.

It would put the dividend yield at just 2.8 %, far below the historical average of 4 % which has been attained at every bear market low.

Equity returns are the average of the starting dividend yield and the starting earnings yield (Garland, 2004), higher than dividend yield to account for reinvestment of retained earnings but lower than earnings yield to account for dilution (Bernstein and Arnott, 2003).

Establish a baseline to determine if a stock has a high, low or average dividend yield.

Its current price / sale, price / book, price / cashflow tend to be higher than its 5 years averages and the dividend yield stands lower than its 2,8 % five years average which would support that this stock is overvalued.

At times when the yield spread was less than 80 basis points — when REIT dividend yields were extraordinarily high, reflecting REIT stock prices that were especially low relative to current distributions — REIT performance over the next year tended to be especially strong, with total returns that averaged 20.81 percent and outpaced the broad stock market by 5.67 percentage points.

At times when the yield spread was greater than 180 basis points — that is, when REIT dividend yields were extraordinarily low, reflecting REIT stock prices that were especially high relative to their current distributions — REIT performance over the next year tended to be weak, with total returns that averaged 6.98 percent and underperformed the broad stock market by 1.84 percentage points.

To take the extreme case, it's very rare for the Baa - rated corporate bond yield to be less than the average REIT dividend yield: that has happened only at times when investors were most dramatically avoiding REITs, most recently in March 2009 at the lowest point of the Great Financial Crisis — and in the 12 months following that episode, those investors who bucked the market and bought into REITs were rewarded with total returns that exceeded 100 percent.