Sentences with phrase «lower claim frequencies»

Under collision and property damage liability coverages, the seven electric vehicles with exact conventional counterparts had lower claim frequencies and higher claim severities than their comparison vehicles.

Not exact matches

Currently, the claims that the low frequency EMF exposure is safe are based on the fact that there is no direct evidence showing that certain sources of EMF exposure are safe (or unsafe).

For Acura and Mercedes vehicles with auto brake, claim frequency for injuries to the insured vehicle's occupants tended to be lower as well, while results were the opposite for Volvo.

HLDI found that when those models were equipped with the feature, property damage liability claim frequency was 15 percent lower and bodily injury liability frequency was 35 percent lower.

The frequency of both collision and property damage liability claims is lower for vehicles that have it than for those that don't.

Property damage liability claim frequencies for Acura and Mercedes - Benz models were 14 percent lower when equipped with forward collision warning with autobrake than when they weren't.

In crashes of all severities, the frequency at which insurance collision claims were filed was 21 percent lower for the ABS models.

The first - generation system reduced claim frequency 33 percent, while the second - generation system lowered it 41 percent.

The frequency of claims under bodily injury liability insurance, which covers injuries to occupants of other vehicles or to other road users, is 24 percent lower with the feature.

HLDI found that claim frequency under collision insurance, which covers damage to the insured vehicle, was 5 percent lower for vehicles with the park assist feature than for those without, while claims under property damage liability, which covers damage to other vehicles, were 17 percent lower.

Motorcycle insurance companies do consider the broad severity, frequency and total losses related to certain claims, and states with helmet laws — and more wearers — have relatively lower rates.

There was another one in Nature recently, by Nyberg et al, that claims that hurricane frequencies were abnormally low in the 1970s and 1980s relative to the past 270 years.

They claim the symptoms result from low - frequency sound produced by the windmills.

DC, you say I am confused, claiming «the record clearly shows that Folland's criticism centred on apparent loss of low - frequency variation.»

So since Yamal.SPL has had its low - frequency component deliberately removed, it is not a suitable candidate for a climate proxy, and Briffa is not claiming it is.

The ONLY justification for wind power — the massive subsidies upon which it entirely depends (see our post here); spiralling power prices (see our post here); and the suffering caused to neighbours by incessant low - frequency noise and infrasound (see our post here)-- is the claim that it reduces CO2 emissions in the electricity sector.

The best you can do with any series probably is to limit what you do claim as a «trend» is that it is bounded by a single sine wave over the series as a lower frequency limit if you are going to be «accurate»..

In any case, it seems that people in the following professions have a lower frequency of traffic accident claims:

Motorcycle insurance companies do consider the broad severity, frequency and total losses related to certain claims, and states with helmet laws — and more wearers — have relatively lower rates.

The system's total frequency range is claimed at 70Hz - 20kHz, and the speakers got close to that low - end mark with some authority.

The system has a claimed frequency response of 60Hz - 20kHz, which seems congruent with our testing, though it predictably doesn't offer much power at the lowest point.

The frequency response is a claimed 80Hz - 20kHz, though the speaker cuts off in the low end sharply at what sounds like a bit before that 80Hz mark.

Frequency response for the S20 is a claimed 39Hz - 40kHz, and we'll tell you right now that we're pretty impressed by just how low they go.

Klipsch claims the frequency range goes all the way down to 5Hz, however, which is about as low as consumer earphones go — but that doesn't necessarily translate to deep bass response (see the next section for a close look at audio performance).

Add to that an almost ridiculous claimed frequency response stretching from 10Hz (nearly as low as you can go) to 50kHz (2.5 times higher than the limits of human hearing).

The claimed frequency response extends down to 40Hz on the low end (extending to 18kHz up top), and the default setting is fairly bass - heavy.

A newly designed 16 - in bass driver, claiming a massive 3.7 - in excursion, is partnered with a 1500W Sledge DSP amplifier, and the result is a thrilling combination of slam, speed, and precisions, with a low - frequency extension that unearths the deepest soundtrack details.»