Sentences with phrase «lower crash risk»

Standard allocations to bonds have traditionally helped to lower crash risk, but incorporating the systematic global macro strategy would have gone even further; for example, when the S&P 500 was down 16.8 % in October 2008, a 60/40 portfolio would have reduced total portfolio loss to 11.0 %, but a portfolio holding 30 % in systematic global macro would have experienced only a 5.8 % loss in that month.

Antilock brakes on trucks reduced the risk of a crash by 65 percent, while having electronic or roll stability control was associated with a 19 percent lower crash risk.

Not exact matches

Pretty much from his first statements as governor in 2013 — that's about $ 100,000 ago in real estate appreciation terms — through to last week when the bank released its latest financial system review, Poloz has walked a tightrope between admitting that elevated house prices and debt levels pose a risk to the economy, and assuring Canadians that the likelihood of a crash is actually pretty low.

It's low risk because even if the market crashes, the house hacker (relative to his peers, the renter, and the homeowner) stands a great chance of keeping his head above water just fine.

On the crash risk side, we're watching for any abrupt expansion in the number of stocks hitting new lows, particularly if it occurs on a string of consecutive down days.

None of the factors consistently generated positive performance during recent market crashes However, almost any factor exposure would have increased the risk - return ratio of an equity - centric portfolio Low Volatility and Mean - Reversion would have been most beneficial, Momentum least INTRODUCTION A

After the market crash of 2008 - 2009, it's easy to see how advisors and plan sponsors could be drawn to «Defensive Equity» or «Low Risk» strategies as ways to protect against future drawdowns.

But then what if, and just to point out there is ample risk in this «if», the combination crashes repeatedly after few highs in favour of «vast - and - hard» to recover lows.

It's important to note, though, that the risk of asphyxiation in a car seat is much lower than the risk of being injured or killed in a vehicle crash if a baby is not properly restrained in a car seat.

Despite claims that helmets do not protect the cervical spine during a motorcycle crash and may even increase the risk of injury, researchers from the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics in Madison found that, during an accident, helmet use lowers the likelihood of cervical spine injury (CSI), particularly fractures of the cervical vertebrae.

In my first few months with Baby V, we were almost exclusively pedestrians, a habit that drastically lowered my risk of a car crash.

It found substantial evidence of an association between cannabis use and the risk of motor vehicle crashes, as well as of lower birth weight after maternal use, more frequent chronic bronchitis episodes, and the development of schizophrenia or other psychoses.

If the operator is unaware that the vehicle has low brake fluid, there would be an increased risk of a crash.

Measures taken from the head, neck, and chest indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

Driver — In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

The safety belt and front and side curtain airbags worked together to keep the dummy in place, and measures taken from the dummy showed there would be a low risk of injury in a similar real - world crash.

In the Institute's test, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity, including head injury risk from the head contacting steering wheel rim.

Passenger — Measures from the dummies in the two tests, taken together, indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Driver — In the test of the 2009 model, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Measures taken from the dummy indicated a low risk of injuries in a crash of this severity.

Measures taken from the head, chest, and left leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

In the side impact test for both models, measures taken from both the driver dummy and the passenger dummy seated in the rear seat indicated low risk of significant injuries in a real - world crash like this one.

Measures recorded on the dummy indicated there would be a moderate risk of injuries to the right thigh, lower left leg and left foot in a real - world crash of this severity.

Concern: A loss of power steering assistance could result in the increased demand for driver effort to manipulate the vehicle safely especially at low speeds, placing vehicle occupants and bystanders at a greater degree of risk from a motor vehicle crash.

Measures taken from the head, chest, and legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

ESC lowers the risk of a fatal single - vehicle crash by about half, and it lowers the risk of a fatal rollover crash by as much as 70 percent (see «Roof strength affects injury risk in SUV rollover crashes, study finds,» March 15, 2008).

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in the second test in a crash of this severity.

A 2008 Institute analysis of insurance claims found that, all other factors being the same, drivers of vehicles with seat / head restraint combinations rated good in Institute evaluations were 15 percent less likely to sustain neck injuries in rear - end crashes than drivers of vehicles with poor head restraints (see «Neck injury risk is lower if seats and head restraints are rated good,» March 15, 2008).

And if the driver will continue using the vehicle with a tire that has low air pressure, the tire may fail, increasing the risk of a crash.

It engages automatically when it senses vehicle instability, and Institute research has found that ESC lowers the risk of fatal single - vehicle crashes by about half.

Although the overall side crash protection still would have been rated good, with low risk of injuries to both driver and rear passenger dummies, Nissan engineers were concerned about the interference with the deployment of the side curtain airbag.

In the second test, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Conequence: With a loss of power steering assist, extra steering effort will be required, especially at lower speeds, increasing the risk of a crash.

In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Measures taken from the dummy in the second test indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Concern: Over time, the ball joint corrosion may result in the front lower control arm separating from the ball joint, causing a loss of steering control and increasing the risk of a motor vehicle crash.

- Good structural performance in the small overlap front test - Low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of high severity - Side torso and side curtain airbags both deployed.

In a similar real - world crash there would be a low risk of any significant injuries to the driver or rear passenger.

Measures taken from the head, neck, chest, and left leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

In each test, measures taken from the head, neck, chest, and one leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

Passenger — Measures taken from the dummies in the two tests indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Conequence: MOVEMENT OF THE LOWER CONTROL ARM WILL INFLUENCE THE DRIVER»S CONTROL OF THE STEERING OF THE VEHICLE INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Measures taken from the dummy indicated a low risk of injuries in a real crash of the same severity.

Measures taken from the head, neck, and right leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

Concern: If power steering assist is lost, greater driver effort would be required to steer the vehicle at low speeds, increasing the risk of a motor vehicle crash.

In each test, measures taken from the head, neck, and chest indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

Research shows that drivers of vehicles that earn good ratings in frontal offset crash tests have significantly lower risk of fatal injuries in real - world frontal crashes, compared with drivers of vehicles with poor ratings.