The ETP produced a significantly
lower cumulative return than that of its reference ETF portfolio.
The fund significantly underperformed its reference ETF portfolio in terms of both
a lower cumulative return and higher volatility.
Not exact matches
Both oilsands royalties and corporate income taxes are paid on a net revenue basis (yes, oilsands royalties are initially paid on gross revenue, but at a
lower rate which applies until
cumulative net revenue has provided a small
return on initial capital, so it's basically the same thing).
Its
cumulative return was
lower and the volatility (measured as a standard deviation of monthly
returns) higher than those of its reference ETF portfolio.
Its reference ETF portfolio produced a 73.6 %
cumulative return, more than double the 31.3 % of the fund, and did so with a slightly
lower volatility.
It also
returned about 8 % more than the fund on a
cumulative basis and with a 59 %
lower volatility.
Similarly, from the 2009
low, we should expect a
return of 9.1 % p.a. by 2019 (
cumulative return of 139 %), but given we are at 138 % total
return today, over the next 6 years, we might expect no additional
return.
With just 0.21 % of
cumulative excess
return, the fund failed to substantially beat its reference ETF portfolio that had a slightly
lower volatility.
The fund's
cumulative return was over 23.3 %
lower than that of its reference ETF portfolio of a slightly higher volatility.
The graph and table below show the
cumulative total
return of eleven different value - weighted sub-portfolios - stocks that do not pay a dividend, and then ten deciles ranking dividend yield from
lowest to highest.
As a result, RESCUE's
cumulative return rate is 3 %, one of the
lowest in the nation (nationally, over 50 % of all adopted animals are no longer in their adoptive home after just the first year).
Under the proposal, any
cumulative surplus recorded in the EI Operating Account will be
returned to employers and employees through
lower EI premium rates once the new mechanism takes effect.