lower episiotomy rate and reduced analgesic requirements when compared with other delivery positions.
One Italian study published in 2005 by the National Institutes of Health showed
a lower episiotomy rate, shorter first stage of labor and no increased rate of infection.
Not exact matches
The odds of receiving individual interventions (augmentation, epidural or spinal analgesia, general anaesthesia, ventouse or forceps delivery, intrapartum caesarean section,
episiotomy, active management of the third stage) were
lower in all three non-obstetric unit settings, with the greatest reductions seen for planned home and freestanding midwifery unit births (table 4 ⇓).
The planned home birth outcomes included much
lower rates of epidural,
episiotomy, and assisted delivery, and cesarean section.
Published by Birth (sponsored by Lamaze International), the Hutton study shows
lower rates of interventions such as cesarean section,
episiotomy, and medical pain relief for the home birth group.
That BC study was underpowered to detect differences in perinatal mortality, but hey, its more important to have a
lower risk of
episiotomy or instrumental delivery than a live baby, right?
Paradigm shifting research done in the 1980's and 1990's demonstrated that a median
episiotomy (straight up and down), by weakening the tissue of the
lower vagina, made tears down to the rectum MORE likely, not less.
Lower your risk: Recent studies have shown that the routine use of
episiotomy does not benefit the mother or newborn.
There is also research showing that moms who planned to give birth at home (regardless of where they actually had their babies) ended up with fewer interventions, such as
episiotomies and c - sections, compared with a group of equally
low - risk women who had planned hospital deliveries.
Good pelvic muscle tone resulting in
lower chance of an
episiotomy or tearing.
Medical intervention rates included epidural (4.7 %),
episiotomy (2.1 %), forceps (1.0 %), vacuum extraction (0.6 %), and caesarean section (3.7 %); these rates were substantially
lower than for
low risk US women having hospital births.
For
low - risk pregnancies and births, women enjoyed better outcomes: reduced Caesarean sections, instrumental deliveries and
episiotomies.
Women who gave birth at hospitals with more midwife - attended births had
lower odds of delivering by cesarean and
lower odds of
episiotomy.