Sentences with phrase «lower income per capita»

The emerging markets are in less developed countries with emerging economies that may be characterized by lower income per capita, less developed infrastructure and nascent capital markets.

Sen gives examples of countries with relatively high income per capita but low quality of life (South Africa, Singapore) and others with relatively low income per capita but high quality of life (Sri Lanka, Costa Rica).

The National Institute for Labor Relations Research reported that in 2011, when disposable personal income — personal income minus taxes — was adjusted for differences in living costs, the seven states with the lowest incomes per capita (Alaska, California, Hawaii, Maine, Oregon, Vermont, and West Virginia) lack Right to Work laws.

Not exact matches

«To have a high per - capita income and low income inequality is worth noting, because it means that a broad section of the population has the ability to put money towards their retirement,» he explains.

Countries with lower per capita incomes — and higher unemployment — have higher rates of women - led entrepreneurship.

A combination of a lower per capita income and higher booze prices (a case of 24 bottles of Molson Canadian is 24 % more expensive in Newfoundland than Ontario) combine to help create the higher percentages even if volumes were exactly the same.

High poverty levels aren't a sufficient reason either, seeing as other countries with low levels of per - capita income, such as Kenya and Jamaica, consistently fare better, he added.

«The departure of a franchise in any sports... has never significantly lowered real per capita personal income in a metropolitan area.»

While growth in China is trending lower, the share of global output produced in China will continue to rise, as per capita incomes converge towards those in the more advanced economies (Graph 6).

Both of these countries, especially India, have very large populations, and per capita incomes are still quite low.

So, in Canada's case, lower labour productivity and fewer hours worked caused Canada's income per capita to be lower than that of the United States.

Indeed, among Canada's 16 peer countries, the U.S. has the second - highest level of income per capita but also the highest rates of poverty and homicides and the lowest life expectancy.

For example, to calculate what portion of the Canada-U.S. gap in income per capita is due to Canada's lower labour productivity, we substitute U.S. labour productivity into the equation but keep Canadian data for the other four components (hours worked, unemployment, labour force participation, and demographic structure).

If Canada's ratio of employment to its labour force had decreased to the U.S. level (and the other four factors had stayed the same), Canada's income per capita would have been $ 500 lower.

Idaho has some of the lowest per capita personal income (PCPI) in the nation, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The estimated tax burden for state residents, at just 7.1 % of per capita income, is second lowest of all states.

Although, it's worth mentioning that per capita taxes are used, albeit in much smaller sums, and that's one reason why lower income earners can end up paying a larger percentage of their income toward taxes.

Haiti has the lowest per capita income of any country in the western hemisphere.

The success of the East Asian economies» first Japan and more recently the other East Asian market economies» shows that there is a crucial governmental role in providing services such as widespread education and health care, which it is quite possible for governments to do successfully at a fairly low level of per capita income.

After adjusting for inflation, the per capita expenditures of the lowest - income one fifth of the U.S. population today exceed the per capita income of the median American household in 1955.

«We offer high - quality products designed so that Bolivian consumers, who have one of the lowest per capita incomes in Latin America, may have the pleasure of consuming products comparable to those of any developed country,,» he says.

The categorisation of a country as developing or developed is subject to objective criteria, such as infant mortality rate, adult literacy rate, Gross National Income per capita, percentage of infants with low birth weight, percentage of population using improved water sources and percentage of population urbanised.

The report draws on government and trade statistics, academic evidence and economic theory to challenge arguments that the health and social benefits of reducing alcohol consumption are likely to come at a cost to the economy, finding: · Any reduction in employment and income resulting from lower spending on alcohol would be offset by spending on other goods · Econometric analysis of US states suggests that a 10 % decrease in alcohol consumption is associated with a 0.4 % increase in per capita income growth · Lower alcohol consumption could also reduce the economic costs of impaired workplace productivity, alcohol - related sickness, unemployment and premature death, which are estimated to cost the UK # 8 - 11 billion a year The analysis comes at a timely moment, with health groups urging the Chancellor to raise alcohol duty in next month's Bulower spending on alcohol would be offset by spending on other goods · Econometric analysis of US states suggests that a 10 % decrease in alcohol consumption is associated with a 0.4 % increase in per capita income growth · Lower alcohol consumption could also reduce the economic costs of impaired workplace productivity, alcohol - related sickness, unemployment and premature death, which are estimated to cost the UK # 8 - 11 billion a year The analysis comes at a timely moment, with health groups urging the Chancellor to raise alcohol duty in next month's BuLower alcohol consumption could also reduce the economic costs of impaired workplace productivity, alcohol - related sickness, unemployment and premature death, which are estimated to cost the UK # 8 - 11 billion a year The analysis comes at a timely moment, with health groups urging the Chancellor to raise alcohol duty in next month's Budget.

«Today, Ghana's per capita is thousand two hundred [or] thousand three hundred so we are a lower middle income country.

- GDP per capita is still lower than it was before the recession - Earnings and household incomes are far lower in real terms than they were in 2010 - Five million people earn less than the Living Wage - George Osborne has failed to balance the Budget by 2015, meaning 40 % of the work must be done in the next parliament - Absolute poverty increased by 300,000 between 2010/11 and 2012/13 - Almost two - thirds of poor children fail to achieve the basics of five GCSEs including English and maths - Children eligible for free school meals remain far less likely to be school - ready than their peers - Childcare affordability and availability means many parents struggle to return to work - Poor children are less likely to be taught by the best teachers - The education system is currently going through widespread reform and the full effects will not be seen for some time - Long - term youth unemployment of over 12 months is nearly double pre-recession levels at around 200,000 - Pay of young people took a severe hit over the recession and is yet to recover - The number of students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds going to Russell Group universities has flatlined for a decade

The association also says the bill's new formula for the federal government's share of Medicaid — known as the «per capita cap» — would end Medicaid as an open - ended entitlement and impose limits on payments to hospitals for low - income patients.

A new study has found that between 2000 and 2015 global consumption of antibiotics jumped 65 percent.The data from 76 countries found that while antibiotic use soared in lower income countries, consumption in high - income countries was static but still considerably higher per capita than LIMCs.

The coalition government led by Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao has launched a 20 - year Strategic Development Plan that began in 2011 aiming at transforming Timor - Leste in the course of the next two decades, from low middle income country to upper middle income with an annual per capita income of at least $ 10,000.

Actually, 244 of the 250 counties in the nation with the lowest per capita income are non-metropolitan.

In 2005, West Virginia, saddled with the nation's highest rate of adult illiteracy and lowest per capita income, recognized that its schools urgently needed an overhaul if its students weren't going to fall off the charts in the fast - moving age of digital technology.

Once again, no country is located in the bad quadrant, the one with higher per - capita incomes and lower enrollment rates.

In other words, their investment in education relative to their per - capita income would have been lower than in the United States at the turn of the century.

Nations found in the good quadrant had lower real per - capita incomes in 1990 than did the United States in 1900 but a higher enrollment rate in 1990 than the United States had in 1900.

The lowest of the four points in the figure represents the real per - capita income and the high - school enrollment rate in the United States in 1900, just before the expansion of secondary - school education as a result of the U.S. «high - school movement.»

By contrast, nations in the southeast quadrant, the bad quadrant, would have had higher per - capita incomes in 1990 than the United States did in 1900 but lower current enrollment rates than the United States had in 1900.

But in educational attainment, students in Texas are, on average, one to two years ahead of California students of the same age, even though Texas has a lower per capita income and spends less per pupil than California does (Exhibit 3).

The first is that because of the higher per capita taxes for single households, plus the lower net incomes, most single households will have smaller investment portfolios than an equivalent couple.

A jump in daily essentials has a more profound negative impact on living standards in economies with lower levels of real per capita income.

The town has the lowest per capita income on the list, but the bosses seem nice.

The highest U.S. areas that receive benefits (in per - capita dollars) are in low - income areas.

For example, there is growing evidence that factors like low per capita incomes, economic contraction, and inconsistent state institutions are associated with the incidence of civil wars, and also seem to be sensitive to climate change.

In 1991, 44 percent of children in the world's low - income countries (with gross national incomes under $ 1,000 per capita) completed primary school.

The EU's burden - sharing proposal is complex and detailed, in large part because it is designed to explicitly introduce equity into the burden - sharing system through special provisions for Member States with lower per capita incomes.

It is still the case that 10 % of the rights to auction allowances will be redistributed from Member States with high per capita income to those with low per capita income in order to strengthen the financial capacity of the latter to invest in climate friendly technologies.

But on a per - capita basis, they are still developing countries, some of them low - income.

States with the lowest per capita transportation and residential emissions (New York, District of Columbia, Oregon, California, Rhode Island, Washington, Vermont, and New Hampshire) are by no means the poorest in the nation; indeed, these states are all above the national average in per capita income.

Not necessarily because the real GDP per capita of Los Angeles is twice that of Berlin ($ US 21,432)- rather because the urbanization patterns in cities from high - income nations as Stockholm, Tokyo, and Berlin (with lower levels of GHG emissions) suggest that there is not necessarily an inevitable relationship between rising incomes, increasing use of private cars and increasing GHG emissions.

Where is the evidence that they will agree to anything sufficient in 2020, when their per capita incomes will still be markedly lower than other developed countries?

Economic modeling shows that about 60 % of the public, especially low - income people, would receive more money via a per capita 100 % dispersal of the collected fee than they would pay because of increased prices [241].

The Princeton group's multi-stage formula estimates individual emissions based on lifestyle and income rather than per capita national income — a departure from the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which set no specific goals or timetables for emission reductions by developing nations until the developed world had found a model for low - carbon economic growth.