In my view, careful co-ordination of all policy instruments is more likely to deliver sustained lower inflation at acceptable cost in Australia than is, for example, relying on monetary policy to sustain
a low inflation target.
Not exact matches
The Bank of England (BOE) said Thursday that U.K.
inflation should now overshoot its 2 percent
target as early as late 2017 and would also be
lower than previously expected.
The situation isn't easy for President Draghi who has to deal with a stronger growth, but
inflation that is
lower than the ECB's
target and a stronger currency.
WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged Wednesday but noted that
inflation is nearing its 2 percent
target rate after years of remaining undesirably
low.
The BoE held its key policy rate at a record -
low in June, despite
inflation levels that sit well above the central's bank
target.
Analysts who follow the Fed complain that its framework has become confusing:
low unemployment and
inflation close to the 2 %
target would not seem consistent with a policy rate more aligned to a recession.
That insight, as obvious as it may seem, conflicts with the Fed's policy of raising interest rates preemptively, even as
inflation continues to undershoot its
target, essentially on concerns that a 17 - year -
low 4.1 % jobless rate may already be beyond what officials consider «full employment.»
Another assumption that public pension funds are making in setting
lower investment
target rates is that
inflation will remain
low for some time.
British
inflation fell to its
lowest level in more than 12 years in November, coming in at half the Bank of England's two percent
target and leaving it under no pressure to raise interest rates anytime soon.
The longtime investor added that since 1970, the very long - term average of
inflation is 1.9 percent, but that the average is biased upward by war - time
inflation spikes, implying that a better
target maybe be significantly
lower.
Inflation isn't an issue: the annual rate was 1.3 % in July, the
lower end of the central bank's
target of 1 % to 3 %.
Others are convinced that the Federal Reserve is unlikely to hit its 2 percent
inflation target this year as
low U.S.
inflation is set to continue.
Although a number of temporary factors are keeping headline
inflation near its 2 per cent
target, our measures of core
inflation are in the
lower half of the
target band and have been trending downward in recent quarters.
For the past quarter century, the Bank of Canada has had the responsibility of using monetary policy to achieve
low, stable and predictable
inflation, a goal cemented in our 2 per cent
inflation target.
Thoroughly reviewing the key aspects of
inflation targeting is certainly necessary, and could go a long way towards mitigating the obstructions posed by
low r - star.
As a result, we have raised our 2018 S&P 500 earnings - per - share estimate from $ 140 to $ 150 (versus $ 130 in 2017), with a
target P / E multiple of 20 due to relatively
low Treasury yields (around 2.40 %) and benign core PCE
inflation (1.4 %).
Total CPI
inflation remains near the bottom of the Bank's
target range as the disinflationary effects of economic slack and
low consumer energy prices are only partially offset by the inflationary impact of the
lower Canadian dollar on the prices of imported goods.
First, the most direct attack on
low r - star would be for central banks to pursue a somewhat higher
inflation target.
The figure includes the unemployment rate, the Fed's estimate of the «natural rate» — the
lowest unemployment rate they believe to be consistent with stable
inflation at the 2 %
target — year - over-year wage and price growth (using the core - PCE deflator, the Fed's preferred
inflation benchmark right now).
Importantly, this is happening without any signs of overheating:
inflation remains
low, consistently below the Fed's
target rate.
The
inflation target was achieved, the average rate of unemployment was
low and the variability of both real GDP and unemployment were if anything slightly
lower than in the past.
To conclude, over the past decade and in a very volatile world, Australia has achieved the
inflation target, avoided a major economic downturn, seen remarkably little variability in real economic activity in the face of enormous shocks, experienced a fairly
low average rate of unemployment, and had a stable financial system as well.
The figure below shows some of the key indicators from the Fed's dashboard, including unemployment, the Fed's guess at the «natural rate» (the
lowest unemployment rate consistent with stable
inflation), actual
inflation (PCE core, the Fed's preferred gauge), and the Fed's
inflation target of 2 percent.
It's 16 times more likely that you'll be at the zero
lower bound with a zero per cent
inflation target, versus a two per cent
target.
With the benefit of hindsight, given the
lower - than - expected
inflation outcomes, this would have resulted in a significant undershooting of the
inflation target.
After observing this in one period the central bank will decide to
lower interest rates, inferring from below -
target inflation / prices that there has been a negative demand shock.
Q: Sticking closer to home, Canadians have come to trust the Bank of Canada to keep
inflation low, but you've referred, in recent weeks, to the need for «flexibility» in
inflation targeting.
In part this reflects the starting point of many central banks that adopted
inflation targeting: they generally had a poor
inflation history and
low credibility with the public and financial markets.
But rates still remain
low, historically speaking — the Fed's now
targeting an FFR (Fed funds rate) of just 1.25 - 1.5 % — and
inflation remains below the Fed's
target.
That's even before we get into the fact 2 %
inflation target is too
low and doesn't match any sustained historical record of prosperity in the last 60 years.
Those number I just cited are still persistent misses from the Fed's 2 percent
target, and just as importantly, such a gradual,
low - variance trend confirms that
inflation expectations remain well - anchored, as you can see here.
The first reason, developed in that blog, was that the Fed should have signaled a desire to exceed its two percent
inflation target during periods of protracted recovery and
low unemployment and in this context to signal that a rate increase was off the table for September and quite likely the rest of the year.
That framework's been in place since the early 1990s, we have hit the
target over that 20 year period, the average
inflation rate's pretty close to 2.5 per cent, so we regard that as successful by the terms of the definition that we set ourselves and I think that's made a big contribution to economic stability more generally and I don't think it's an accident that that period of fairly
low predictable
inflation has coincided with pretty good sustained growth in the economy.
However, our core
inflation measures are all in the
lower half of the
target band and have been trending downward.
Last point: as I stress in the WaPo piece, the
inflation target is too
low — at 2 %, it invokes possible zero -
lower - bound problems the next time we hit a downturn, and especially with a... um... difficult Congress (meaning adequate countercyclical fiscal policy may well not be forthcoming), that's a really serious problem.
In that sense, the Fed has the potential to make a huge structural difference in the economic lives of blacks and other minorities by heavily weighting the full employment part of the their mandate relative to the
inflation part, especially since there's still considerable slack in the job market, with
lower - wage, minority workers facing the brunt of it, and — importantly — little evidence of inflationary pressure (if anything, the Fed has missed their
inflation target on the
low side for a few years running now).
There is the further point that the logic that led to the adoption of the 2 percent
inflation target years ago suggests that it is too
low now.
Countries such as the US without a formal
target have also indicated that there is an
inflation rate so
low as to be undesirable.
To sum up, once interest rates reach very
low levels, the central bank still has meaningful tools that it can deploy in its pursuit of its
inflation target: offering forward guidance to financial markets to enhance policy effectiveness, large - scale asset purchases, funding for credit, and pushing short - term interest rates below zero.
The policy implication is that had the Fed
targeted higher
inflation in recent years, a
lower real interest rate could have hastened the recovery.
While this move will likely cause some anxiety, we view the chances of a significant
inflation overshoot relative to
target as
low and think that the Federal Reserve can and will stay on a gradual rate hike path (our base case).
But then came NAFTA, the Bank of Canada's
inflation -
targeting, the federal budget cuts of the 1980s, the GST and much
lower corporate income tax rate.
All of the argument about appropriate
inflation targeting in recent years has focused not on whether 2 percent is too high but on whether it is too
low a
target.
To achieve our monetary policy goal of
low, stable and predictable
inflation at the 2 per cent
target rate, our economy should operate at, or close to, its productive capacity.
stocks on Wednesday close
lower, after initially edging slightly higher, as the Federal Reserve acknowledged rising prices and said it now expects
inflation to «run near» its 2 %
target «over the medium term,» in its most recent policy statement.
«With
inflation set to stay outside the RBA's
target band until at least mid-2017, we expect to see another cut in the cash rate in August to a
low of 1.5 per cent.»
At this time,
inflation is running
lower than the
target rate.
However resilient the US economy, the slowdown being experienced in Asia and Latin America may force the Fed to
lower its growth outlook (in June, the central bank announced a reduction in its so - called «central tendency for growth» through 2017) and could dent confidence that
inflation will accelerate toward the Fed's
target within a reasonable time frame.
Inflation has remained at historically
low levels over much of the past decade, well below the US Federal Reserve's
target of 2 %.
With
low money and credit growth persisting,
inflation below
target and growth slower than in previous years I now expect the BoE's Monetary Policy Committee to keep interest rates unchanged during this year.